First Steps Towards the Automatic Construction of Argument-Diagrams from Real Discussions

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 144, Issue , 2006, Pages 183-194

  Verbree, Daan ^a   Rienks, Rutger ^a   Heylen, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENT STRUCTURES; AUTOMATIC CONSTRUCTION; LEARN+; MEETING TRANSCRIPTS;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 84882761235     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. T.J. van Gelder. Argument mapping with reason!able. The American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 2002.
2. R.J. Rienks and D. Heylen. Argument diagramming of meeting conversations. In A. Vinciarelli and J-M. Odobez, editors, Multimodal Multiparty Meeting Processing, Workshop at the 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI), pages 85-92, Trento, Italy, October 2005.
3. S. Buckingham Shum. Negotiating the construction and reconstruction of organisational memories. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 3(8):899-928, 1997.
4. V. Pallotta, J. Niekrasz, and M. Purver. Collaborative and argumentative models of meeting discussions. In Proceeding of CMNA-05 international workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments (part of IJCAI 2005), July 2005.
5. D. Schum and A. Martin. Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence. Law and Society Review, 17(1):105-152, 1982.
6. G. Kanselaar, G. Erkens, J. Andriessen, M. Prangsma, A. Veerman, and J. Jaspers. Desiging argumentation tools for collaborative learning. In Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, pages 51-73. Springer Verlag, London, UK., 2003.
7. J. Yoshimi. Mapping the structure of debate. Informal Logic, 24(1), 2004.
8. A Veerman. Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, 2000.
9. W.C. Mann and S.A. Thompson. Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8:243-281, 1988.
10. H.C. Bunt. Conversational principles in question-answer dialogues. The theory of questions, 1979.
11. S. Toulmin. The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
12. W. Kunz and H.W.J. Rittel. Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper WP-131, Univ. Stuttgart, Inst. Fuer Grundlagen der Planung, 1970.
13. E. Van der Weijden. Structuring argumentation in meetings : Visualizing the argument structure. Master's thesis, University of Twente, November 2005.
14. M. Galley, K. McKeown, J. Hirschberg, and E. Shriberg. Identifying agreement and disagreement in conversational speech: Use of bayesian networks to model pragmatic dependencies. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 669-676, 2004.
15. J.L. Kestler. Questioning Techniques and Tactics. McGraw-Hill, 1982.
16. F. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, and F. Snoeck Henkemans. Argumentation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
17. F.H. Van Eemeren. A glance behind the scenes: The state of the art in the study of argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(1):1-23, 2003.
18. A. Neass. Communication and argument. Elements of applied semantics. George Allen & Uwin Press, 1966.
19. J. Moore, M. Kronenthal, and S. Ashby. Guidelines for AMI speech transcriptions. Technical report, IDIAP, Univ. of Edinburgh, February 2005.
20. J. Carletta, S. Ashby, S. Bourban, M. Flynn, M. Guillemot, T. Hain, J. Kadlec, V. Karaiskos, W. Kraaij, M. Kronenthal, G. Lathoud, M. Lincoln, A. Lisowska, I. McCowan, W. Post, D. Reidsma, and P. Wellner. The ami meetings corpus. In Proceedings of the Measuring Behavior 2005 symposium on "Annotating and measuring Meeting Behavior", 2005. AMI-108.
21. D. Reidsma, D.H.W. Hofs, and N. Jovanovic. A presentation of a set of new annotation tools based on the nxt api. Poster at Measuring Behaviour 2005, 2005. AMI-105.
22. D.N. Walton. Argument Structure, A pragmatic Theory. University of Toronto Press, 1996.
23. J. Cohen. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, (20):37-46, 1960.
24. S. Steidl, M. Levit, A. Batliner, E. Nöth, and H. Niemann. "of all things the measure is man" automatic classification of emotion and intra labeler consistency. In ICASSP 2005, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005.
25. S. Banerjee and T. Pedersen. The design, implementation, and use of the Ngram Statistic Package. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, Mexico City, February 2003.
26. K. Toutanova, D. Klein, and C. Manning. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In NAACL '03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, pages 173-180, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. J. Quinlan. C4.5 : programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, SanMateo, CA, USA, 1993.
28. A. T. Verbree. On the structuring of discussion transcripts based on utterances automatically classified. Master's thesis, University of Twente, June 2006.
29. J. Hirschberg and D. Litman. Empirical studies on the disambiguation of cue phrases. Comput. Linguist., 19(3):501-530, 1993.
30. N. Reithinger and M. Klesen. Dialogue act classification using language models. In Proceedings of EuroSpeech-97, pages 2235-2238, 1997.
31. N. Cathcart, J. Carletta, and E. Klein. A shallow model of backchannel continuers in spoken dialogue. In EACL '03: Proceedings of the tenth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 51-58, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics.
32. J. Huang and G. Zweig. Maximum entropy model for punctuation annotation from speech. Proc. Eurospeech, 2002.
33. P. Wellner, M. Flynn, and M. Guillemot. Browsing recorded meetings with ferret. In In Proceedings of MLMI'04. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
34. R.J. Rienks, A. Nijholt, and P. Barthelmess. Pro-active meeting assistants : Attention please! In Social Intelligence Design, Osaka, Japan, March 2006.
35. T.J. Van Gelder. How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary education, pages 539-548, 2001.