Validation of the models

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 185-199

  Benfenati, Emilio ^a   Chrétien, Jacques R ^b   Gini, Giuseppina ^c   Piclin, Nadège ^b   Pintore, Marco ^b   Roncaglioni, Alessandra ^a  

^a MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

^b BioChemics Consulting   (France)

^c POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882776376     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044452710-3/50008-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. AMBIT (2006) http://ambit.acad.bg/.
2. Benfenati E. Modelling aquatic toxicity with advanced computational techniques: procedures to standardize data and compare models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 3303/2004 'Knowledge Exploration in Life Science Informatics' 2004, 235-248. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany. J.A. López, E. Benfenati, W. Dubitzky (Eds.).
3. Besalú E., Gironés X., Amat L., Carbó-Dorca R. Molecular quantum similarity and the fundamentals of QSAR. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35:289-295.
4. Bi J., Bennett K.P. Regression error characteristic curves. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2003) 2003, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.
5. CE 95/365/CE: commission decision of 25 July 1995 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to laundry detergents. Official J. L. 1995, 217:14-30.
6. Devillers J. QSAR modeling of large heterogeneous sets of molecules. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2001, 12:515-528.
7. Eriksson L., Jaworska J., Worth A., Cronin M., McDowell R.M., Gramatica P. Methods for reliability, uncertainty assessment, and applicability evaluations of regression based and classifi-cation QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111:1361-1375.
8. Eriksson L., Johansson E., Kettaneh-Wold N., Wold S. Introduction to Multi and Megavariate Data Analysis Using Projection Methods (PCA & PLS) 1999, Umetrics AB, Umea, Sweden.
9. Gasteiger J., Zupan J. Neural networks in chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32:503-527.
10. Golbraikh A., Shen M., Xiao Z., Xiao Y.D., Lee K.H., Tropsha A. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17:241-253.
11. Golbraikh A., Tropsha A. Beware of q2!. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20:269-276.
12. Helma C., Kramer S. A survey of the predictive toxicology challenge 2000-2001. Bioinfor-matics 2003, 19:1179-1182.
13. Jaworska J., Nikolova-Jeliazkova N., Aldenberg T. QSAR applicability domain estimation by projection of the training set in descriptor space: a review. Altern. Lab. Anim. 2005, 33:445-459.
14. Kennard R.W., Stone L.A. Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 1969, 11:137-148.
15. Kubat M., Holte R.C., Matwin S. Machine learning for the detection of oil spills in satellite radar images. Mach. Learn. 1998, 30:195-215.
16. Makara G.M. Measuring molecular similarity and diversity: total pharmacophore diversity. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44:3563-3571.
17. Marengo E., Todeschini R. A new algorithm for optimal distance-based experimental design. Chemom. Int. Lab. Syst. 1992, 16:37-44.
18. Netzeva T.I., Worth A.P., Aldenberg T., Benigni R., Cronin M.T.D., Gramatica P., Jaworska J.S., Kahn S., Klopman G., Marchant C.A., Myatt G., Nikolova-Jeliazkova N., Patlewicz G.Y., Perkins R., Roberts D.W., Schultz T.W., Stanton D.T., van de Sandt J.J.M., Tong W., Veith G., Yang C. Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure- activity relationships. Altern. Lab. Anim. 2005, 33:155-173.
19. Sheridan R.P., Feuston B.P., Maiorov V.N., Kearsley S.K. Similarity to molecules in the training set is a good discriminator for prediction accuracy in QSAR. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44:1912-1928.
20. Snarey M., Terrett N.K., Willett P., Wilton D.J. Comparison of algorithms for dissimilarity-based compound selection. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 1997, 15:372-385.
21. Toivonen H., Srinivasan A., King R.D., Kramer S., Helma C. Statistical evaluation of the predictive toxicology challenge 2000-2001. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1183-1193.
22. Tropsha A., Grammatica P., Gombar V.K. The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22:69-77.
23. Zupan J., Novic M., Ruisánchez I. Kohonen and counter propagation artificial neural networks in analytical chemistry. Chemom. Int. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38:1-23.