Neurological outcome scale for traumatic brain injury: III. Criterion-related validity and sensitivity to change in the NABIS hypothermia-II clinical trial

Journal of Neurotrauma

Volumn 30, Issue 17, 2013, Pages 1506-1511

  McCauley, Stephen R ^a,b,c   Wilde, Elisabeth A ^a,b,c   Moretti, Paolo ^b,c   Macleod, Marianne C ^a   Pedroza, Claudia ^a   Drever, Pamala ^d   Fourwinds, Sierra ^e   Frisby, Melisa L ^a   Beers, Sue R ^f   Scott, James N ^g   Hunter, Jill V ^b,h   Traipe, Elfrides ^b,h   Valadka, Alex B ⁱ   Okonkwo, David O ^j   Zygun, David A ^g,k   Puccio, Ava M ^j   Clifton, Guy L ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^e Silverwind Research   (United States)

^f CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^h TEXAS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁱ Seton Brain and Spine Institute   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Assessment tools; Neuropsychology; Outcome measures; Recovery; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; FEMALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; INJURY SEVERITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROBEHAVIORAL RATING SCALE REVISED; NEUROLOGICAL OUTCOME SCALE FOR TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; RANK SUM TEST; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; FEMALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMANS; HYPOTHERMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882581717     PISSN: 08977151     EISSN: 15579042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.2925     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Jennett, B., and Bond, M. (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1, 480-484
2. Wilson, J.T., Pettigrew, L.E., and Teasdale, G.M. (1998). Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. J. Neurotrauma 15, 573-585
3. McCauley, S.R., Wilde, E.A., Kelly, T.M., Weyand, A.M., Yallampalli, R., Waldron, E.J., Pedroza, C., Schnelle, K.P., Boake, C., Levin, H.S., and Moretti, P. (2010). The Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI): II. Reliability and convergent validity. J. Neurotrauma 27, 991-997
4. Wilde, E.A., McCauley, S.R., Kelly, T.M., Weyand, A.M., Pedroza, C., Levin, H.S., Clifton, G.L., Schnelle, K.P., Shah, M.V., and Moretti, P. (2010). The Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI): I. Construct validity. J. Neurotrauma 27, 983-989
5. Wilde, E.A., McCauley, S.R., Kelly, T.M., Levin, H.S., Pedroza, C., Clifton, G.L., Robertson, C.S., Valadka, A.B., and Moretti, P. (2010). Feasibility of the Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI) in adults. J. Neurotrauma 27, 975-981
6. Wilde, E.A., Whiteneck, G.G., Bogner, J., Bushnik, T., Cifu, D.X., Dikmen, S., French, L., Giacino, J.T., Hart, T., Malec, J.F., Millis, S.R., Novack, T.A., Sherer, M., Tulsky, D.S., Vanderploeg, R.D., and von Steinbuechel, N. (2010). Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 91, 1650-1660
7. McCauley, S.R., Wilde, E.A., Anderson, V.A., Bedell, G., Beers, S.R., Campbell, T.F., Chapman, S.B., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Gerring, J.P., Gioia, G.A., Levin, H.S., Michaud, L.J., Prasad, M.R., Swaine, B.R., Turkstra, L.S., Wade, S.L., and Yeates, K.O.; Pediatric TBI Outcomes Workgroup. (2012). Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research. J. Neurotrauma 29, 678-705
8. Teasdale, G., and Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2, 81-84
9. Clifton, G.L., Valadka, A., Zygun, D., Coffey, C.S., Drever, P., Fourwinds, S., Janis, L.S., Wilde, E., Taylor, P., Harshman, K., Conley, A., Puccio, A., Levin, H.S., McCauley, S.R., Bucholz, R.D., Smith, K.R., Schmidt, J.H., Scott, J.N., Yonas, H., and Okonkwo, D.O. (2011). Very early hypothermia induction in patients with severe brain injury (the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia II): A randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 10, 131-139
10. Clifton, G.L., Hayes, R.L., Levin, H.S., Michel, M.E., and Choi, S.C. (1992). Outcome measures for clinical trials involving traumatically brain-injured patients: Report of a conference. Neurosurgery 31, 975-978
11. Jennett, B., Snoek, J., Bond, M.R., and Brooks, N. (1981). Disability after severe head injury: Observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurol Neurosurg. Psychiatry 44, 285-293
12. Rappaport, M., Hall, K.M., Hopkins, K., Belleza, T., and Cope, D.N. (1982). Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 63, 118-123
13. Hall, K., Cope, D.N., and Rappaport, M. (1985). Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale: Comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 66, 35-37
14. Fleming, J.M., and Maas, F. (1994). Prognosis of rehabilitation outcome in head injury using the Disability Rating Scale. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 156-163
15. Gouvier, W.D., Blanton, P.D., LaPorte, K.K., and Nepomuceno, C. (1987). Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 68, 94-97
16. Hall, K.M., Bushnik, T., Lakisic-Kazazic, B., Wright, J., and Cantagallo, A. (2001). Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 367-374
17. McCauley, S.R., Hannay, H.J., and Swank, P.R. (2001). Use of the Disability Rating Scale recovery curve as a predictor of psychosocial outcome following closed-head injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 7, 457-467
18. Vanier, M., Mazaux, J.M., Lambert, J., Dassa, C., and Levin, H.S. (2000). Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: Interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81, 796-806
19. Soury, S., Mazaux, J.M., Lambert, J., De Seze, M., Joseph, P.A., Lozes-Boudillon, S., McCauley, S., Vanier, M., and Levin, H.S. (2005). [The neurobehavioral rating scale-revised: Assessment of concurrent validity]. Ann. Readapt. Med. Phys. 48, 61-70
20. McCauley, S.R., Levin, H.S., Vanier, M., Mazaux, J.M., Boake, C., Goldfader, P.R., Rockers, D., Butters, M., Kareken, D.A., Lambert, J., and Clifton, G.L. (2001). The neurobehavioural rating scale-revised: Tensitivity and validity in closed head injury assessment. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 71, 643-651
21. Levin, H.S., High, W.M., Goethe, K.E., Sisson, R.A., Overall, J.E., Rhoades, H.M., Eisenberg, H.M., Kalisky, Z., and Gary, H.E. (1987). The neurobehavioural rating scale: Assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 50, 183-193
22. Marshall, L.F., Marshall, S.B., Klauber, M.R., Van Berkum, Clark M., Eisenberg, H., Jane, J.A., Luerssen, T.G., Marmarou, A., and Foulkes, M.A. (1992). The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J. Neurotrauma 9, Suppl. 1, S287-S292
23. Marshall, L.F., Marshall, S.B., Klauber, M.R., van Berkum Clark, M., Eisenberg, H.M., Jane, J.A., Luerssen, T.G., Marmarou, A., and Foulkes, M.A. (1991). A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J. Neurosurg. 75, S14
24. Bigler, E.D., Ryser, D.K., Gandhi, P., Kimball, J., and Wilde, E.A. (2006). Day-of-injury computerized tomography, rehabilitation status, and development of cerebral atrophy in persons with traumatic brain injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 793-806
25. Anastasi, A., and Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing. 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ
26. Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B. 57, 289-300