Theory and research on gender are always precarious

Psychology of Men and Masculinity

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 114-116

  Addis, Michael E ^a   Schwab, Joseph R ^a  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical theory; Epistemology; Gender; Masculinity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882574695     PISSN: 15249220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030960     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Addis, M. E., Mansfield, A. K.,&Syzdek, M. R. (2010). Is "masculinity" a problem? Framing the effects of gendered social learning in men. Psychology of Men&Masculinity, 11, 77-90. doi:10.1037/a0018602
2. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of "sex." New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511524059
5. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.
6. Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13-74). London, England: Sage.
7. Hayes, S. C. (1993). Analytic goals and the varieties of scientific contextualism. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese,&T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 11-27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
8. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581-592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
9. Leary, D. E. (Ed.). (1990). Metaphors in the history of psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10. Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/ CBO9780511752179
12. Slife, B. D. (1995). Newtonian time and psychological explanation. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16, 45-62.
13. Vandello, J. A.,&Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men&Masculinity, 14, 101-113.