Agent-Based computational economics using netlogo

Agent-Based Computational Economics Using Netlogo

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Damaceanu, Romulus Catalin ^a  

^a Universitatea Petre Andrei din Iasi   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882683413     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.2174/97816080548931130101     Document Type: Book

References (102)

1. Arrow, K.J.,&Debreu, G. (1964). Existence of an Equlibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica, 22, 265-290
2. Arthur, W.B.,&Durlauf, S.N., Lane, D.A. (Eds.). (1997). The economy as an evolving complex system II. MA: Addison-Wesley
3. Aruka, Y. (2001). Evolutionary Controversies in Economics: A New Transdisciplinary Approach. Tokyo and Berlin: Springer
4. Batten, D. (2000). Discovering artificial economics: How Agents Learn and Economies Evolve. CO Boulder: Westview Press
5. Boulding, K.E. (1991). What is evolutionary economics?. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 9-17.
6. Chen, S.H., Tai, C.C. (2006). On the Selection of Adaptive Algorithms in ABM: A Computational-Equivalence Approach. Computational Economics, 28, 51-69
7. Cohen K., Cyert R. (1961). Computer models in dynamic economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(1), 112-127
8. Damaceanu, R. C. (2010). Applied Computational Mathematics in Social Sciences. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers
9. Dawid, H.,&Reimann, M. (2005). Evaluating Market Attractiveness: Individual Incentives Versus Industry Profitability. Computational Economics, 24, 321-355
10. Day, D.,&Chen, P. (1993). Nonlinear Dynamics and Evolutionary Economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
11. Dinwiddy, C. L.,&Teal, F. J. (1988). The two-sector General Equlibrium Model: A new Approach. Oxford: Philip Allan
12. Dosi, G.&Orsenigo, L., (1994). Macrodynamics and microfoundations: an evolutionary perspective. In: Granstrand, O. (ed.). The economics of technology. Amsterdam: North Holland
13. Epstein, J.M.,&Axtell, R. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
14. Fagiolo, G.,&Dosi, G., Gabriele, R. (2004). Matching, Bargaining, and Wage Setting in an Evolutionary Model of Labor Market and Output Dynamics. Advances in Complex Systems, 14, 237-273.
15. Gardner, M. (1970). Mathematical Games - The fantastic combinations of John Conway's new solitaire game "life". Scientific American, 223, 120-123
16. Gilbert, N.,&Terna, P. (2000). How to build and use agent-based models in social science. Mind&Society, 1, 57-72
17. Gorobets, A., Nooteboom, B. (2006). Adaptive Build-up and Breakdown of Trust: An Agent Based Computational Approach. Journal of Management and Governance, 10, 277-306
18. Grebel, T.,&Pyka, A., Hanusch, H. (2003). An Evolutionary Approach to the Theory of the Entrepreneur. Industry and Innovation, 10, 493-514.
19. Haken, H. (1983). Advanced Synergetics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
20. Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics: An Introduction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
21. Heath, L. B. (2010). A Diagram for Conceptual Validation of Agent-based Models, A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Wright State University, http://etd.ohiolink.edu/sendpdf. cgi/Heath%20Brian%20L.pdf?wright1269176275;
22. Holland, J. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
23. Krugman, P. (1996). The self-organizing economy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers
24. Lorenz, E. (1963). Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130-141
25. Malthus, Th. R. (1826). An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: John Murray
26. Mandelbrot, B.B. (1989). Les objets fractals. Paris: Flammarion
27. Mandelbrot, B.B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
28. Marks, R.E. (2007). Validating Simulation Models: A General Framework and Four Applied Examples. Computational Economics, 30, 265-290
29. Marshall, A. (1923). Money, Credit, and Commerce. London: MacMillan and Co., Ltd.
30. Nelson, R.R.,&Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
31. Nelson, R.R. (1995). Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 48-90
32. Neumann, J. (1966). Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. Urbana and London: University of Illinois Press
33. Page, S.E. (1997). On Incentives and Updating in Agent Based Models. Computational Economics, 10, 67-87
34. Pareto, V. (1935). The Mind and Society [Trattato Di Sociologia Generale]. Harcourt: Brace
35. Prigogine, I. (1980). From being into Becoming: Time and Complexity in Physical Sciences. San Francisco: Freeman
36. Reynolds, C. (1987). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behaviour al model. Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 25-34
37. Ricardo, D. (1817). Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Reprinted in: Sraffa, P. (Ed.), (1951). The works and Correspondance of David Ricardo. London: Cambridge University Press
38. Sargent, T. (1993). Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford, UK: The Arne Ryde Memorial Lectures, Clarendon Press
39. Shoven, J.B.,&Whalley, J. (1992). Applying General Equlibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
40. Smale, S., (1967). Differential Dynamical Systems, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 73, 747-817
41. Smith, A. (1937). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Cannan Edition, American Modern Library Series
42. Sun, R. (2006). Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
43. Tesfatsion, L. (2002). Agent-based Computational Economics: Growing Economies from the Bottom Up. Working Paper, No.1, Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics
44. Tesfatsion, L. (2001a). Agent-based modelling of evolutionary economic systems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5, 1-6
45. Tesfatsion, L. (2001b). Structure, Behaviour , and Market Power in an Evolutionary Labor Market with Adaptive Search. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25, 419-457
46. Thom, R. (1972). Stabilite structurelle et Morphogenese. New York: Benjamin
47. Vega-Redondo, F. (1996). Evolution, Games, and Economic Behaviour . Oxford: Oxford University Press
48. Walras, L. (1954). Elements of Pure Economics. Homewood: Irwin
49. West, B.J. (1985). An Essay on the Importance of Being Nonlinear. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer
50. Young, H.P. (1998). Individual Strategy and Social Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
51. Zeeman, E.C. (1977). Catastrophe Theory: Selected Papers (1972-1977). Mass.: Addison-Wesley Reading
52. Damaceanu, R. C. (2011). Agent-based Computational Social Sciences using NetLogo. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
53. Damaceanu, R. C. (2010). Applied Computational Mathematics in Social Sciences. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers.
54. Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
55. Axelrod, R. M. (1997). Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Sciences. In Conte R., & Hegselmann, R., Terna P. (Eds.). Simulating Social Phenomena, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. 456, 21-40. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
56. Axtell, R. L.&Epstein, J. M. (1994). Agent-based Modeling: Understanding Our Creations. The Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute. Winter, 28-32
57. Christley, S.,&Xiang, X. Madey, G. (2004). Ontology for agent-based modeling and simulation.
58. In Macal C. M.,&Sallach, D., North, M. J. (Eds.). (2004) Proceedings of the Agent 2004 Conference on Social Dynamics: Interaction, Reflexivity and Emergence. Chicago, IL: Argonne National Laboratory and The University of Chicago. http://www.agent2005.anl.gov/Agent2004.pdf
59. Drogoul, A.,&Vanbergue, D., Meurisse, T. (2003). Multi-Agent Based Simulation: Where are the Agents?. In Sichman, J. S.,&Bousquet, F., Davidsson, P. (Eds.). Proceedings of MABS 2002 Multi-Agent-Based Simulation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2581, 1-15. Bologna, Italy: Springer-Verlag
60. Edmonds, B. (2001). The Use of Models - making MABS actually work. In Moss, S.&Davidsson, P. (Eds.). Multi-Agent-Based Simulation, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1979. 15-32. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
61. Gilbert, N. (2007). Agent-Based Models. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications.
62. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition. 5(2), 199-220
63. Izquierdo, L. R.&Polhill, J. G. (2006). Is your model susceptible to floating point errors?. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 9(4), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/4/4.html.
64. Kleijnen, J. P. C. (1995). Verification and validation of simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research. 82(1), 145-162.
65. Moss, S.,&Edmonds, B., Wallis, S. (1997). Validation and Verification of Computational Models with Multiple Cognitive Agents. Centre for Policy Modelling Report. 97-25, http://cfpm.org/cpmrep25.html.
66. Pignotti, E.,&Edwards, P., Preece, A., Polhill, J. G, Gotts, N. M. (2005) Semantic support for computational land-use modelling. 5th International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID 2005). 840-847. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
67. Polhill, J. G.&Gotts, N. M. (2006). A new approach to modelling frameworks. Proceedings of the First World Congress on Social Simulation. 50-57. Kyoto.
68. Polhill, J. G.,&Izquierdo, L. R., Gotts, N. M. (2005a). The ghost in the model (and other effects of floating point arithmetic). Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 8(1) http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/1/5.html.
69. Polhill, J. G.&Izquierdo, L. R. (2005b). Lessons learned from converting the artificial stock market to interval arithmetic. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 8(2), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/2/2.html.
70. Polhill, J. G.,&Izquierdo, L. R., Gotts, N. M. (2006). What every agent-based modeller should know about floating point arithmetic. Environmental Modelling&Software. 21(3), 283-309
71. Polhill, J. G.,&Pignotti, E., Gotts, N. M, Edwards, P., Preece, A. (2007). A Semantic Grid Service for Experimentation with an Agent-Based Model of Land-Use Change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 10(2), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/2/2.html.
72. Richiardi, M.,&Leombruni, R., Saam, N. J., Sonnessa, M. (2006). A Common Protocol for Agent-Based Social Simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 9(1), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/15.html.
73. Sansores, C.,&Pavón, J. (2005). Agent-based simulation replication: A model driven architecture approach. In Gelbukh, A. F.,&de Albornoz, A., Terashima-Marín, H. (Eds.). MICAI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 4th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Monterrey, Mexico, November 14-18, 2005, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 3789, 244-253. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
74. Sargent, R. G. (2003). Verification and Validation of Simulation Models. In Chick S, Sánchez P J, Ferrin D, and Morrice, D. J., (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. 37-48. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
75. Stanislaw, H. (1986). Tests of computer simulation validity. What do they measure?. Simulation and Games. 17, 173-191
76. Taylor, A. J. (1983). The Verification of Dynamic Simulation Models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34(3), 233-242
77. Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University
78. Banks, J., Carson, J.S., Nelson, B.L. (1996). Discrete event system simulation. 2d ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
79. Damaceanu, R.C., (2007). Using Netlogo in the training-learning process of Social Sciences. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii " Alexandru Ioan Cuza" - Sect. Stiintele Educatiei, 11, 55-64
80. Damaceanu, R.C. (2008a). An agent-based computational study of wealth distribution in function of resource growth interval using NetLogo. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 201, 371-377
81. Damaceanu, R.C. (2008b). A comparative analysis of three multiagent computational algorithms used to Harvest grain. Lucrari Stiintifice - Seria Agronomie, 51, 186-191
82. Damaceanu, R.C. (2010). A Multi-Agent Computational Model of Trade. Year-Book "Petre Andrei" University from Iasi, Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Sciences - THE IMPLICATIONS OF GLOBAL FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS ON THE ROMANIAN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT, 1, 135-152
83. Damaceanu, R.C. (2011a). Agent-based Computational Social Sciences using NetLogo. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing
84. Damaceanu, R.C. (2011b). An Agent-based Computational Study of Wealth Distribution in Function of Technological Progress Using Netlogo. American Journal of Economics. 1, 15-20
85. Damaceanu, R.C. (2011c). Agent-based Computational Social Sciences using NetLogo. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
86. Damaceanu, R.C., Capraru, B.S., (2012). Implementation of a multi-agent computational model of retail banking market using NetLogo. Metalurgia International, 17, 230-235
87. Hood, S.J., Welch, P.D. (1992). Experimental design issues in simulation with examples from semiconductor manufacturing. In Swain, J.J., Goldsman, D., Crain, R.C., and Wilson, J.R. (ed.). Proceedings of the 1992 Winter Simulation Conference. WSC Board of Directors: 255-63.
88. Kelton, W.D. (1997). Statistical analysis of simulation output. In Andradóttir S, Healy KJ, Withers DH, Nelson BL (eds.). Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference. WSC Board of Directors: 23-30.
89. Kelton, W.D., Sadowski, R.P., Sadowski, D.A. (2002). Simulation with Arena - 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill
90. Kennedy, M.C., O'Hagan, A. (2000). Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika. 87: 1-13.
91. Kleijnen, J.P.C. (1998). Experimental design for sensitivity analysis, optimization, and validation of simulation models. In Banks, J. (ed.). Handbook of simulation, New York: John Wiley: 173-223.
92. Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D. (1991). Simulation modeling and analysis. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw- Hill
93. Reese, C.S., Wilson, A.G., Hamada, M., Martz, H.F., Ryan, K.J. (2004). Integrated analysis of computer and physical experiments. Technometrics. 46, 153-164
94. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP, Wynn HP. (1989). Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Statistical Science. 4(4), 433-435
95. Santner, T.J., Williams, B.J., Notz, W.I. (2003). The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Berlin: Springer
96. Sieburg, H.B. (1990) Physiological Studies in silico. Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. 12, 321-342
97. Swain J.J., Farrington, P.A. (1994) Designing simulation experiments for evaluating manufacturing systems. In Tew, J.D., Manivannan, M.S., Sadowski, D.A., Seila, A.F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference. WSC Board of Directors: 69-76.
98. Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University
99. Schwab, K. (Ed.) (2009). World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010, SRO-Kundig, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2009- 10.pdf
100. Muldur, U., et al., (2006). A New Deal for an Effective European Research Policy, Springer
101. Stajano, A. (2009). Research, Quality, Competitiveness. EU Technology Policy fro the Knowledgebased Society, Springer
102. Taylor, M.D. (2006). International competition law: a new dimension for the WTO?. Cambridge University Press.