Feedback of personal retinal images appears to have a motivational impact in people with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and suboptimal HbA1c: Findings of a pilot study

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1122-1125

  Rees, G ^a   Lamoureux, E L ^a,b   Nicolaou, T E ^a   Hodgson, L A B ^a   Weinman, J ^c   Speight, J ^d,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d THE AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH IN DIABETES   (Australia)

^e DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f AHP Research   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETINA IMAGE; SELF CARE; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

AGED; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; ORTHOPTICS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PILOT PROJECTS; RETINA; SELF CARE; TERTIARY HEALTHCARE; VICTORIA; VISION DISORDERS;

EID: 84882661442     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12192     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Stratton IM, Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Turner RC, Holman RR, Manley SE et al. UKPDS 50: Risk factors for incidence and progression of retinopathy in Type II diabetes over 6 years from diagnosis. Diabetologia 2001; 44: 156-163.
2. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 1707-1715.
3. Hollands GJ, Hankins M, Marteau TM. Visual feedback of individuals' medical imaging results for changing health behaviour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 1: CD007434.
4. Scanlon PH. The preferences of people with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabet Med 2012; 29: 836-837.
5. Lamoureux EL, Fenwick E, Xie J, McAuley A, Nicolaou T, Larizza M et al. Methodology and early findings of the Diabetes Management Project: a cohort study investigating the barriers to optimal diabetes care in diabetic patients with and without diabetic retinopathy. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012; 40: 73-82.
6. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs-an extension of the modified airlie house classification. ETDRS report no. 10. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 786-806.
7. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 2006; 60: 631-637.
8. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH. Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Ann Fam Med 2008; 6: 246-252.
9. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 943-950.
10. Shahab L, West R, McNeill A. A randomized, controlled trial of adding expired carbon monoxide feedback to brief stop smoking advice: evaluation of cognitive and behavioural effects. Health Psychol 2011; 30: 49-57.
11. Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, Haas LB, Hosey GM, Jensen B et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: S87-S94.
12. Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S. Prediction and intervention in health-related behaviour: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl SocPsychol 2000; 30: 106-143.