Response times to conceptual questions

American Journal of Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 703-706

  Lasry, Nathaniel ^a   Watkins, Jessica ^b,c,e   Mazur, Eric ^b,c   Ibrahim, Ahmed ^d  

^a JOHN ABBOTT COLLEGE   (Canada)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882637734     PISSN: 00029505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1119/1.4812583     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cole M. Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline 1996, (Harvard U.P., Cambridge, MA, ).
2. Gardner H. The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution 1985, (Basic Books, New York, NY, ).
3. Ratcliff R. van Zandt T. McKoon G. Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychol. Rev. 1999, 106(2):261-300. 10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.261.
4. Wise S.L. DeMars C.E. An application of item response time: The effort-moderated IRT model. J. Educ. Meas. 2006, 43(1):19-38. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00002.x.
5. Wise S.L. Kong X.J. Response time effort: A new measure of examinee motivation in computer-based tests. Appl. Meas. Educ. 2005, 18(2):163-183. 10.1207/s15324818ame1802_2.
6. Mislevy R. Foundations of a new test theory. Test theory for a new generation of tests 1993, N. Frederiksen, R. Mislevy, I. Bejar, in edited by and (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, ).
7. Schnipke D.L. Scrams D.J. Modeling item response times with a two-state mixture model: A new method of measuring speededness. J. Educ. Meas. 1997, 34(3):213-232. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1997.tb00516.x.
8. Abdelfattah F. Response latency effects on classical and item response theory parameters using different scoring procedures. College of Education 2007, 167. in (Ohio University, OH, ), p.
9. Tatsuoka K.K. Tatsuoka M.M. model for including response time data in scoring achievement tests. 1979 computerized adaptive testing conference 1997 in (Minneapolis, MN., ).
10. Schnipke D.L. Scrams D.J. Exploring issues of examinee behavior: Insights gained from response time analyses. in Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments 1997, C. N. Mills edited by (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, ).
11. Hestenes D. Wells M. Swackhammer G. Force Concept Inventory. Phys. Teach. 1992, 30:141-158. 10.1119/1.2343497.
12. Halloun I.A. Revised Force Concept Inventory 1997, appearing in Ref. 14.
13. Crouch C. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. Am. J. Phys. 2001, 69(9):970-977. 10.1119/1.1374249.
14. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual 1997, (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, ).
15. van der Linden W. A hierarchical framework for modeling speed and accuracy on test items. Psychometrika 2007, 72(3):287-308. 10.1007/s11336-006-1478-z, .
16. See supplementary material at E-AJPIAS-81-014308 for more detailed information on response time per question.
17. Halloun I.A. Hestenes D. Common-Sense Concepts About Motion. Am. J. Phys. 1985, 53(11):1056-1065. 10.1119/1.14031.
18. Halloun I.A. Hestenes D. The initial knowledge state of college physics. Students. Am. J. Phys. 1985, 53(11):1043-1055. 10.1119/1.14030.
19. Hammer D. Elby A. Scherr R.E. Redish E.F. Resources, framing, and transfer. Transfer of Learning: Research and Perspectives 2004, J. Mestre in edited by (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, ).
20. Redish E.F. A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI 2004 2004, in (Italian Physical Society, Varenna, Italy, ).
21. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual 1997, (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., ).