The fish invasiveness screening kit (FISK) for non-native freshwater fishes-a summary of current applications

Risk Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1394-1396

  Copp, Gordon H ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alien species prescreening; Hazard identification; Pheloung et al.; Weed risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; FISH; FRESHWATER; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; INVASIVE SPECIES; INVASIVENESS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

PISCES;

FRESH WATER;

ALGORITHM; ALIEN SPECIES PRESCREENING; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ECOLOGY; FISH; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVERTEBRATE; METHODOLOGY; PHELOUNG ET AL.; RISK ASSESSMENT; WEED RISK ASSESSMENT;

ALIEN SPECIES PRESCREENING; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; PHELOUNG ET AL.; WEED RISK ASSESSMENT;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; FISHES; FRESH WATER; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVERTEBRATES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84882686228     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12095     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management, 1999; 57:239-251.
2. Copp GH, Garthwaite R, Gozlan RE. Risk Identification and Assessment of Non-Native Freshwater Fishes: Concepts and Perspectives on Protocols for the UK. Lowestoft, UK: Cefas Science Technical Report, 2005. Available at: http://www.cefas.co.uk/publications/techrep/tech129.pdf, Accessed on May 9, 2013.
3. Copp GH, Vilizzi L, Mumford J, Fenwick GV, Godard MJ, Gozlan RE. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Risk Analysis, 2009; 29:457-467.
4. Vandenbergh K. Risicoanalyse voor uitheemse vissorten in Vlaanderen. PhD Thesis, Leuven, Belgium: Departement Biologie, Faculteit Wetenschappen, Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven, 2007.
5. Mastitsky SE, Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Adamovich BV. Non-native fishes of Belarus: Diversity, distribution, and risk classification using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK). Aquatic Invasions, 2010; 5:103-114.
6. Onikura N, Nakajima J, Inui R, Mizutani H, Kobayakawa M, Fukuda S, Mukai T. Evaluating the potential of invasion by non-native freshwater fishes in northern Kyushu Island, Japan, using the Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit. Ichthyological Research, 2012; 58:382-387.
7. Troca DFA, Vieira JP. 2012. Potential invasive non-native fish farmed in the coastal region of Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca do Estado de Sao Paulo, 2012; 38:109-120.
8. Mendoza R, Aguirre VS, Berúmen LG. Análisis de Riesgo de Especies Exóticas de Peces Ornamentales Dulceacuícolas Regularmente Importados en México. Mexico City: Informe técnico para el Instituto Nacional de Pesca, SAGARPA, 2010.
9. Lawson LL, Jr, Hill JE, Hardin S, Vilizzi L, Copp GH. Revisions of the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for its application in warmer climatic zones, with particular reference to peninsular Florida. Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(8)1414-1431.
10. Vilizzi L, Copp GH. Application of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes, in the Murray-Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia). Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(8):1432-1440.
11. Almeida Real D, Ribeiro F, Leunda PA, Vilizzi L, Copp GH. Effectiveness of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes, to perform risk identification assessments in the Iberian Peninsula. Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(8):1404-1413.
12. Puntila R, Vilizzi L, Lehtiniemi M, Copp GH. First application of FISK, the Freshwater Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit, in Northern Europe: Example of Southern Finland. Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(8):1404-1413.
13. Simonović P, Tošić A, Vassilev M, Apostolou A, Mrdak D, Ristovska M, Kostov V, Nikolić V, Škraba D, Vilizzi L, Copp GH. Risk assessment of non-native fishes in the Balkans Region using FISK, the invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Mediterranean Marine Science Journal, in press (doi: 0.12681/mms.337).
14. Bomford M, Glover J. Risk Assessment Model for the Import and Keeping of Exotic Freshwater and Estuarine Finfish. A Report Produced by the Bureau of Rural Sciences for the Department of Environment and Heritage. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government, Bureau of Rural Sciences, 2004. Available at: http://www.feral.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/finfish_risk_assessment.pdf, Accessed on January 30, 2012.
15. Moore A, Marton N, McNee A. A Strategic Approach to the Management of Ornamental Fish in Australia: Communication Strategy and Grey List Review-A Report to OFMIG. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government, Bureau of Rural Sciences, 2010. Available at: http://adl.brs.gov.au/data/warehouse/pe_brs90000004189/OrnamentalFishManagementReport2010_ap14.pdf, Accessed on January 30, 2012.
16. Clavero M. Assessing the risk of freshwater fish introductions into the Iberian peninsula. Freshwater Biology, 2011; 56:2145-2155.
17. Verbrugge LNH, Van der Velde G, Hendriks AJ, Verreycken H, Leuven RSEW. Risk classifications of aquatic non-native species: Application of contemporary European assessment protocols in different biogeographical settings. Aquatic Invasions, 2012; 7:49-58.
18. Snyder E, Mandrak NE, Niblock H, Cudmore B. Developing a Screening-Level Risk Assessment Prioritization Protocol for Aquatic Non-Indigenous Species in Canada: Review of Existing Protocols. Research Document 2012/097, Central and Arctic Region. Ottawa: Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, 2012. Available at: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Csas-sccs/publications/resdocs-docrech/2012/2012_097-eng.pdf, Accessed on June 4, 2013.
19. Tricarico E, Vilizzi L, Gherardi F, Copp GH. Calibration of FI-ISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater invertebrates. Risk Analysis, 2010; 30:285-292.
20. Copp GH, Britton JR, Jeney G, Joly J-P, Gherardi F, Gollasch S, Gozlan RE, Jones G, MacLeod A, Midtlyng PJ, Moissec L, Nunn AD, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Oidtmann B, Olenin S, Peeler EJ, Russell IC, Savini D, Tricarico E, Thrush M. Risk Assessment Protocols and Decision Making Tools for Use of Alien Species in Aquaculture and Stock Enhancement. Report to the European Commission, Project No.: 044142 (IMPASSE-Environmental Impacts of Alien Species in Aquaculture) for Coordination Action Priority FP6 2005-SSP-5A, Sustainable Management of Europe's Natural Resources. Brussels, 2008. Available at: http://www.cefas.defra.gov.uk/media/437410/impasse_44142_d3-2.pdf, Accessed on June 4, 2013.
21. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 708/2007 concerning use of alien and locally absent species in aquaculture. Official Journal of the European Union, 2007:L168/1-17.
22. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2007; 4:439-473.