Value of superficial cultures for prediction of catheter-related bloodstream infection in long-term catheters: A prospective study

Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 3025-3030

  Guembe, M ^a   Martin Rabadan P ^a   Echenagusia, A ^a   Camunez F ^a   Rodriguez Rosales G ^a   Simo G ^a   Echenagusia, M ^a   Bouza, E ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; BLOOD CULTURE; CANDIDA GLABRATA; CANDIDA PARAPSILOSIS; CANDIDA TROPICALIS; CATHETER INFECTION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENTEROBACTER CLOACAE; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FEMALE; FUNGAL COLONIZATION; FUNGUS ISOLATION; HUMAN; INFANT; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEUS MIRABILIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SERRATIA MARCESCENS; SKIN CULTURE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; STENOTROPHOMONAS MALTOPHILIA; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BACTERIA; BLOOD; CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FUNGI; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPSIS; SKIN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882762363     PISSN: 00951137     EISSN: 1098660X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01351-13     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Blot SI, Depuydt P, Annemans L, Benoit D, Hoste E, De Waele JJ, Decruyenaere J, Vogelaers D, Colardyn F, Vandewoude KH. 2005. Clinical and economic outcomes in critically ill patients with nosocomial catheter-related bloodstream infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:1591-1598.
2. Dimick JB, Pelz RK, Consunji R, Swoboda SM, Hendrix CW, Lipsett PA. 2001. Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch. Surg. 136:229-234.
3. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. 2006. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin. Proc. 81:1159-1171.
4. Renaud B, Brun-Buisson C; ICU-Bacteremia Study Group. 2001. Outcomes of primary and catheter-related bacteremia. A cohort and casecontrol study in critically ill patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 163: 1584-1590.
5. Warren DK, Quadir WW, Hollenbeak CS, Elward AM, Cox MJ, Fraser VJ. 2006. Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital. Crit. Care Med. 34:2084-2089.
6. Biffi R, de Braud F, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Mauri S, Goldhirsch A, Nole F, Andreoni B. 1998. Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days. Ann. Oncol. 9:767-773.
7. Crisinel M, Mahy S, Ortega-Debalon P, Buisson M, Favre JP, Chavanet P, Piroth L. 2009. Incidence, prevalence and risk factors for a first infectious complication on a totally implantable venous-access port. Med. Mal. Infect. 39:252-258. (In French.)
8. Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HT, Friedlander-Klar H, Brown AE, Kiehn TE, Armstrong D. 1993. Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer. Ann. Intern. Med. 119:1168-1174.
9. Hoen B, Paul-Dauphin A, Hestin D, Kessler M. 1998. EPIBACDIAL: a multicenter prospective study of risk factors for bacteremia in chronic hemodialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 9:869-876.
10. Kessler M, Hoen B, Mayeux D, Hestin D, Fontenaille C. 1993. Bacteremia in patients on chronic hemodialysis. A multicenter prospective survey. Nephron 64:95-100.
11. Kuizon D, Gordon SM, Dolmatch BL. 2001. Single-lumen subcutaneous ports inserted by interventional radiologists in patients undergoing chemotherapy: incidence of infection and outcome of attempted catheter salvage. Arch. Intern. Med. 161:406-410.
12. Wisplinghoff H, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. 2003. Current trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies and solid neoplasms in hospitals in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:1103-1110.
13. Cercenado E, Ena J, Rodriguez-Creixems M, Romero I, Bouza E. 1990. A conservative procedure for the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Arch. Intern. Med. 150:1417-1420.
14. Liñares J, Sitges-Serra A, Garau J, Pérez JL, Martín R. 1985. Pathogenesis of catheter sepsis: a prospective study with quantitative and semiquantitative cultures of catheter hub and segments. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:357-360.
15. Templeton A, Schlegel M, Fleisch F, Rettenmund G, Schobi B, Henz S, Eich G. 2008. Multilumen central venous catheters increase risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection: prospective surveillance study. Infection 36:322-327.
16. Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcala L, Perez MJ, Rincon C, Munoz P. 2007. A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:820-826.
17. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. 1977. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 296:1305-1309.
18. Sherertz RJ, Heard SO, Raad II. 1997. Diagnosis of triple-lumen catheter infection: comparison of roll plate, sonication, and flushing methodologies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:641-646.
19. Guembe M, Marin M, Martin-Rabadan P, Echenagusia A, Camunez F, Rodriguez-Rosales G, Simo G, Echenagusia M, Bouza E. 2013. Use of universal 16S rRNA gene PCR as a diagnostic tool for venous access portrelated bloodstream infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:799-804.
20. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJ, Sherertz RJ, Warren DK. 2009. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:1-45.
21. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph AG, Rupp ME, Saint S; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). 2011. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52:e162-e193.
22. Chang L, Tsai JS, Huang SJ, Shih CC. 2003. Evaluation of infectious complications of the implantable venous access system in a general oncologic population. Am. J. Infect. Control 31:34-39.
23. Fariñas MC, García-Palomo JD, Gutiérrez-Cuadra M. 2008. Infection associated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis catheters. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 26:518-526. (In Spanish.)
24. Grothe C, da Silva Belasco AG, de Cassia Bittencourt AR, Vianna LA, de Castro Cintra Sesso R, Barbosa DA. 2010. Incidence of bloodstream infection among patients on hemodialysis by central venous catheter. Rev. Lat. Am. Enfermagem. 18:73-80.
25. Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Andrus ML, Peterson KD, Dudeck MA, Horan TC. 2008. Dialysis surveillance report: National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)-data summary for 2006. Semin. Dial. 21:24-28.
26. Powe NR, Jaar B, Furth SL, Hermann J, Briggs W. 1999. Septicemia in dialysis patients: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis. Kidney Int. 55: 1081-1090.
27. Saeed Abdulrahman I, Al-Mueilo SH, Bokhary HA, Ladipo GO, Al-Rubaish A. 2002. A prospective study of hemodialysis access-related bacterial infections. J. Infect. Chemother. 8:242-246.
28. Eastridge BJ, Lefor AT. 1995. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 13:233-238.
29. Silas AM, Perrich KD, Hoffer EK, McNulty NJ. 2010. Complication rates and outcomes of 536 implanted subcutaneous chest ports: do rates differ based on the primary operator's level of training? Acad. Radiol. 17:464-467.
30. Walser EM. 2012. Venous access ports: indications, implantation technique, follow-up, and complications. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 35: 751-764.
31. Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E, Raynard B, Germann N, Antoun S, Laplanche A, Brun-Buisson C, Tancrede C. 1999. Diagnosis of catheterrelated bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures. Lancet 354:1071-1077.
32. Catton JA, Dobbins BM, Kite P, Wood JM, Eastwood K, Sugden S, Sandoe JA, Burke D, McMahon MJ, Wilcox MH. 2005. In situ diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: a comparison of quantitative culture, differential time to positivity, and endoluminal brushing. Crit. Care Med. 33:787-791.
33. Raad I, Hanna HA, Alakech B, Chatzinikolaou I, Johnson MM, Tarrand J. 2004. Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 140:18-25.
34. Ben-Ami R, Weinberger M, Orni-Wasserlauff R, Schwartz D, Itzhaki A, Lazarovitch T, Bash E, Aharoni Y, Moroz I, Giladi M. 2008. Time to blood culture positivity as a marker for catheter-related candidemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2222-2226.
35. Bouza E, Alcala L, Munoz P, Martin-Rabadan P, Guembe M, Rodriguez-Creixems M. 2013. Can. microbiologists help to assess catheter involvement in candidaemic patients before removal? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 19:E129-E135.
36. Raad I, Costerton W, Sabharwal U, Sacilowski M, Anaissie E, Bodey GP. 1993. Ultrastructural analysis of indwelling vascular catheters: a quantitative relationship between luminal colonization and duration of placement. J. Infect. Dis. 168:400-407.