Identifying common structural DNA properties in transcription factor binding site sets of the LacI-GalR family

Current Bioinformatics

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 483-488

  Meysman, Pieter ^a   Marchal, Kathleen ^a,b   Engelen, Kristof ^a,c  

^a Department of Microbial and Molecular Sciences ^*  (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Conditional random fields; CRoSSeD; DNA structure; LacI GalR family; Protein DNA interaction; Transcription factor

Indexed keywords

BINDING SITES; DNA; TRANSCRIPTION;

CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; CROSSED; DNA BINDING SITE; DNA STRUCTURE; LACI-GALR FAMILY; PROPERTY; PROTEIN-DNA INTERACTIONS; RANDOM FIELDS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR BINDING SITES;

TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

AMINO ACID; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; DNA STRUCTURE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EID: 84882769281     PISSN: 15748936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1574893611308040010     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Michael Gromiha M, Siebers JG, Selvaraj S, Kono H, Sarai A. Intermolecular and intramolecular readout mechanisms in protein-DNA recognition. J Mol Biol 2004; 337(2): 285-94.
2. Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature 2009; 461(7268): 1248-53.
3. Bauer AL, Hlavacek WS, Unkefer PJ, Mu F. Using sequencespecific chemical and structural properties of DNA to predict transcription factor binding sites. PLoS Comput Biol 2010; 6(11): e1001007.
4. Meysman P, Dang TH, Laukens K, et al. Use of structural DNA properties for the prediction of transcription-factor binding sites in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 39(2): e6.
5. Lafferty J. Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. Computer 1999.
6. Karas H, Knüppel R, Schulz W, Sklenar H, Wingender E. Combining structural analysis of DNA with search routines for the detection of transcription regulatory elements. Comput Appl Biosci 1996; 12(5): 441-6.
7. Kalodimos CG, Boelens R, Kaptein R. Toward an integrated model of protein-DNA recognition as inferred from NMR studies on the Lac repressor system. Chem Rev 2004; 104(8): 3567-86.
8. Spronk CA, Folkers GE, Noordman AM, et al. Hinge-helix formation and DNA bending in various lac repressor-operator complexes. The EMBO J 1999; 18(22): 6472-80.
9. Pace HC, Kercher MA, Lu P, et al. Lac repressor genetic map in real space. Trends in Biochem Sci 1997; 22(9): 334-9.
10. Camas FM, Alm EJ, Poyatos JF. Local gene regulation details a recognition code within the LacI transcriptional factor family. PLoS Comput Biol 2010; 6(11): e1000989.
11. Milk L, Daber R, Lewis M. Functional rules for lac repressoroperator associations and implications for protein-DNA interactions. Protein Sci 2010; 19(6): 1162-72.
12. Glasfeld A, Koehler AN, Schumacher MA, Brennan RG. The role of lysine 55 in determining the specificity of the purine repressor for its operators through minor groove interactions. J Mol Biol 1999; 291(2): 347-61.
13. Bell CE, Lewis M. A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator. Nat Struct Biol 2000; 7(3): 209-14.
14. Arvidson DN, Lu F, Faber C, Zalkin H, Brennan RG. The structure of PurR mutant L54M shows an alternative route to DNA kinking. Nat Struct Biol 1998; 5(6): 436-41.
15. Kallipolitis BH, Nørregaard-Madsen M, Valentin-Hansen P. Protein-protein communication: structural model of the repression complex formed by CytR and the global regulator CRP. Cell 1997; 89(7): 1101-9.
16. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 2003; 441.
17. Gama-Castro S, Salgado H, Peralta-Gil M, et al. RegulonDB version 7.0: transcriptional regulation of Escherichia coli K-12 integrated within genetic sensory response units (Gensor Units). Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39(Database issue): D98-105.
18. Sugimoto N. Improved thermodynamic parameters and helix initiation factor to predict stability of DNA duplexes. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24(22): 4501-4505.
19. Papadopoulos JS, Agarwala R. COBALT: constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics 2007; 23(9): 1073-9.
20. Glasfeld A, Koehler AN, Schumacher MA, Brennan RG. The role of lysine 55 in determining the specificity of the purine repressor for its operators through minor groove interactions. J Mol Biol 1999; 291(2): 347-61.
21. Stokes HW, Hall BG. Sequence of the ebgR gene of Escherichia coli: evidence that the EBG and LAC operons are descended from a common ancestor. Mol Biol Evol 1985; 2(6): 478-83.