Validation and Error

Comprehensive Chemometrics

Volumn 3, Issue , 2009, Pages 91-120

  Olivieri, A C ^a   Faber, N M ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

^b Chemometry Consultancy   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Error propagation; Figures of merit; Method validation; Multivariate calibration; Multiway analysis; Uncertainty estimates

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882554716     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044452701-1.00073-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (187)

1. ISO/IEC 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, 2005.
2. ISO-GUM, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1995.
3. Eurachem/CITAC Guide, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 2000.
4. Danzer K., Currie L.A. Guidelines for Calibration in Analytical Chemistry. Part I. Fundamentals and Single Component Calibration (IUPAC Recommendations 1998). Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70:993-1014.
5. Currie L.A. Nomenclature in Evaluation of Analytical Methods Including Detection and Quantification Capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure Appl. Chem. 1995, 67:1699-1723.
6. Vessman J., Stefan R.I., van Staden J.F., Danzer K., Lindner W., Burns D.T., Fajgelj A., Müller H. Selectivity in Analytical Chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 2001). Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73:1381-1386.
7. Otto M., Wegscheider W. Selectivity in Multicomponent Analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 180:445-456.
8. Massart D.L., Vandeginste B.G.M., Deming S.N., Michotte Y., Kaufman L. Chemometrics: A Textbook 1988, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
9. Kalivas J.H. Assessing Spectral Orthogonality. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 1989-1990, 25:229-259.
10. Kalivas J.H., Lang P.M. Mathematical Analysis of Spectral Orthogonality 1994, Marcel Dekker, New York.
11. Booksh K.S., Kowalski B.R. Theory of Analytical Chemistry. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66:782A-791A.
12. Kalivas J.H., Lang P.M. Interrelationships Between Sensitivity and Selectivity Measures for Spectroscopic Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1996, 32:135-149.
13. Danzer K. Selectivity and Specificity in Analytical Chemistry. General Considerations and Attempt of a Definition and Quantification. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2001, 369:394-400.
14. Faber N.M., Ferré J., Boqué R., Kalivas J.H. Quantifying Selectivity in Spectrophotometric Multicomponent Analysis. Trends Analyt. Chem. 2003, 22:352-361.
15. Lorber A. Error Propagation and Figures of Merit for Quantification by Solving Matrix Equations. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58:1167-1172.
16. Lorber A., Harel A., Goldbart Z., Brenner I.B. Curve Resolution and Figures of Merit Estimation for Determination of Trace Elements in Geological Materials by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59:1260-1266.
17. Bergmann G., von Oepen B., Zinn P. Improvement in the Definitions of Sensitivity and Selectivity. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59:2522-2526.
18. Martens H., Næs T. Multivariate Calibration 1989, Wiley, Chichester.
19. Lorber A., Kowalski B.R. Estimation of Prediction Error for Multivariate Calibration. J. Chemom. 1988, 2:93-109.
20. Höskuldsson A. PLS Regression Methods. J. Chemom. 1988, 2:211-228.
21. Danzer K., Otto M., Currie L.A. Guidelines for Calibration in Analytical Chemistry. Part 2: Multicomponent Calibration (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76:1215-1225.
22. Olivieri A.C., Faber N.M., Ferré J., Boqué R., Kalivas J.H., Mark H. Uncertainty Estimation in Spectroscopic Multivariate Calibration. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006, 78:633-661.
23. ASTM D6122-99, Standard Practice for Validation of Multivariate Process Infrared Spectrophotometers; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
24. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03.06, E1655, Standard Practices for Infrared, Multivariate, Quantitative Analysis; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 1998.
25. Sanchez E., Kowalski B.R. Generalized Rank Annihilation Factor Analysis. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58:496-499.
26. Sanchez E., Kowalski B.R. Tensorial Calibration: I. First-Order Calibration. J. Chemom. 1988, 2:247-263.
27. Sanchez E., Kowalski B.R. Tensorial Resolution: A Direct Trilinear Decomposition. J. Chemom. 1990, 4:29-45.
28. Van der Linden W.E. Definition and Classification of Interferences in Analytical Procedures. Pure Appl. Chem. 1989, 61:91-95.
29. Frank I.E., Kalivas J.H., Kowalski B.R. Partial Least Squares Solutions for Multicomponent Analysis. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55:1800-1804.
30. Haaland D.M., Melgaard D.K. Partial Least Squares Solutions for Multicomponent Analysis. Appl. Spectrosc. 2001, 55:1-8.
31. Leurgans S., Ross R.T. Multilinear Models: Applications in Spectroscopy. Stat. Sci. 1992, 7:289-319.
32. Linder M., Sundberg R. Second-Order Calibration: Bilinear Least Squares Regression and a Simple Alternative. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 42:159-178.
33. Linder M., Sundberg R. Precision of Prediction in Second-Order Calibration, with Focus on Bilinear Regression Methods. J. Chemom. 2002, 16:12-27.
34. Hirschfeld T. The Hyphenated Methods. Anal. Chem. 1980, 52:297A-303A.
35. Kubista M. A New Method for the Analysis of Correlated Data Using Procrustes Rotation Which is Suitable for Spectral Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1990, 7:273-279.
36. Wilson I.D., Brinkman U.A.Th. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1000:325-356.
37. Bro R. PARAFAC. Tutorial and Applications. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38:149-171.
38. Warner I.M., Davidson E.R., Christian G.D. Quantitative Analyses of Multicomponent Fluorescence Data by the Methods of Least Squares and Non-Negative Least Sum of Errors. Anal. Chem. 1977, 49:2155-2159.
39. Wu H.L., Shibukawa M., Oguma K. An Alternating Trilinear Decomposition Algorithm with Application to Calibration of HPLC-DAD for Simultaneous Determination of Overlapped Chlorinated Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J. Chemom. 1998, 12:1-26.
40. Chen Z.P., Wu H.L., Jiang J.H., Li Y., Yu R.Q. A Novel Trilinear Decomposition Algorithm for Second-Order Linear Calibration. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 52:75-86.
41. DeJuan A., Casassas E., Tauler R. Soft Modelling of Analytical Data. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry 2002, Vol. 11:9800-9837. Wiley, Chichester. R.A. Myers (Ed.).
42. Kiers H.A.L., Smilde A.K. Some Theoretical Results on Second-Order Calibration Methods for Data With and Without Rank Overlap. J. Chemom. 1995, 9:179-195.
43. Wilson B.E., Lindberg W., Kowalski B.R. Multicomponent Quantitative Analysis Using Second-Order Nonbilinear Data: Theory and Simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111:3797-3804.
44. Wang Y., Borgen O., Kowalski B.R., Gu M., Turecek F. Advances in Second-Order Calibration. J. Chemom. 1993, 7:117-130.
45. Wold S., Geladi P., Esbensen K., Øhman J. Multiway Principal Components and PLS Analysis. J. Chemom. 1987, 1:41-56.
46. Bro R. Multiway Calibration. Multilinear PLS. J. Chemom. 1996, 10:47-61.
47. Faber N.M., Bro R. Standard Error of Prediction for Multiway PLS: 1. Background and a Simulation Study. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 61:133-149.
48. Bro, R.; Rinnan, Å.; Faber, N. M. Standard Error of Prediction for Multilinear PLS: 2. Practical Implementation in Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2004, in press.
49. Öhman J., Geladi P., Wold S. Residual Bilinearization. Part I. Theory and Algorithms. J. Chemom. 1990, 4:79-90.
50. Olivieri A.C. On a Versatile Second-Order Multivariate Calibration Method Based on Partial Least-Squares and Residual Bilinearization. Second-Order Advantage and Precision Properties. J. Chemom. 2005, 19:253-265.
51. Culzoni M.J., Goicoechea H.C., Pagani A.P., Cabezón M.A., Olivieri A.C. Evaluation of Partial Least-Squares with Second-Order Advantage for the Multi-Way Spectroscopic Analysis of Complex Biological Samples in the Presence of Analyte-Background Interactions. Analyst 2006, 131:718-732.
52. Olivieri A.C. A Combined Artificial Neural Network/Residual Bilinearization Approach for Obtaining the Second-Order Advantage from Three-Way Non-Linear Data. J. Chemom. 2005, 19:615-624.
53. Olivieri A.C., Arancibia J.A., Muñoz de la Peña A., Durán-Merás I., Espinosa Mansilla A. Second-Order Advantage Achieved with Four-Way Fluorescence Excitation-Emission-Kinetic Data Processed by Parallel Factor Analysis and Trilinear Least-Squares. Determination of Methotrexate and Leucovorin in Human Urine. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:5657-5666.
54. Arancibia J.A., Olivieri A.C., Bohoyo Gil D., Muñoz de la Peña A., Durán-Merás I., Espinosa Mansilla A. Trilinear Least-Squares and Unfolded-PLS Coupled to Residual Trilinearization: New Chemometric Tools for the Analysis of Four-Way Instrumental Data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006, 80:77-86.
55. Geladi P. Some Recent Trends in the Calibration Literature. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 60:211-224.
56. Magnus J.R., Neudecker H. Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics 1988, Wiley, Chichester.
57. Shao J., Tu D. The Jackknife and Bootstrap 1995, Springer, New York.
58. Faber N.M. The Price Paid for the Second-Order Advantage When Using the Generalized Rank Annihilation Method (GRAM). J. Chemom. 2001, 15:743-748.
59. Faber N.M., Ferré J., Boqué R., Kalivas J.H. Second-Order Bilinear Calibration: The Effects of Vectorizing the Data Matrices of the Calibration Set. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 63:107-116.
60. DiFoggio R. Guidelines for Applying Chemometrics to Spectra: Feasibility and Error Propagation. Appl. Spectrosc. 2000, 54:94A-113A.
61. Lorber A., Faber K., Kowalski B.R. Local Centering in Multivariate Calibration. J. Chemom. 1996, 10:215-220.
62. Lorber A., Kowalski B.R. The Effect of Interferences and Calibration Design on Accuracy: Implications for Sensor and Sample Selection. J. Chemom. 1988, 2:67-79.
63. Ortiz M.C., Sarabia L.A., Herrero A. Robust Regression Techniques: A Useful Alternative for the Detection of Outlier Data in Chemical Analysis. Talanta 2006, 70:499-512.
64. Ortiz M.C., Arcos J., Juarros J.V., López-Palacios J., Sarabia L.A. Robust Procedure for Calibration and Calculation of the Detection Limit of Trimipramine by Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetry at a Carbon Paste Electrode. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65:678-682.
65. Huffel S.V., Lemmerling P. Total Least Squares and Errors-in-Variables Modeling: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
66. Bocio F.J.R., Riu J., Boqué R., Rius F.X. Limits of Detection in Linear Regression with Errors in the Concentration. J. Chemom. 2003, 17:413-421.
67. Karstang T.V., Toft J., Kvalheim O.M. Estimation of Prediction Error for Samples Within the Calibration Range. J. Chemom. 1992, 6:177-188.
68. Phatak A., Reilly P.M., Penlidis A. An Approach to Interval Estimation in Partial Least Squares Regression. Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 277:495-501.
69. Phatak, A. Evaluation of Some Multivariate Methods and Their Applications in Chemical Engineering, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, 1993.
70. De Vries S., Ter Braak C.J.F. Prediction Error in Partial Least Squares Regression: A Critique on the Deviation Used in The Unscrambler. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 30:239-245.
71. Faber K., Kowalski B.R. Prediction Error in Least Squares Regression: Further Critique on the Deviation used in The Unscrambler. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1996, 34:283-292.
72. Berger A.J., Feld M.S. Analytical Method of Estimating Chemometric Prediction Error. Appl. Spectrosc. 1997, 51:725-732.
73. Denham M.C. Prediction Intervals in Partial Least Squares. J. Chemom. 1997, 11:39-52.
74. Faber K., Kowalski B.R. Propagation of Measurement Errors for the Validation of Predictions Obtained by Principal Component Regression and Partial Least Squares. J. Chemom. 1997, 11:181-238.
75. Faber N.M., Duewer D.L., Choquette S.J., Green T.L., Chesler S.N. Characterizing the Uncertainty in Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Prediction of Mixed-Oxygenate Concentrations in Gasoline: Sample-Specific Prediction Intervals. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70:2972-2982.
76. Høy M., Steen K., Martens H. Review of Partial Least Squares Regression Prediction Error in Unscrambler. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 44:123-133.
77. Morsing T., Ekman C. Comments on Construction of Confidence Intervals in Connection with Partial Least Squares. J. Chemom. 1998, 12:295-299.
78. Denham M.C. Choosing the Number of Factors in Partial Least Squares Regression: Estimating and Minimizing the Mean Squared Error of Prediction. J. Chemom. 2000, 14:351-361.
79. Faber N.M. Response to Comments on Construction of Confidence Intervals in Connection with Partial Least Squares. J. Chemom. 2000, 14:363-369.
80. Faber N.M. Comparison of Two Recently Proposed Expressions for Partial Least Squares Regression Prediction Error. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 52:123-134.
81. Song X.-H., Faber N.M., Hopke P.K., Suess D.T., Prather K.A., Schauer J.J., Cass G.R. Source Apportionment of Gasoline and Diesel by Multivariate Calibration Based on Single Particle Mass Spectral Data. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 446:329-343.
82. Olivieri A.C. A Simple Approach to Uncertainty Propagation in Preprocessed Multivariate Calibration. J. Chemom. 2002, 16:207-217.
83. Fernández Pierna J.A., Jin L., Wahl F., Faber N.M., Massart D.L. Estimation of Partial Least Squares Regression Prediction Uncertainty When the Reference Values Carry a Sizeable Measurement Error. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 65:281-291.
84. Faber N.M., Song X.-H., Hopke P.K. Sample-Specific Standard Error of Prediction for Partial Least Squares Regression. Trends Analyt. Chem. 2003, 22:330-334.
85. Serneels S., Lemberge P., Van Espen P.J. Calculation of PLS Prediction Intervals Using Efficient Recursive Relations for the Jacobian Matrix. J. Chemom. 2004, 18:76-80.
86. Kleinknecht R. Error Estimation in PLS Latent Variable Structure. J. Chemom. 1996, 10:687-695.
87. Stoica P., Söderström T. Partial Least Squares: A First-Order Analysis. Scand. J. Stat. 1998, 25:17-24.
88. Phatak A., Reilly P.M., Penlidis A. The Asymptotic Variance of the Univariate PLS Estimator. Linear Algebra Appl. 2002, 354:245-253.
89. Næs T., Martens H. Principal Component Regression in NIR Analysis: Viewpoints, Background Details and Selection of Components. J. Chemom. 1988, 2:155-167.
90. Egan W.J., Brewer W.E., Morgan S.L. Measurement of Carboxyhemoglobin in Forensic Blood Samples Using UV-Visible Spectrometry and Improved Principal Component Regression. Appl. Spectrosc. 1999, 53:218-225.
91. Chryssolouris G., Lee M., Ramsey A. Confidence Interval Prediction for Neural Networks Models. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1996, 7:229-232.
92. Baffi G., Martin E., Morris J. Prediction Intervals for Non-Linear Projection to Latent Structures Regression Models. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 61:151-165.
93. Bauer G., Wegscheider W., Ortner H.M. Selectivity and Error Estimates in Multivariate Calibration: Application to Sequential ICP-OES. Spectrochim. Acta 1991, 46B:1185-1196.
94. Faber N.M., Buydens L.M.C., Kateman G. Generalized Rank Annihilation Method. II: Bias and Variance in the Estimated Eigenvalues. J. Chemom. 1993, 7:495-526.
95. Jochem C., Jochem P., Kowalski B.R. Error Propagation and Optimal Performance in Multicomponent Analysis. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53:85-92.
96. Moran M.G., Kowalski B.R. Effect of Random Experimental Error on the Generalized Standard Addition Method. Anal. Chem. 1984, 56:562-569.
97. Cabezón M., Olivieri A.C. Precision in Two-Wavelength Spectroscopic Analysis of Binary Mixtures. Chem. Educator 2004, 9:288-296.
98. Cabezón M., Olivieri A.C. Precision in Multi-Wavelength Spectroscopic Analysis Using Classical Least-Squares Regression. Chem. Educator 2006, 11:394-401.
99. Ho C.-N., Christian G.D., Davidson E.R. Application of the Method of Rank Annihilation to Fluorescent Multi-Component Mixtures of Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Anal. Chem. 1980, 52:1071-1079.
100. Appellof C.J., Davidson E.R. Three-Dimensional Rank Annihilation for Multi-Component Determinations. Anal. Chim. Acta 1983, 146:9-14.
101. Malinowski E.R. Factor Analysis in Chemistry 2002, Wiley, New York. 3rd ed.
102. Sanchez, E. Tensorial Calibration: The Generalized Rank Annihilation Method. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 1987.
103. Booksh K., Kowalski B.R. Error Analysis of the Generalized Rank Annihilation Method. J. Chemom. 1994, 8:45-63.
104. Faber N.M., Buydens L.M.C., Kateman G. Generalized Rank Annihilation Method. II: Bias and Variance in the Estimated Eigenvalues. J. Chemom. 1994, 8:181-203.
105. Faber K., Lorber A., Kowalski B.R. Analytical Figures of Merit for Tensorial Calibration. J. Chemom. 1997, 11:95-109.
106. Faber N.M., Ferré J., Boqué R. Iteratively Reweighted Generalized Rank Annihilation Method. 1. Improved Handling of Prediction Bias. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 55:67-90.
107. Faber N.M., Boqué R., Ferré J. Iteratively Reweighted Generalized Rank Annihilation Method: 2. Least Squares Property and Variance Expressions. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 55:91-100.
108. Serneels S., Moens M., Van Espen P.J., Blockhuys F. Identification of Micro-Organisms by Dint of the Electronic Nose and Trilinear Partial Least Squares Regression. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 516:1-5.
109. Appellof C.J., Davidson E.R. Strategies for Analyzing Data from Video Fluorometric Monitoring of Liquid Chromatographic Effluents. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53:2053-2056.
110. Olivieri A.C., Faber N.M. Standard Error of Prediction in Parallel Factor (PARAFAC) Analysis of Three-Way Data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2004, 70:75-82.
111. Paatero P. A Weighted Non-Negative Least Squares Algorithm for Three-Way 'PARAFAC' Factor Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38:223-242.
112. Liu X., Sidiropoulos N. Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds for Low-Rank Decomposition of Multidimensional Arrays. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2001, 49:2074-2086.
113. Olivieri A.C. Sample-Specific Standard Prediction Errors in Three-Way Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) Exploiting the Second-Order Advantage. J. Chemom. 2004, 18:363-371.
114. Haimovich A., Orselli R., Escandar G.M., Olivieri A.C. Sensitivity and Prediction Error for Spectroscopic Bilinear Least-Squares Exploiting the Second-Order Advantage. Theoretical and Experimental Study. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006, 80:99-108.
115. Olivieri A.C. Computing Sensitivity and Selectivity in Parallel Factor Analysis and Related Multi-Way Techniques: The Need for Further Developments in Net Analyte Signal Theory. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:4936-4946.
116. del Río F.J., Riu J., Rius F.X. Graphical Criterion for the Detection of Outliers in Linear Regression Taking into Account Errors in Both Axes. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 446:49-58.
117. Martínez A., Riu J., Rius F.X. Multiple Analytical Method Comparison Using Maximum Livelihood Principal Component Analysis and Linear Regression with Errors in Both Axes. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 446:145-156.
118. Martínez A., Riu J., Rius F.X. Lack of Fit in Linear Regression Considering Errors in Both Axes. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 54:61-73.
119. Martínez A., del Río F.J., Riu J., Rius F.X. Detecting Proportional and Constant Bias in Method Comparison Studies by Using Linear Regression with Errors in Both Axes. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999, 49:179-193.
120. Riu J., Rius F.X. Detecting Proportional and Constant Bias in Method Comparison Studies by Using Linear Regression with Errors in Both Axes. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68:1851-1857.
121. Satterthwaite F.E. Synthesis of Variance. Psychometrika 1941, 6:309-316.
122. Morgan D.R. Spectral Absorption Pattern Detection and Estimation. I. Analytical Techniques. Appl. Spectrosc. 1977, 31:404-415.
123. Faber K., Lorber A., Kowalski B.R. Analytical Figures of Merit for Tensorial Calibration. J. Chemom. 1997, 11:419-461.
124. Faber N.M. Mean Centering and Computation of Scalar Net Analyte Signal in Multivariate Calibration. J. Chemom. 1998, 12:405-409.
125. Ferré J., Brown S.D., Rius F.X. Improved Calculation of the Net Analyte Signal in Inverse Multivariate Calibration. J. Chemom. 2001, 15:537-553.
126. Ferré J., Faber N.M. Net Analyte Signal Calculation for Multivariate Calibration. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 69:123-136.
127. Bro R., Andersen C.M. Theory of Net Analyte Signal Vectors in Inverse Regression. J. Chemom. 2004, 17:646-652.
128. Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature IUPAC, web edition. http://old.iupac.org/publications/analytical_compendium/.
129. International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM) 1993, BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, ISO, Geneva. 2nd ed.
130. Messick N.J., Kalivas J.H., Lang P.M. Selectivity and Related Measures for Nth-Order Data. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68:1572-1579.
131. Olivieri A.C., Faber N.M. A Closed-Form Expression for Computing the Sensitivity in Second-Order Bilinear Calibration. J. Chemom. 2005, 19:583-592.
132. van der Voet H. Detection Limits. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics 2002, Vol. 1:504-515. Wiley, Chichester. A.H. El-Shaarawi, W.W. Piegorsch (Eds.).
133. Mandel J., Stiehler R.D. Sensitivity - A Criterion for the Comparison of Methods of Test. J. Res. Natl Bur. Stand. 1954, 53:155-159.
134. Cuadros Rodríguez L., García Campaña A.M., Jiménez Linares C., Román Ceba M. Estimation of Performance Characteristics of an Analytical Method Using the Data Set of the Calibration Experiment. Anal. Lett. 1993, 26:1243-1258.
135. Goicoechea H.C., Olivieri A.C. Enhanced Synchronous Spectrofluorometric Determination of Tetracycline in Blood Serum by Chemometric Analysis. Comparison of Partial Least-Squares and Hybrid Linear Analysis Calibrations. Anal. Chem. 1999, 19:4361-4368.
136. Belén Sanz M., Sarabia L.A., Herrero A., Cruz Ortiz M. Multivariate Analytical Sensitivity in the Determination of Selenium, Copper, Lead and Cadmium by Stripping Voltammetry When Using Soft Calibration. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 489:85-94.
137. Braga J.W.B., Poppi R.J. Figures of Merit for the Determination of the Polymorphic Purity of Carbamazepine by Infrared Spectroscopy and Multivariate Calibration. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 93:2124-2134.
138. Muñoz de la Peña A., Espinosa Mansilla A., González Gómez D., Olivieri A.C., Goicoechea H.C. Interference-Free Analysis Using Three-Way Fluorescence Data and the Parallel Factor Model. Determination of Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics in Human Serum. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:2640-2646.
139. Thompson M., Ellison S.L.R., Wood R. Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74:835-855.
140. Umezawa Y., Bühlmann P., Umezawa K., Tohda K., Amemiya S. Potentiometric Selectivity Coefficients of Ion-Selective Electrodes. Part I. Inorganic Cations (Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72:1851-2082.
141. Umezawa Y., Umezawa K., Bühlmann P., Hamada N., Aoki H., Nakanishi J., Sato M., Xiao K.P., Nishimura Y. Potentiometric Selectivity Coefficients of Ion-Selective Electrodes. Part II. Inorganic Anions (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74:923-994.
142. Umezawa Y., Bühlmann P., Umezawa K., Hamada N. Potentiometric Coefficients of Ion-Selective Electrodes. Part III. Organic ions (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74:995-1099.
143. Lorber A., Faber K., Kowalski B.R. Net Analyte Signal Calculation in Multivariate Calibration. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69:1620-1626.
144. Kalivas J.H. Variance-Decomposition of Pure-Component Spectra as a Measure of Selectivity. J. Chemom. 1989, 3:409-418.
145. Arnold M.A., Small G.W., Xiang D., Qui J., Murhammer D.W. Pure Component Selectivity Analysis of Multivariate Calibration Models from Near-Infrared Spectra. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:2583-2590.
146. Brown C.D., Ridder T.D. Framework for Multivariate Selectivity Analysis, Part I: Theoretical and Practical Merits. Appl. Spectrosc. 2005, 59:787-803.
147. Ridder T.D., Brown C.D., Ver Steeg V.J. Framework for Multivariate Selectivity Analysis, Part II: Experimental Applications. Appl. Spectrosc. 2005, 59:804-815.
148. Boqué R., Rius F.X. Computing Detection Limits in Multicomponent Spectroscopic Analysis. Trends Analyt. Chem. 1997, 16:432-436.
149. García I., Sarabia L., Ortiz M.C., Aldama J.M. Usefulness of D-optimal Designs and Multicriteria Optimization in Laborious Analytical Procedures. Application to the Extraction of Quinolones From Eggs. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1085:190-198.
150. Sarabia L., Ortiz M.C. DETARCHI: A Program for Detection Limits with Specified Assurance Probabilities and Characteristic Curves of Detection. Trends Analyt. Chem. 1994, 13:1-6.
151. Wilrich, P., Chairman, ISO 11843 series of standards about Capability of Detection; Part 1: Terms and Definitions (1997) + Cor 1 (2003, IDT); Part 2: Methodology in the Linear Calibration Case (2000, IDT); Part 3: Methodology for Determination of the Critical Value for the Response Variable when no Calibration Data are Used (2003, IDT); Part 4: Methodology for Comparing the Minimum Detectable Value with a Given Value (2003, IDT); Part 5: Methodology in the Linear and Non-Linear Calibration Cases (2005, AWI ISO TC 69/SC6).
152. Currie L.A. Detection: International Update, and Some Emerging Di-Lemmas Involving Calibration, the Blank, and Multiple Detection Decisions. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 37:151-181.
153. Boqué R., Rius F.X. Multivariate Detection Limits Estimators. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1996, 32:11-23.
154. Bauer G., Wegscheider W., Ortner H.M. Selectivity and Limits of Detection in Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry Using Multivariate Calibration. Spectrochim. Acta 1992, 47B:179-188.
155. Faber K., Kowalski B.R. Improved Estimation of the Limit of Detection in Multivariate Calibration. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 357:789-795.
156. Boqué R., Faber N.M., Rius F.X. Detection Limits in Classical Multivariate Calibration Models. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 423:41-49.
157. Boqué R., Larrechi M.S., Rius F.X. Multivariate Detection Limits with Fixed Probabilities of Error. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999, 45:397-408.
158. Ortiz M.C., Sarabia L.A., Herrero A., Sánchez M.S., Sanz M.B., Rueda M.E., Giménez D., Meléndez M.E. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 69:21-33.
159. Delaney M.F. Multivariate Detection Limits for Selected Ion Monitoring Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1988, 3:45-51.
160. Singh A. Multivariate Decision and Detection Limits. Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 277:205-241.
161. Leal C., Granados M., Beltrán J.L., Campañó R., Prat M.-D. Application of Partial Least Squares Multivariate Calibration to Triphenyltin Determination in Sea-Water with Excitation-Emission Matrix Fluorescence. Analyst 1997, 122:1293-1298.
162. van der Voet H., de Boer W.J., de Ruig W.G., van Rhijn J.A. Detection of Residues Using Multivariate Modelling of Low-Level GC-MS Measurements. J. Chemom. 1998, 12:279-294.
163. Saurina J., Leal C., Campañó R., Granados M., Prat M.-D., Tauler R. Determination of Triphenyltin in Sea-Water by Excitation-Emission Matrix Fluorescence and Multivariate Curve Resolution. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 432:241-251.
164. Fernández F.M., Tudino M.B., Troccoli O.E. Multicomponent Kinetic Determination of Cu, Zn, Co, Ni and Fe at Trace Levels by First and Second Order Multivariate Calibration. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 433:119-134.
165. Herrero A., Zamponi S., Marassi R., Conyi P., Ortiz M.C., Sarabia L.A. Determination of the Capability of Detection of a Hyphenated Method: Application to Spectroelectrochemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 61:63-74.
166. Boqué R., Ferré J., Faber N.M., Rius F.X. Limit of Detection Estimator for Second-Order Bilinear Calibration. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 451:313-321.
167. Ortiz M.C., Sarabia L.A., García I., Giménez D., Meléndez E. Capability of Detection and Three-Way Data. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 559:124-136.
168. Giménez D., Grasso D., Sarabia L., Ortiz M.C. Determination of Quinolones by Fluorescent Excitation Emission. Talanta 2004, 64:442-451.
169. García I., Sarabia L., Ortiz M.C., Aldama J.M. Three-Way Models and Detection Capability of a Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Method for the Determination of Clenbuterol in Several Biological Matrices: The 2002/657/EC European Decision. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 515:55-63.
170. Ferrús R., Egea M.R. Limit of Discrimination, Limit of Detection and Sensitivity in Analytical Systems. Anal. Chim. Acta 1994, 287:119-145.
171. Sanz M.B., Sarabia L.A., Herrero A., Ortiz M.C. Capability of Discrimination: Application to Soft Calibration Methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 446:297-311.
172. Currie L.A. Detection and Quantification Limits: Origins and Historical overview. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 391:127-134.
173. ISO 11843.1, Capability of Detection. Terms and Definitions, 2004.
174. Taylor J.K., Oppermann H.V. Handbook for the Quality Assurance of Metrological Measurements 1988, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea.
175. ISO 3534-1, Probability and Principles of Statistics. Terms and Definitions, 1993.
176. González A.G., Herrador M.A., Asuero A.G. Intra-Laboratory Testing of Method Accuracy from Recovery Assays. Talanta 1999, 48:729-736.
177. Miller J.N., Miller J.C. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry 2005, Pearson/Prentice Hall, New York, Chapter 2.
178. Mandel J., Linnig F.J. Study of Accuracy in Chemical Analysis Using Linear Calibration Curves. Anal. Chem. 1957, 29:743-749.
179. Riu J., Rius F.X. Method Comparison Using Regression with Uncertainties in Both Axes. Trends Analyt. Chem. 1997, 16:211-216.
180. Lisý J.M., Cholvadová A., Kutej J. Multiple Straight-Line Least-Squares Analysis with Uncertainties in All Variables. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 14:189-192.
181. Franco V., Mantovani V.E., Goicoechea H.C., Olivieri A.C. Teaching Chemometrics with a Bioprocess: Analytical Methods Comparison Using Bivariate Linear Regression. Chem. Educator 2002, 7:265-269.
182. Martínez A., Riu J., Busto O., Guasch J., Rius F.X. Validation of Bias in Multianalyte Determination Methods.: Application to RP-HPLC Derivatizing Methodologies. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 406:257-278.
183. Galea-Rojas M., de Castilho M.V., Bolfarine H., de Castro M. Local Influence in Regression Models for the Detection of Analytical Bias. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006, 83:139-147.
184. Galea-Rojas M., de Castilho M.V., Bolfarine H., de Castro M. Detection of Analytical Bias When Comparing Two or More Measuring Methods. J. Chemom. 2004, 18:431-440.
185. Galea-Rojas M., de Castilho M.V., Bolfarine H., de Castro M. Detection of Analytical Bias. Analyst 2003, 128:1073-1081.
186. Ripley B.D., Thompson M. Regression Techniques for the Detection of Analytical Bias. Analyst 1987, 112:377-383.
187. Massart D.L., Vandeginste B.G.M., Buydens L.M.C., De Jong S., Lewi P.J., Smeyers-Verbeke J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics 1997, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Chapter 13.