Relationships between feed efficiency, scrotal circumference, and semen quality traits in yearling bulls

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 90, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3937-3944

  Hafl, A N ^a   Lancaster, P A ^b   Carstens, G E ^a   Forrest, D W ^a   Fox, J T ^c   Forbes, T D A ^d   Davis, M E ^e   Randel, R D ^d   Holloway, J W ^d  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JBS Five Rivers Cattle Feeding LLC   (United States)

^d TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Residual feed intake; Scrotal circumference; Sperm morphology; Sperm motility

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CATTLE; DIET; ENERGY METABOLISM; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEXUAL MATURATION; SPERM;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DIET; ENERGY METABOLISM; MALE; SEMEN; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEXUAL MATURATION;

EID: 84882577339     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4029     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Washington, DC.
2. Archer, J. A., P. F. Arthur, R. M. Herd, P. F. Parnell, and W. S. Pithford. 1997. Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2024-2032.
3. Arthur, P. F., J. A. Archer, and R. M. Herd. 2004. Feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle: Overview of recent Australian research and challenges for the future. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44:361-369.
4. Arthur, P. F., J. A. Archer, D. J. Johnson, R. M. Herd, E. C. Richardson, and P. F. Parnell. 2001a. Generic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2805-2811.
5. Arthur, P. F., R. M. Herd, and J. A. Archer. 2003. Should measures of body composition be included in the model for residual feed intake in beef cattle? Proc. Assoc. Adv. Anim. Breed. Genet. 15:306-309.
6. Arthur, P. F., R. M. Herd, J. F. Wilkins, and J. A. Archer. 2005. Maternal productivity of Angus cows divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 45:985-993.
7. Arthur, P. F., G. Renand, and D. Krauss. 2001b. Genetic parameters for growth and feed efficiency in weaner versus yearling Charolais bulls. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52:471-476.
8. Arthur, P. F., G. Renand, and D. Krauss. 2001c. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among different measures of growth and feed efficiency in young Charolais bulls. Livest. Prod. Sci. 68:131-139.
9. Barber, K. A., and J. O. Almquist. 1975. Growth and feed efficiency and their relationship to pubertal traits of Charolais bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 40:288-301.
10. Barth, A. D., and C. L. Waldner. 2002. Factors affecting breeding soundness classification of beef bulls examined at the Western College of Veterinary Medicine. Can. Vet. J. 43:274-284.
11. Basarab, J. A., M. G. Colazo, D. J. Ambrose, S. Novak, D. McCartney, and V. S. Baron. 2011. Residual feed intake adjusted for backfat thickness and feeding frequency is independent of fertility in beef heifers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 91:573-584.
12. Basarab, J. A., D. McCartney, E. K. Okine, and V. S. Baron. 2007. Relationships between progeny residual feed intake and dam productivity traits. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 87:489-502.
13. Basarab, J. A., M. A. Price, J. L. Aalhus, E. K. Okine, W. M. Snelling, and K. L. Lyle. 2003. Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83:189-204.
14. Bourdon, R. M., and J. S. Brinks. 1986. Scrotal circumference in yearling Hereford bulls: Adjustment factors, heritabilities and genetic, environmental and phenotypic relationships with growth traits. J. Anim. Sci. 62:958-967.
15. Corbet, N. J., R. K. Shepherd, H. M. Burrow, J. Westhuized, P. E. Strydom, and D. J. Bosman. 2006. Evaluation of Bonsmara and Belomont Red cattle breeds in South Africa. 1. Productive performance. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 46:199-212.
16. Chenoweth, P. J., J. C. Spitzer, and F. M. Hopkins. 1992. A new bull breeding soundness evaluation form. Pages 63-71 in Proc. Ann. Mtng. Soc. for Theriogenology, San Antonio, TX.
17. Coulter, G. H., and D. R. C. Bailey. 1988. Epididymal sperm reserves in 12-month-old Angus and Hereford bulls: Effects of bull strain plus dietary energy. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 16:169-175.
18. Coulter, G. H., R. B. Cook, and J. P. Kastelic. 1997. Effects of dietary energy on scrotal surface temperature, and sperm production in young beef bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1048-1052.
19. Crews, D. H., Jr., G. E. Carstens, and P. A. Lancaster. 2006. Case study: A multiple trait selection index including feed efficiency. Prof. Anim. Sci. 22:65-70.
20. Crowley, J. J., R. D. Evans, N. Mc Hugh, D. A. Kenny, M. McGee, D. H. Crews Jr., and D. P. Berry. 2011. Genetic relationships between feed efficiency in growing males and beef cow performance. J. Anim. Sci. 89:3372-3381.
21. Fields, M. J., J. F. Hentges Jr., and K. W. Cornellisse. 1982. Aspects of the sexual development of Brahman versus Angus bulls in Florida. Theriogenology 18:17-31.
22. Gipson, T. A., D. W. Vogt, J. W. Massey, and M. R. Ellersieck. 1985. Associations of scrotal circumference with semen traits in young beef bulls. Theriogenology 24:217-225.
23. Hahn, J., R. H. Foote, and G. E. Seidel. 1969. Testicular growth and related sperm output in dairy bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 29:41-47.
24. Herd, R. M., J. A. Archer, and P. F. Arthur. 2003. Reducing the cost of beef production through genetic improvement in residual feed intake: Opportunity and challenges to application. J. Anim. Sci. 81(E. Suppl. 1):E9-E17.
25. Herd, R. M., and P. F. Arthur. 2009. Physiological basis for residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 87(E. Suppl.):E64-E71.
26. Herd, R. M., and S. C. Bishop. 2000. Genetic variation in residual feed intake and its association with other production traits in British Hereford cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 63:111-119.
27. Hoque, M. A., K. Hiramoto, and T. Oikawa. 2005. Genetic relationship of feed efficiency traits of bulls with growth and carcass traits of their progeny for Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle. Anim. Sci. J. 76:107-114.
28. Kelly, A. K., M. McGee, D. H. Crews Jr., A. G. Fahey, A. R. Wylie, and D. A. Kenny. 2010. Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 88:109-123.
29. Koch, R. M., L. A. Swiger, D. Chambers, and K. E. Gregory. 1963. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 22:486-494.
30. Lancaster, P. A., G. E. Carstens, D. H. Crews Jr., T. H. Welsh Jr., T. D. A. Forbes, D. W. Forrest, L. O. Tedeschi, R. D. Randel, and F. M. Rouquette. 2009a. Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 87:3887-3896.
31. Lancaster, P. A., G. E. Carstens, F. R. B. Ribeiro, L. O. Tedeschi, and D. H. Crews. 2009b. Characterization of feed efficiency traits and relationships with feeding behavior and ultrasound carcass traits in growing bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 87:1528-1539.
32. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, R. D. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenberger. 2006. SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd ed. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
33. Lunstra, D. D. 1982. Testicular development and onset of puberty in beef bulls. Page 26 in Beef Res. Prog. Rep. No. 1, ARS-NC-21. U.S. Meat Anim. Res. Cent., Clay Center, NE.
34. Lunstra, D. D., and S. E. Echternkamp. 1982. Puberty in beef bulls: Acrosome morphology and semen quality in bulls of different breeds. J. Anim. Sci. 55:638-648.
35. Marini, P. J., and B. L. Goodman. 1969. Semen characteristics as influenced by selection for divergent growth rate in chickens. Poult. Sci. 48:859-865.
36. Morisson, M., A. Bordas, J. M. Petit, C. Jayat-Vignoles, R. Julien, and F. Minvielle. 1997. Associated effects of divergent selection for residual feed consumption on reproduction, sperm characteristics, and mitochondria of spermatozoa. Poult. Sci. 76:425-431.
37. Mwansa, P. B., and M. Makarechian. 1991. The effect of postweaning level of dietary energy on sex drive and semen quality of young beef bulls. Theriogenology 35:1169-1178.
38. Nkrumah, J. D., J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, A. Ammoura, S. Guercio, C. Hansen, C. Li, B. Murdoch, and S. S. Moore. 2004. Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2451-2459.
39. Nkrumah, J. D., J. A. Basarab, Z. Wang, C. Li, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore. 2007. Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and different measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 85:2711-2720.
40. Schenkel, F. S., S. P. Miller, and J. W. Wilton. 2004. Genetic parameters and breed differences for feed efficiency, growth, and body composition traits of young beef bulls. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84:177-185.
41. Shaffer, K. S., P. Turk, W. R. Wagner, and E. E. D. Felton. 2011. Residual feed intake, body composition, and fertility in yearling beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 89:1028-1034.
42. Siegel, P. B. 1963. Selection for body weight at eight weeks of age: 2. Correlated responses of feathering, body weights and reproductive characteristics. Poult. Sci. 42:896-905.
43. St-Pierre, N. R. 2001. Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. J. Dairy Sci. 76:2701-2705.
44. Tatman, S. R., D. A. Neuendorff, T. W. Wilson, and R. D. Randel. 2004. Influence of season of birth on growth and reproductive development of Brahman bulls. Theriogenology 62:93-102.
45. Van der Westhuizen, R. R., J. Van der Westhuizen, and S. J. Schoeman. 2004. Genetic variance components for residual feed intake and feed conversion ratio and their correlations with other production traits in beef bulls. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 34:257-264.