Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 552-560

  Robertson, Bruce A ^a,b   Rehage, Jennifer S ^c   Sih, Andrew ^d  

^a BARD COLLEGE   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; EMERGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; NATURE CONSERVATION; PERSISTENCE; PLASTICITY; TRAP (EQUIPMENT);

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; PERCEPTION; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION;

EID: 84882641410     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Sih A., et al. Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change. Evol. Appl. 2011, 4:367-387.
2. Dwernychuk L.W., Boag D.A. Ducks nesting in association with gulls: an ecological trap?. Can. J. Zool. 1972, 50:559-563.
3. Schlaepfer M.A., et al. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:474-480.
4. Gilroy J.J., Sutherland W.J. Beyond ecological traps: perceptual errors and undervalued resources. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:351-356.
5. Delibes M., et al. Attractive sinks, or how individual behavioural decisions determine source-sink dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4:401-403.
6. Fletcher R.J., et al. How the type of anthropogenic change alters the consequences of ecological traps. Proc. R. Soc. B 2012, 279:2546-2552.
7. Robertson B.A., Hutto R.L. A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 2006, 87:1075-1085.
8. Weldon A.J., Haddad N.M. The effects of patch shape on indigo buntings: evidence for an ecological trap. Ecology 2005, 86:1422-1431.
9. Balme G.A., et al. Edge effects and the impact of non-protected areas in carnivore conservation: leopards in the Phinda-Mkhuze Complex, South Africa. Anim. Conserv. 2010, 13:315-323.
10. Semeniuk C.A.D., Rothley K.D. Costs of group-living for a normally solitary forager: effects of provisioning tourism on southern stingrays Dasyatis americana. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 357:271-282.
11. Hagman M., et al. Fatal attraction: adaptations to prey on native frogs imperil snakes after invasion of toxic toads. Proc. R. Soc. B 2009, 276:2813-2818.
12. Semeniuk C.A.D., et al. Hematological differences between stingrays at tourist and non-visited sites suggest physiological costs of wildlife tourism. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:1818-1829.
13. Tuxbury S.M., Salmon M. Competitive interactions between artificial lighting and natural cues during seafinding by hatchling marine turtles. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 121:311-316.
14. Hallier J.P., et al. Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 353:255-264.
15. Keefer M., et al. Behavioral thermoregulation and associated mortality trade-offs in migrating adult steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss): variability among sympatric populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009, 66:1734-1747.
16. Jaquemet S., et al. Do drifting and anchored fish aggregating devices (FADs) similarly influence tuna feeding habits? A case study from the western Indian Ocean. Fish. Res. 2011, 107:283-290.
17. Leighton P.A., et al. Predicting species interactions from edge responses: mongoose predation on hawksbill sea turtle nests in fragmented beach habitat. Proc. R. Soc. B 2008, 275:2465-2472.
18. D'Amore A., et al. Reproductive interference by an invasive species: an evolutionary trap?. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 4:325-330.
19. Zugmeyer C.A., Koprowski J.L. Severely insect-damaged forest: a temporary trap for red squirrels?. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:464-470.
20. Martinez-Abrain A., et al. Hunting sites as ecological traps for coots in southern Europe: implications for the conservation of a threatened species. Endang. Sp. Res. 2007, 3:69-76.
21. Robertson B.A., Hutto R.L. Is selectively harvested forest an ecological trap for olive-sided flycatchers?. Condor 2007, 109:109-121.
22. Ward-Fear G., et al. Maladaptive traits in invasive species: in Australia, cane toads are more vulnerable to predatory ants than are native frogs. Funct. Ecol. 2009, 23:559-568.
23. Hallier J., Gaertner D. Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 353:255-264.
24. Kriska G., et al. Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera. J. Exp. Biol. 1998, 201:2273-2286.
25. Firlej A., et al. Impact of host behavioral defenses on parasitization efficacy of a larval and adult parasitoid. Biocontrol 2010, 55:339-348.
26. Krebs J.R., Davies N.B. Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach 1997, Blackwell Scientific Publications. 4th edn.
27. Stephens D.W., et al. Foraging. Behavior and Ecology 2007, University of Chicago Press.
28. Kriska G., et al. Glass buildings on river banks as 'polarized light traps' for mass-swarming polarotactic caddis flies. Naturwissenschaften 2008, 95:461-467.
29. Hedin J., et al. Forest fuel piles as ecological traps for saproxylic beetles in oak. Scand. J. For. Res. 2008, 23:348-357.
30. Grémillet D., et al. A junk-food hypothesis for gannets feeding on fishery waste. Proc. R. Soc. B 2008, 275:1149-1156.
31. Rodewald A.D., et al. Dynamic selective environments and evolutionary traps in human-dominated landscapes. Ecology 2011, 92:1781-1788.
32. Kokko H., Sutherland W.J. Ecological traps in changing environments: ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2001, 3:537-551.
33. Kloskowski J. Fish stocking creates an ecological trap for an avian predator via effects on prey availability. Oikos 2012, 121:1567-1576.
34. Keesing F., et al. Hosts as ecological traps for the vector of Lyme disease. Proc. R. Soc. B 2009, 276:3911-3919.
35. Mänd R., et al. Provision of nestboxes raises the breeding density of great tits Parus major equally in coniferous and deciduous woodland. Ibis 2009, 151:487-492.
36. Severns P.M. Habitat restoration facilitates an ecological trap for a locally rare, wetland-restricted butterfly. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2011, 4:184-191.
37. Schlaepfer M.A., et al. Introduced species as evolutionary traps. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:241-246.
38. Pelicice F., Agostinho A.A. Fish-passage facilities as ecological traps in large neotropical rivers. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:180-188.
39. Jeffres C., et al. When good fish make bad decisions: Coho salmon in an ecological trap. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 2012, 32:87-92.
40. Ekroos J., et al. Philopatric predisposition to predation-induced ecological traps: habitat-dependent mortality of breeding eiders. Oecologia 2012, 170:979-986.
41. Hawlena D., et al. Ecological trap for desert lizards caused by anthropogenic changes in habitat structure that favor predator activity. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:803-809.
42. Schlaepfer M.A., et al. Decision-making, environmental change and population persistence. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology 2010, 506-515. Oxford University Press, USA. D. Westneat, C. Fox (Eds.).
43. Sih A., et al. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:372-378.
44. Sih A., et al. Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q. Rev. Biol. 2004, 79:241-277.
45. Sih A., Bell A.M. Insights for behavioral ecology from behavioral syndromes. Adv. Study Behav. 2008, 38:227-281.
46. Sih A., Giudice M.D. Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:2762-2772.
47. Van Dyck H. Changing organisms in rapidly changing anthropogenic landscapes: the significance of the 'Umwelt'-concept and functional habitat for animal conservation. Evol. Appl. 2012, 5:144-153.
48. McNamara J.M., et al. Cues and the optimal timing of activities under environmental changes. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:1183-1190.
49. Tufto J. The evolution of plasticity and nonplastic spatial and temporal adaptations in the presence of imperfect environmental cues. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:121-130.
50. Chan A.A.Y-H., Blumstein D.T. Attention, noise, and implications for wildlife conservation and management. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011, 131:1-7.
51. Rosenthal G.G., Stuart-Fox D.M. Environmental disturbance and animal communication. Behavioural Responses to a Changing world: Mechanisms and Consequences 2012, 16-27. Oxford University Press. U. Candolin, B. Wong (Eds.).
52. Ferrari M.C.O., et al. Effects of ocean acidification on visual risk assessment in coral reef fishes. Funct. Ecol. 2012, 26:553-558.
53. Chittka L., et al. Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:400-407.
54. Trimmer P.C., et al. Mammalian choices: combining fast-but-inaccurate and slow-but-accurate decision-making systems. Proc. R. Soc. B 2008, 275:2353-2361.
55. Sih A. Prey uncertainty and the balancing of antipredator and feeding needs. Am. Nat. 1992, 139:1052-1069.
56. Galef B.G., Giraldeau L.A. Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Anim. Behav. 2001, 61:3-15.
57. Galef B.G., Laland K.N. Social learning in animals: empirical studies and theoretical models. BioScience 2005, 55:489-499.
58. López-Sepulcre A., Kokko H. Understanding behavioural responses of populations and their consequences. Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences 2012, 3-15. Oxford University Press. U. Candolin, B. Wong (Eds.).
59. Nocera J.J., et al. Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 2006, 273:349-355.
60. Hollander F.A., et al. Maladaptive habitat selection of a migratory passerine bird in a human-modified landscape. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e25703.
61. Sachs J. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time 2006, Penguin Books.
62. Wright R. A Short History of Progress 2005, Da Capo Press.
63. Wey T., et al. Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim. Behav. 2008, 75:333-344.
64. Kristan W.B. The role of habitat selection behavior in population dynamics: source-sink systems and ecological traps. Oikos 2003, 103:457-468.
65. Witherington B.E. The problem of photopollution for sea turtles and other nocturnal animals. Behavioral Approaches to Conservation in the Wild 1997, 303-328. Cambridge University Press. J.R. Clemons, R. Bucholz (Eds.).
66. Horváth G., et al. Reducing the maladaptive attractiveness of solar panels to polarotactic insects. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:1644-1653.
67. Resetarits W.J., Binckley C.A. Spatial contagion of predation risk affects colonization dynamics in experimental aquatic landscapes. Ecology 2009, 90:869-876.
68. Burton A.C., et al. Hierarchical multi-species modeling of carnivore responses to hunting, habitat and prey in a West African protected area. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e38007.
69. Blumstein D.T., Fernandez-Juricic E. A Primer of Conservation Behavior 2010, Sinauer Associates. 1st edn.
70. Chalfoun A.D., Schmidt K.A. Adaptive breeding-habitat selection: Is it for the birds?. Auk 2012, 129:589-599.
71. Caro T., Sherman P. Behavioural ecology cannot profit from unstructured environmental change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:321-322.
72. Hobbs R.J., et al. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:599-605.
73. Crespi B.J. The evolution of maladaptation. Heredity 2000, 84(Pt 6):623-629.
74. Gwynne D.T., Rentz D.C.F. Beetles on the bottle: male buprestids mistake stubbies for females (Coleoptera). Aust. J. Entomol. 1984, 22:79-80.
75. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection Theory: A User's Guide 2004, Psychology Press. 2nd edn.
76. Northrup J.M., et al. Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears. Anim. Conserv. 2012, 15:369-377.
77. Donovan T.M., Thompson F.R. Modeling the ecological trap hypothesis: a habitat and demographic analysis for migrant songbirds. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11:871-882.