Ethanol from laccase-detoxified lignocellulose by the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces-Effects of steam pretreatment conditions, process configurations and substrate loadings

Biochemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 79, Issue , 2013, Pages 94-103

  Moreno, Antonio D ^a   Ibarra, David ^b,c   Ballesteros, Ignacio ^b   Fernández, José L ^b   Ballesteros, Mercedes ^b  

^a IMDEA ENERGY INSTITUTE   (Spain)

^b CIEMAT   (Spain)

^c Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

Author keywords

Kluyveromyces marxianus; Laccase detoxification; Lignocellulosic ethanol; Process configurations; Steam explosion; Substrate loadings

Indexed keywords

KLUYVEROMYCES MARXIANUS; LACCASES; LIGNOCELLULOSIC ETHANOLS; PROCESS CONFIGURATION; STEAM EXPLOSION; SUBSTRATE LOADING;

DETOXIFICATION; ENZYMES; ETHANOL; SLURRIES; STEAM; STRAW; SUBSTRATES; YEAST;

LOADING;

ALCOHOL; LACCASE; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

AGRICULTURAL SLURRY; ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOPROCESS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DETOXIFICATION; EXPLOSION; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; HEAT TOLERANCE; KLUYVEROMYCES MARXIANUS; NONHUMAN; PRESACCHARIFICATION AND SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHARIFICATION; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; SOLID; STRAW; WATER VAPOR; WHEAT; WHEAT STRAW SLURRY;

EID: 84882770413     PISSN: 1369703X     EISSN: 1873295X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2013.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Directive 2009/28/EC, Directive of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, Brussels, 2009. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do%3Furi=OJ%3AL%3A2009%3A140%3A0016%3A0062%3Aen%3APDF.
2. International Energy Agency From 1st to 2nd Generation Biofuel Technologies: an Overview of Current Industry and RD&D Activities 2008, OECD/IEA, Paris. http://www.iea.org/textbase/papers/2008/2nd_Biofuel_Gen.pdf.
3. Kim S., Dale B.E. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass and Bioenergy 2003, 26:361-375.
4. Alvira P., Tomás-Pejó E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:4851-4861.
5. Klinke H.B., Thomsen A.B., Ahring B.K. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pretreatment of biomass. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2004, 66:10-26.
6. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal.B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanism of inhibition. Bioresource Technology 2000, 74:25-33.
7. Panagiotou G., Olsson L. Effect of compounds released during pre-treatment of wheat straw on microbial growth and enzymatic hydrolysis rates. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2007, 96:250-258.
8. García-Aparicio M.P., Ballesteros I., González A., Oliva J.M., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Effect of inhibitors released during steam-explosion pretreatment of barley straw on enzymatic hydrolysis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2006, 129:278-288.
9. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal.B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresource Technology 2000, 74:17-24.
10. Parawira W., Tekere M. Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 2011, 31:20-31.
11. Chandel A.K., Kapoor R.K., Singh A., Kuhad R.C. Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate improves ethanol production by Candida shehatae NCIM 3501. Bioresource Technology 2007, 98:1947-1950.
12. Jönsson J.L., Palmqvist E., Nilvebrant N.-O., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1998, 49:691-697.
13. Jurado M., Prieto A., Martínez-Alcalá A., Martínez A.T., Martínez M.J. Laccase detoxification of steam-exploded wheat straw for second generation bioethanol. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:6378-6384.
14. Larsson S., Reimann A., Nilvebrant N.-O., Jönsson J.L. Comparison of different methods for the detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1999, 77-79:91-103.
15. Martín C., Galbe M., Wahlbom C.F., Hahn-Hägerdal B., Jönsson J.L. Ethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysates of sugarcane bagasse using recombinant xylose-utilising Saccharomyces cerevisae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2002, 31:274-282.
16. Moreno A.D., Ibarra D., Fernández J.L., Ballesteros M. Different laccase detoxification strategies for ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass by the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CECT 10875. Bioresource Technology 2012, 106:101-109.
17. Olofsson K., Bertilsson M., Liden G. A short review on SSF - an interesting option for ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstock. Biotechnology and Biofuels 2008, 1:1-14.
18. Alfani F., Gallifuoco F.F., Saporosi A., Spera A., Cantarella M. Comparison of SHF and SSF process for bioconversion of steam-exploded wheat straw. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2000, 25:184-192.
19. Öhgren K., Vehmaanperä J., Siika-Aho M., Galbe M., Viikari L., Zacchi G. High temperature enzymatic prehydrolysis prior to simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam pretreated corn stover for ethanol production. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2007, 40:607-613.
20. Manzanares P., Negro M.J., Oliva J.M., Saéz F., Ballesteros I., Ballesteros M., Cara C., Castro E., Ruiz E. Different process configurations for bioethanol production from pretreated olive pruning biomass. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 2011, 86:881-887.
21. Abbel-Bannat B.M.A., Hoshida H., Ano A., Hoshida H., Nonklang S., Akada R. High temperature fermentation: how can processes for ethanol production at high temperatures become superior to the traditional process using mesophilic yeast?. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010, 85:861-867.
22. Ballesteros I., Ballesteros M., Cabañas A., Carrasco J., Martín C., Negro M.J., Sáez F., Sáez R. Selection of thermotolerant yeasts for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of cellulose to ethanol. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 1991, 28:307-315.
23. Ballesteros M., Oliva J.M., Negro M.J., Manzanares P., Ballesteros I. Ethanol from lignocellulosic materials by a simultaneous process (SFS) with Kluyveromyces marxianus CECT 10878. Process Biochemistry 2004, 39:1843-1848.
24. García-Aparicio M.P., Oliva J.M., Manzanares P., Ballesteros M., Ballesteros I., González A., Negro M.J. Second-generation ethanol production from steam exploded barley straw by Kluyveromyces marxianus CECT 10875. Fuel 2011, 90:1624-1630.
25. Tomás-Pejó E., Oliva J.M., González A., Ballesteros I., Ballesteros M. Bioethanol production from wheat straw by the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CECT 10875 in a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation fed-batch process. Fuel 2009, 88:2142-2147.
26. NREL, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Chemical Analysis and Testing Laboratory Analytical Procedures, Golden, CO, 2007. http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html.
27. Ghose T.K. Measurement of cellulase activity. Pure and Applied Chemistry 1987, 59:257-268.
28. Ibarra D., Romero J., Martínez M.J., Martínez A.T., Camarero S. Exploring the enzymatic parameters for optimal delignification of eucalypt pulp by laccase-mediator. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2006, 39:1319-1327.
29. Hendriks A.T.W., Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:10-18.
30. Oliva J.M., Sáez F., Ballesteros I., González A., Negro M.J., Manzanares P., Ballesteros M. Effect of lignocellulosic degradation compounds from steam explosion pretreatment on ethanol fermentation by thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2003, 105:141-154.
31. Sun Y., Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresource Technology 2002, 83:1-11.
32. Alvira P., Moreno A.D., Ibarra D., Sáez F., Ballesteros M. Improving the fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by laccase during ethanol production from steam-exploded wheat straw at high-substrate loading. Biotechnology Progress 2013, 29:74-82.
33. Thomsen M.T., Thygesen A., Thomsen A.B. Identification and characterization of fermentation inhibitors formed during hydrothermal treatment and following SSF of wheat straw. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2009, 83:447-455.
34. Juhász T., Szengyel Z., Réczey K., Siika-Aho M., Viikari L. Characterization of cellulases and hemicellulases produced by Trichoderma reesei on various carbon sources. Process Biochemistry 2005, 40:3519-3525.
35. Dien B.S., Ximenes E.A., ÓBryan P.J., Moniruzzaman M., Li X.-L., Balan V., Dale B., Cotta M.A. Enzyme characterization for hydrolysis of AFEX and liquid hot-water pretreated distillers' grains and their conversion to ethanol. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99:5216-5225.
36. Banerjee S., Mudliar S., Sen R., Giri B., Staputi D., Chakrrabarti T., Pandey R.A. Commercializing lignocellulosic bioethanol: technology bottlenecks and possible remedies. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2009, 4:77-93.
37. Oliva J.M., Ballesteros I., Negro M.J., Manzanares P., Cabañas A., Ballesteros M. Effect of binary combinations of selected toxic compounds on growth and fermentation of Kluyveromyces marxianus. Biotechnology Progress 2004, 20:715-720.
38. Almeida J.R.M., Moding T., Petersson A., Hahn-Hägerdal B., Liden G., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 2007, 82:340-349.
39. Kwon Y.-J., Ma A.-Z., Li Q., Wang F., Zhuang G.-Q., Liu C.-Z. Effect of lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds on growth and ethanol fermentation of newly-isolated thermotolerant Issatchenkia orientalis. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:8099-8104.
40. Stenberg K., Bollók M., Réczey K., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Effect of substrate and cellulase concentration on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated softwood for ethanol production. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2000, 68:205-210.
41. Linde M., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated barley straw at low enzyme loadings and low yeast concentration. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2007, 40:1100-1107.
42. Tomás-Pejó E., Oliva J.M., Ballesteros M., Olsson L. Comparison of SHF and SSF processes from steam-exploded wheat straw for ethanol production by xylose-fermenting and robust glucose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2008, 100:1122-1131.
43. Ximenes E., Kim Y., Mosier N., Dien B., Ladisch M. Inhibition of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2010, 46:170-176.
44. Ximenes E., Kim Y., Mosier N., Dien B., Ladisch M. Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2011, 48:54-60.
45. Moilanen U., Kellock M., Galkin S., Viikari L. The laccase-catalyzed modification of lignin for enzymatic hydrolysis. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2011, 49:492-498.
46. Tejirian A., Xu F. Inhibition of enzymatic cellulolysis by phenolic compounds. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2011, 48:239-247.