Unjust Enrichment (Dis)Contented

Understanding Unjust Enrichment

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 35-45

  Fridman, G H L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882707225     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. P Birks, An Introduction to the Law of Restitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1985) 17
2. A Burrows, The Law of Restitution (London, Butterworths, 1993) 1
3. G Virgo, The Principles of the Law of Restitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 6.
4. A Coleman, ‘The Concept of Unjust Enrichment in English Law’ (1979) 10 Cambrian Law Review 8.
5. S Hedley, Restitution: Its Division and Ordering (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2001)
6. J Dietrich, Restitution: A New Perspective (Leichhardt, NSW, Federation Press, 1998).
7. GHL Fridman, ‘The Quasi-Contractual Aspects of Unjust Enrichment’ (1956) 34 Canadian Bar Review 393.
8. K Mason and J Carter, Restitution Law in Australia(North Ryde, NSW, Butterworths, 1995) 73.
9. W Holdsworth, A History of English Law (London, Methuen & Co, 1903) vol 12, 543
10. G Jones, Hochelaga Lectures 2000—Unresolved Problems in the Law of Restitution (Hong Kong, Sweet & Maxwell, 2001) 28-49
11. P Winfield, The Law of Quasi-contracts (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1952).
12. JH Munkman, The Law of Quasi-contracts (London, Pitman, 1950).
13. SJ Stoljar, The Law of Quasi-contracts (Sydney, Law Book Co, 1964).
14. W Angus, ‘Restitution in Canada since the Deglman Case’ (1964) 42 Canadian Bar Review 529.
15. L Smith, ‘The Mystery of “Juristic Reason”’ (2000) 12 Supreme Court Law Review 211.
16. J Stone, Legal System and Lawyers’ Reasoning (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1964) 241-46
17. R Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Cambridge, Massachusetts, Belknap Press, 1986)