Evaluation of an organic light-emitting diode display for precise visual stimulation

Journal of Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Ito, Hiroyuki ^a   Ogawa, Masaki ^b   Sunaga, Shoji ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CRT; Display device; LCD; OLED display; Visual stimulus

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATHODE RAY TUBE; COMPUTER TERMINAL; CRT; DISPLAY DEVICE; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION STUDY; ILLUMINATION; LCD; LIQUID CRYSTAL; LUMINESCENCE; OLED DISPLAY; PHOTOMETRY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; SEMICONDUCTOR; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CRT; DISPLAY DEVICE; LCD; OLED DISPLAY; VISUAL STIMULUS;

CATHODE RAY TUBE; COMPUTER TERMINALS; LIGHTING; LIQUID CRYSTALS; LUMINESCENCE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHOTOMETRY; SEMICONDUCTORS;

EID: 84882595555     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/13.7.6     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bach, M., & Meigen, T. (1992). Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential. Vision Research, 32(3), 417-424.
2. Bach, M., Meigen, T., & Strasburger, H. (1997). Raster-scan cathode-ray tubes for vision researchlimits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 403-414.
3. Bohnsack, D. L., Diller, L. C., Yeh, T., Jenness, J. W., & Troy, J. B. (1997). Characteristics of the Sony Multiscan 17se Trinitron color graphics display. Spatial Vision, 10, 345-351.
4. Elze, T. (2010a). Achieving precise display timing in visual neuroscience experiments. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 191, 171-179.
5. Elze, T. (2010b). Misspecifications of stimulus presentation durations in experimental psychology: A systematic review of the psychophysics literature. PLoS One, 5(9), e12792.
6. Haig, C. (1941). The course of rod dark adaptation as influenced by the intensity and duration of preadaptation to light. Journal of General Physiology, 24, 735-751.
7. Kihara, K., Kawahara, J., & Takeda, Y. (2010). Usability of liquid crystal displays for research in the temporal characteristsics of perception and attention. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1105-1113.
8. Krantz, J. H. (2000). Tell me, what did you see? The stimulus on computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(2), 221-229.
9. Lagroix, H. E. P., Yanko, M. R., & Spalek, T. M. (2012). LCDs are better: Psychophysical and photometric estimates of the temporal characteristics of CRT and LCD monitors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 1033-1041.
10. Metha, A. B., Vingrys, A. J., & Badcock, D. R. (1993). Calibration of a color monitor for visual psychophysics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 371-383.
11. Mulligan, J. B., & Stone, L. S. (1989). Halftoning method for the generation of motion stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 6, 1217-1227.
12. Pelli, D. G. (1997). Pixel independence: Measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
13. Stockman, A., & Sharpe, L. T. (2006). Into the twilight zone: The complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 26(3), 225-239.
14. Ramanath, R. (2009). Minimizing observer metamerism in display systems. Color Research & Application, 34(5), 391-398.
15. Wang, P., & Nikolic, D. (2011). An LCD monitor with sufficiently precise timing for research in vision. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 85.