Voluntary electricity conservation of households after the Great East Japan earthquake: A stated preference analysis

Energy Economics

Volumn 39, Issue , 2013, Pages 296-304

  Tanaka, Makoto ^a   Ida, Takanori ^b  

^a NATIONAL GRADUATE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Electricity conservation; Great east japan earthquake; Power shortage; Stated preference analysis

Indexed keywords

AIR CONDITIONING; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EARTHQUAKES; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; GEOPHYSICS; NUCLEAR FUELS; STATISTICAL METHODS; SURVEYS;

CONJOINT ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY CONSERVATION; GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKES; POWER SHORTAGE; STATED PREFERENCES;

ENERGY CONSERVATION;

AIR CONDITIONING; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY; NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE 2011; VOLUNTARY APPROACH;

JAPAN;

EID: 84882596372     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, ANRE, 2011. Estimation for Demand Structure of Maximum Electric Power Consumption in Summer Peak (in Japanese).
2. Dubin, J.A., McFadden, D.L 1984. An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica 52 (2), 345-362.
3. Energy Conservation Center, Japan, ECCJ, 2004. Report on Various Activities and Energy Conservation Effects regarding Energy Conservation Lifestyle Check 25 (in Japanese).
4. Energy Conservation Center, Japan, ECCJ, 2008. Report on Electric Power Consumption by Appliances in Standby Mode (in Japanese).
5. Faruqui, A., Sergici, S. 2010. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. J. Regul. Econ. 38, 193-225.
6. Hausman, J.A. 1979. Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables. Bell J. Econ. 10 (1), 33-54.
7. Hausman, J.A., Trimble, J., 1984. Appliance purchase and usage adaptation to a permanent time-of-day electricity rate schedule. J. Econ. 26 (1-2), 115-139.
8. Herriges, J.A., King, K.K., 1994. Residential demand for electricity under inverted block rates: evidence from a controlled experiment. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 12 (4), 419-430.
9. Hidrue, M.K., Parsons, G.R., Kempton, W., Gardner, M.P., 2011. Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 33, 686-705.
10. Matsukawa, I., 2001. Household response to optional peak-load pricing of electricity. J. Regul. Econ. 20 (3), 249-267.
11. Piette, M.A., Ghatikar, G., Kiliccote, S., Palensky, P., McParland, C., Koch, E., Hennage, D., 2009. Open Automated Demand Response Communications Specification (Version 1.0). Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
12. Revelt, D., Train, K., 1998. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80 (4), 647-657.
13. Tokyo Electric Power Company Inc., TEPCO, 2011. Estimation of Electricity Conservation Effects on a Maximum Electric Power Consumption Day (in Japanese).
14. Train, K., Mehrez, G., 1994. Optional time-of-use prices for electricity: econometric analysis of surplus and pareto impacts. RAND J. Econ. 25 (2), 263-283.