Monocular and Binocular Subjective Refraction

Borish's Clinical Refraction

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 790-898

  Barish, Irvin M ^a   Benjamin, William J ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882520500     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7524-6.50025-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (220)

1. Chen B, Makous W, Williams DR Serial spatial filters in vision. Vis Res 1993, 33:413-427.
2. Williams DR, Brainard DH, McMahon MJ, Navarro R Double-pass and interferometric measures of the optical quality of the eye. J Opt Soc Am 1994, 11:3123-3135.
3. Polasky M Monocular subjective refraction. Clinical Procedures in Optometry 1991, 174-188. JB Lippincott., Philadelphia. J.B. Eskridge, J.B. Amos, J.D. Bartlett (Eds.).
4. Michaels DM Subjective methods of refraction. Visual Optics and Refraction 1985, 316-334. CV Mosby., St. Louis. 3rd ed. D.M. Michaels (Ed.).
5. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB Subjective refraction. Clinical Visual Optics, Ch 6 1984, 95-117. Butterworths, London. A.G. Bennett, R.B. Rabbetts (Eds.).
6. Borish IM Subjective testing. Chapter 17. Clinical Refraction 1970, 715-803. Professional Press., Chicago. 3rd ed. I.M. Borish (Ed.).
7. Reese EE, Fry GA The effect of fogging lenses on accommodation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1941, 18:9-16.
8. Ward PA, Charman WN An objective assessment of the effect of fogging on accommodation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987, 64:762-767.
9. Ward PA The utility of fogging for relaxing accommodation. Optician 1987, 194:19-26.
10. Flom MC Variations in convergence and accommodation induced by successive spherical lens additions with distance fixation-An investigation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1955, 32:111-136.
11. Jones R Physiological pseudomyopia. Optom Vis Sci 1990, 67:614-616.
12. Smith G Relation between spherical refraction error and visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1991, 68:591-598.
13. Eastman AA, Guth SK A new astigmatic test chart. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1958, 35:461-469.
14. Sheard C A dozen worthwhile points in ocular refraction. Am J Physiol Opt 1923, 4:443.
15. Adams RL, Kadet TC, White DM Comparative study of four-ball cylinder test, Jackson cross cylinder test, and near cylinder test. J Am Optom Assoc 1966, 37:547-549.
16. Fannin TE, Grosvenor T Characteristics of ophthalmic lenses. Clinical Optics 1987, 25-59. Butterworth., Stoneham, MA. T.E. Fannin, T. Grosvenor (Eds.).
17. Linksz A Determination of axis and amount of astigmatic error by rotation of trial cylinder. Arch Ophthalmol 1942, 28:632-651.
18. Pascal JI Cross cylinder tests-Meridional balance technique. Opt J Rev Optom 1950, 87(18):31-33. 35.
19. Wunsch SE The cross cylinder. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1971, 11:131-153.
20. Brookman KE The Jackson cross-cylinder: Historical perspective. J Am Optom Assoc 1993, 64:329-331.
21. Crisp WH Photographing cross cylinder tests. Am J Ophthalmol 1943, 26:758-760.
22. Perlstein SH Mounted cross-cylinder: A new mounted Jackson cross-cylinder. Ann Ophthalmol 1982, 14:992.
23. Del Priore LV, Guyton DL The Jackson cross cylinder, a reappraisal. Ophthalmology 1986, 93:1461-1465.
24. Sims CN, Durham DG The Jackson cross-cylinder disproved. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1986, 84:355-386.
25. Haynes PR A homokonic cross cylinder for refractive procedures. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1957, 34:478-485.
26. Haynes PR Configuration and orientation of test patterns used with the homokonic cross cylinder for measurement of astigmatism. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1958, 35:637-643.
27. Guyton DL The American Optical SR-IV programmed subjective refractor: Principles of design and operation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982, 59:800-814.
28. Carter JH Sensitivity variations in the Jackson crossed cylinder axis test. Optom Weekly 1966, 57(28):29-32.
29. O'Leary DJ, Yang PH, Yeo CH Effect of cross-cylinder power on cylinder axis sensitivity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987, 64:367-369.
30. Williamson-Noble FA A possible fallacy in the use of the cross cylinder. Br J Ophthalmol 1943, 27:1-12.
31. Freeman H, Purdum G An analysis of the crossed-cylinder. Optician 1950, 120:375-380.
32. Warman JR The correction of low astigmatism. Optician 1950, 119:429-432.
33. Freeman H Bichromatic methods and near vision refraction. Opt J Rev Optom 1954, 91(16):27-32.
34. Harwood LW Small targets in cross-cylinder astigmatic testing. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1971, 48:153-155.
35. Bannon RE Recent developments in techniques for measuring astigmatism. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1958, 35:352-359.
36. Pascal JI The V test for astigmatism. Opt J Rev Optom 1952, 89(4):35-36.
37. Pascal JI Scope and significance of the accommodative unit. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1952, 29:113-128.
38. Borish IM Subjective testing of refraction. Volume 1: Optics & Refraction. Textbook of Ophthalmology 1991, 1-32. Gower Medical Publishing., New York. D. Miller, M. Podos, M. Yanoff (Eds.).
39. Campbell CE A new subjective test for astigmatic error. Optom Monthly 1978, 69:639-643.
40. Matsuura TT The Matsuura auto cross. Optom Weekly 1961, 52:2153-2156.
41. Biessels WJ The cross-cylinder Simultans test. J Am Optom Assoc 1967, 38:473-476.
42. Brooks CW A systematic method of trial frame subjective refraction. Optom Monthly 1982, 73:433-438.
43. LeVine ML Monocular simultaneous refraction. J Am Optom Assoc 1990, 61:745-748.
44. Goar EL Hints on refraction. Texas Med 1968, 64(8):30-31.
45. Egan JA A resumé of cross cylinder application and theory. Surv Ophthalmol 1956, 1:513-529.
46. Ong J, Shanks F, McConnell W Validity of four current tests of astigmatism. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1974, 51:587-594.
47. Smart FP Some observations on crossed cylinders. Arch Ophthalmol 1940, 24:999-1000.
48. Freeman H Working method-Subjective refraction. Br J Physiol Opt 1955, 12:20-30.
49. Davies PHO A critical analysis of bichromatic tests used in clinical refraction. Br J Physiol Opt 1957, 14:170-182. 213.
50. Mandell RB, Allen MJ The causes of bichromatic test failure. J Am Optom Assoc 1960, 31:531-533.
51. Borish IM Subjective testing. Indiana Optometrist 1946, 18(6):5-8.
52. Hofstetter HW The correction of astigmatism for near work. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1945, 22:121-134.
53. Layton A, Dickinson J, Pluznick M Perception of blur in optometric tests. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1978, 55:75-77.
54. Allen MJ Considerations of criteria of blur with respect to their use in the routine eye examination. The O-Eye-O 1950, 16(3):10-16.
55. Fisher EJ The trial case and optometry. Optom Weekly 1966, 57(28):33-36.
56. Giles GH The subjective refractive examination. The Principles and Practice of Refraction and Allied Subjects 1965, 143-156. Hammond., London. 2nd ed. G.H. Giles (Ed.).
57. Goodwin HE Optometric determination of balanced binocular refraction corrections. Optom Weekly 1966, 57(28):47-53.
58. Bannon RE, Triller W Aniseikonia-A clinical report covering a ten year period. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1944, 21:171-182.
59. Ellerbrock VJ The effect of aniseikonia on the amplitude of vertical divergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1952, 29:403-415.
60. Ogle KN Part II, The optical space sense. The Eye 1962, IV:211-417. Academic Press, New York. H. Davson (Ed.).
61. Stoddard K, Morgan MW Monocular accommodation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1942, 19:460-465.
62. Campbell FW Correlation of accommodation between the two eyes. J Opt Soc Am 1960, 50:738.
63. Spencer RW, Wilson WK Accommodative response in asymmetric convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1954, 31:498-505.
64. West D, Somers WW Binocular balance validity: A comparison of five different subjective techniques. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1984, 4:155-159.
65. Gentsch LW, Goodwin HE A comparison of methods for the determination of binocular refractive balance. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1966, 43:658-663.
66. Campbell FW, Westheimer G Factors influencing accommodation responses of the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 1959, 49:568-571.
67. Campbell FW Accommodation reflex. Br Orthopt J 1954, 11:13-17.
68. Flom MC, Goodwin HC Fogging lenses: Differential acuity response in the two eyes. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1964, 41:388-392.
69. Fern KD Visual acuity outcome in isometric hyperopia. Optom Vis Sci 1989, 66:649-658.
70. Townshend AM, Holmes JM, Evans LS Depth of anisometropic amblyopia and difference in refraction. Am J Ophthalmol 1993, 116:431-436.
71. Flom MC, Weymouth FW, Kahnemann D Visual resolution and contour interaction. J Opt Soc Am 1963, 53:1026-1032.
72. Bannon RE Binocular refraction-A survey of various techniques. Optom Weekly 1965, 56(31):25-31.
73. Horowitz MW An analysis of the superiority of binocular over monocular visual acuity. J Exp Psychol 1949, 39:581-597.
74. Grolman BE Binocular refraction-A new system. N Engl J Optom 1966, 17:118-130.
75. Amos JE Binocular refraction: When is it clinically advantageous?. Clin Eye Vis Care 1990, 2:79-81.
76. Smith D The estimation of the total refractive error without a cycloplegic. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otol 1930, 35:101-127.
77. Sugar HS Binocular refraction with cross cylinder technic. Arch Ophthalmol 1944, 31:34-42.
78. Humphriss D The refraction of binocular vision. Ophthalmic Opt 1963, 3:987-990. 997-1001.
79. Humphriss D Binocular vision technique-The psychological septum. Opt J Rev Optom 1962, 99:19-21.
80. Humphriss D The psychological sepum. An investigation into its function. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982, 59:639-641.
81. Mark HH On accuracy of accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol 1962, 46:742-744.
82. Mallett RFJ The investigation of oculomotor imbalance. Ophthalmic Opt 1966, 6:586. 654.
83. Turville AE Outline of Infinity Balance 1946, Raphael's Ltd., Hatton Garden., London.
84. Morgan MW The Turville Infinity binocular balance test. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1949, 26:231-239.
85. Morgan MW The Turville infinity binocular balance test. J Am Optom Assoc 1960, 31:447-450.
86. Freeman H The Freeman near-vision unit. Optician 1953, 126:453-457.
87. Fernandez RHP, Edmunds OP, Hunt TA Binocular diaphragm. Br J Physiol Opt 1955, 39:343-348.
88. Banks RF A fovea lock for infinity balance. Br J Physiol Opt 1954, 11:216-225.
89. Cowen L Binocular refraction, a simplified clinical routine. Br J Physiol Opt 1955, 16:60-82.
90. Van Wien S The Leland refractor, a method for refraction under binocular conditions. Arch Ophthalmol 1940, 23:104-111.
91. Norman SL Binocular subjective refraction with the Polaroid occluder. Optom Weekly 1950, 41:1657-1660.
92. Wilmut EB Infinity balance and near balance by polarization. Optician 1951, 122(3148):37-43.
93. Dowdeswell JL Binocular comparison with polarised charts. Optician 1952, 124(3205):167-170.
94. Freeman H, Hodd FAB Comparative analysis of retinoscopic and subjective refraction. Br J Physiol Opt 1955, 12:8-36.
95. Osterberg H Binocular refraction and measurement of phorias for distance and near vision. Optica Int 1964, 1(1):20-36.
96. Freeman H Bichromatic technique for distance and near refraction. Optician 1956, 132:497-503.
97. Baldwin WR Binocular testing and distance correction with the Berlin Polatest. J Am Optom Assoc 1962, 34:115-125.
98. Haase HJ Complete determination of eyeglasses with the Polatest. Werkzeitschrift 1961, 39:8-10. [translation of].
99. Frantz DA Natural color stereoscopic refraction. J Am Optom Assoc 1956, 30:471-476.
100. Phillips RC Stereo refraction. Pennsylvania Optometrist 1964, 24(4):9-11.
101. Eskridge JB A binocular refraction procedure. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1973, 50:499-505.
102. Eskridge JB Rationale for binocular refraction. N Engl J Optom 1971, 22:160-166.
103. Norman SL Plus acceptance in binocular refraction. Optom Weekly 1953, 44:45-46.
104. Brungardt TF Use of Turville subjective technique in a case of anisometropia and pseudo-amblyopia. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1958, 35:37-38.
105. Flom MC, Weymouth FW Centricity of Maxwell's spot in strabismus and amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 1961, 66:260-268.
106. Copeland JC Locating the astigmatic axes under binocular fixation. Ten Years of Optical Developments 1942, Riggs Optical Company., Chicago.
107. Amos JF, Rutstein RP Vertical Deviations. Chapter 17. Diagnosis and Management in Vision Care 1987, 515-583. Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham, MA. J.F. Amos (Ed.).
108. Scobee RG, Bennett EA Hyperphoria, a statistical study. Arch Ophthalmol 1950, 43:458-465.
109. Miles PW Binocular refraction. Am J Ophthalmol 1948, 31:1460-1466.
110. Rutstein RP, Eskridge JB Effect of cyclodeviations on the axis of astigmatism. Optom Vis Sci 1990, 67:80-83.
111. Grolman BE Binocular refraction-Fixation disparity. Optician 1971, 162(4195):16-19.
112. Elvin FT The results of prescribing prism from the Turville test. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1954, 31:308-314.
113. Eskridge JB Flip-prism test for vertical phoria. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1961, 38:415-419.
114. Borish IM Comments about subjective refraction and the importance of reliable communication. J Am Optom Assoc 1960, 31:457-462.
115. Presberg MH Psychologic factors in refraction. Am J Ophthalmol 1955, 39:567-569.
116. Amos JF Binocular refraction. Clinical Procedures in Optometry, Ch 19 1991, 189-193. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia. J.B. Eskridge, J.F. Amos, J.D. Bartlett (Eds.).
117. Amos JF Near subjective refraction. Clinical Procedures in Optometry, Ch 20 1991, 194-197. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia. J.B. Eskridge, J.F. Amos, J.D. Bartlett (Eds.).
118. Borish IM Comments on a "delayed" subjective test. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1945, 22:433-436.
119. Baxter NM A suggested "dynamic" subjective test. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1946, 23:80-82.
120. French CN, Jennings JAM Errors in subjective refraction-An exploratory study. Ophthalmol Opt 1974, 14:797-806.
121. Rosenfield M, Chiu NN Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1995, 72:577-579.
122. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Adams AJ The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992, 33:2325-2333.
123. Salmon TO, Horner DG A new subjective refraction method-The meridional polarized vernier optometer. J Am Optom Assoc 1996, 67:599-605.
124. Blackhurst DW, McGuire MG Reproducibility of refraction and visual acuity measurement under a standard protocol. Retina 1989, 9:163-169. The Maculo Photo Coagulation Group.
125. Jennings JAM, Charman WN A comparison of errors in some methods of subjective refraction. Ophthalmol Optician 1973, 13:8-11. 18.
126. Perrigin J, Perrigin DM, Grosvenor T A comparison of clinical refractive data obtained by three examiners. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982, 59:515-519.
127. Safir A, Hymons L, Philpot J, Jagerman LS Studies in refraction. I. The precision of retinoscopy. Arch Ophthalmol 1970, 84:49-61.
128. Johnson BL, Edwards JS, Goss DA, et al. A comparison of three subjective tests for astigmatism and their interexaminer reliabilities. J Am Optom Assoc 1996, 67:590-597.
129. Goss DA, Grosvenor T Reliability of refraction-A literature review. J Am Optom Assoc 1996, 67:619-630.
130. Giles GH Alternative subjective methods. The Principles and Practice of Refraction and Allied Subjects 1965, 165-196. Hammond., London. 2nd ed. G.H. Giles (Ed.).
131. Turville AE Modern developments in subjective refraction techniques. Optics 1950, 90:1-10.
132. Lebensohn JE A simplified astigmometer. Am J Ophthalmol 1949, 32:1128-1130.
133. Goodlaw E A new test for binocular refraction at the near-point working distance. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1961, 38:420-432.
134. Sloan LL New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at far and near distances. Am J Ophthalmol 1959, 48(6):807-813.
135. Bailey IL, Lovie JE New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1976, 53:740-745.
136. Fletcher RJ Astigmatic accommodation, Parts I and II. Br J Physiol Opt 1951, 8:73-94.
137. Fletcher RJ Astigmatic accommodation, Part III. Br J Physiol Opt 1951, 8:129-160.
138. Fletcher RJ Astigmatic accommodation, Part IV. Br J Physiol Opt 1951, 8:193-214.
139. Fletcher RJ Astigmatic accommodation, Part V. Br J Physiol Opt 1952, 9:8-32.
140. Bannon RE, Walsh R On astigmatism. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1945, 22:210-219.
141. Bannon RE A study of astigmatism at the near point with special reference to astigmatic accommodation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1946, 23:53-75.
142. Humphriss D The refraction of astigmatism at the reading distance. Dioptric News 1951, 6(7):234-235. 241.
143. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB Refraction in oblique meridians of the astigmatic eye. Br J Physiol Opt 1978, 32:59-77.
144. Hughes WL Changes in axis of astigmatism on accommodation. Arch Ophthalmol 1941, 26:742-749.
145. Rabbetts RB A comparison of astigmatism and cyclophoria in distance and near vision. Br J Physiol Opt 1972, 27:161-190.
146. Pascal JI The Pascal-Raubitscheck test for astigmatism. J Am Optom Assoc 1953, 25:491-495.
147. Raubitschek E The Raubitschek arrow test for astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 1952, 35:1334-1339.
148. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB Subjective refraction. Clinical Visual Optics, Ch 6 1984, 95-117. Butterworths, London. A.G. Bennett, R.B. Rabbetts (Eds.).
149. Borish IM Subjective testing. Chapter 17. Clinical Refraction 1970, 715-803. Professional Press., Chicago. 3rd ed. I.M. Borish (Ed.).
150. Heath GG The student clinician. Indiana Optometrist 1959, 29(3):6-7.
151. Bannon RE Recent developments in techniques for measuring astigmatism. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1958, 35:352-359.
152. Linksz A Determination of axis and amount of astigmatic error by rotation of trial cylinder. Arch Ophthalmol 1942, 28:632-651.
153. Posner A The head-tilt test for astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 1951, 34:1169-1170.
154. Walton WG Compensatory cyclo-torsion and visual acuity. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1951, 28:84-86.
155. Friedman B The Jackson crossed cylinder, a critique. Arch Ophthalmol 1940, 24:490-499.
156. Wunsch SE The cross cylinder. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1971, 11:131-153.
157. Crisp WH, Stine GH A further, very delicate test for astigmatic axis using the cross cylinder with an astigmatic dial and without the use of a letter chart. Am J Ophthalmol 1949, 32:1065-1068.
158. Stine GH The Crisp-Stine test for astigmatism and the Lebensohn astigmometer. Am J Ophthalmol 1950, 33:1587-1590.
159. Pascal JI The V test for astigmatism. Opt J Rev Optom 1952, 89(4):35-36.
160. Freeman P Refraction revisited. Optician 1992, 203:18. 22.
161. Freeman P Refraction revisited. Optician 1992, 204:21-22. 24.
162. Williamson-Noble FA A possible fallacy in the use of the cross cylinder. Br J Ophthalmol 1943, 27:1-12.
163. Schwarting BH Cross cylinder scan test for astigmatism. Arch Opthalmol 1969, 82:330-331.
164. Miller RG A new test for astigmatism-A preliminary report. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1961, 38:681-686.
165. Duke-Elder S, Abrams D Clinical methods of estimating the refraction. System of Ophthalmology, 5, Ophthalmic Optics and Refraction 1970, 383-447. CV Mosby, St. Louis. S. Duke-Elder (Ed.).
166. Adams RL, Kadet TC, White DM Comparative study of four-ball cylinder test, Jackson cross cylinder test, and near cylinder test. J Am Optom Assoc 1966, 37:547-549.
167. Knoll HA Measuring ametropia with a gas laser. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1966, 43:415-418.
168. Luckiesh M, Moss FK New methods of subjective refraction involving techniques in static and in dynamic tests. Arch Ophthalmol 1940, 23:941-956.
169. Ames A, Gliddon GH Ocular measurements. Trans Sect Ophthalmol AMA 1928, 79:102-175.
170. Bannon RE, Cooley FH, Fisher FM, Textor RT The stigmatoscopy method of determining the binocular refractive status. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1950, 27:371-383.
171. Humphrey WE A remote subjective refractor employing continuously variable sphere-cylinder corrections. Opt Engineering 1976, 15:286-291.
172. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB Vision screening, new subjective refractors and techniques. Clinical Visual Optics, Ch 19 1984, 398-408. Butterworths., London. A.G. Bennett, R.B. Rabbetts (Eds.).
173. Harwood LW Patient acceptance of the Humphrey Vision Analyzer. Rev Optom 1977, 114:49-50.
174. Kratz LD, Flom MC The Humphrey Vision Analyzer: Reliability and validity of refractive-error measures. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977, 54:653-659.
175. Barnes DA Astigmatic decomposition: An alternate subjective refraction test employing conventional instrumentation. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt 1984, 4:359-364.
176. Worthey JA Simplified analysis of meridional refraction data. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977, 54:771-775.
177. Salmon TO, Horner DG A new subjective refraction method-The meridional polarized vernier optometer. J Am Optom Assoc 1996, 67:599-605.
178. Freeman H The Freeman near-vision unit. Optician 1953, 126:453-457.
179. Freeman H Bichromatic methods and near vision refraction. Opt J Rev Optom 1954, 91(16):27-32.
180. Freeman H Bichromatic technique for distance and near refraction. Optician 1956, 132:497-503.
181. Giles GH Alternative subjective methods. The Principles and Practice of Refraction and Allied Subjects 1965, 165-196. Hammond., London. 2nd ed. G.H. Giles (Ed.).
182. Taylor SP An assessment of the Freeman unit for refractive balancing at near. Optician 1988, 196:16. 18, 20.
183. Humphriss D, Woodruff EW Refraction by immediate contrast. Br J Physiol Opt 1962, 19:15-20.
184. Smith D The estimation of the total refractive error without a cycloplegic. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otol 1930, 35:101-127.
185. Schneller SA The colorless Bichrome-A distance cross cylinder test. Optom Weekly 1966, 57(7):38.
186. Brooks CW A systematic method of trial frame subjective refraction. Optom Monthly 1982, 73:433-438.
187. Layton A A supplementary technique for balancing refraction. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975, 52:125-127.
188. Llewellyn P Binocularity and refractive correction. Optician 1989, 197:14-17.
189. Llewellyn P Binocular refraction procedures. Optician 1989, 197:16. 18-20, 22.
190. Lebensohn JE The pinhole test. Am J Ophthalmol 1950, 33:1612-1614.
191. Michaels DM Subjective methods of refraction. Visual Optics and Refraction 1985, 316-334. CV Mosby., St. Louis. 3rd ed. D.M. Michaels (Ed.).
192. Croyle FVN The pinhole or stenopaeic opening. Optician 1950, 119:545-550.
193. Hale JR Stenopaic vision. Optom Weekly 1964, 45:1003-1006.
194. Long WF Stenopaic slit refraction. Optom Weekly 1975, 66(39):33-36.
195. Bennett AG Refraction by automation? New applications of the Scheiner disc. Optician 1960, 139:5-9.
196. Westheimer G Refraction by automation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1957, 34:339-341.
197. Brubaker RF, Reinecke RD, Copeland JC Meridional refractometry. I. Derivation of equations. Arch Ophthalmol 1969, 81:849-852.
198. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB Refraction in oblique meridians of the astigmatic eye. Br J Physiol Opt 1978, 32:59-77.
199. Alvarez LW Development of variable-focus lenses and a new refractor. J Am Optom Assoc 1978, 49:24-29.
200. Humphrey WE A remote subjective refractor employing continuously variable sphere-cylinder corrections. Opt Engineering 1976, 15:286-291.
201. Humphrey WE Over-refraction and the Vision Analyzer. Optom Monthly 1980, 71:563-575.
202. Wong EK, Patella VM, Pratt MV, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Humphrey automatic refractor. Arch Ophthalmol 1984, 102:870-875.
203. Siemsen D, Berman M, Bielenberg MA, Korschner K Effectiveness of the Humphrey Vision Analyzer low vision slide on the partially sighted. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983, 60:798-803.
204. Perrigin DM, Perrigin J, Grosvenor T A clinical evaluation of the American Optical SR III subjective refractor. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982, 58:581-589.
205. Bannon RE A new automated subjective optometer. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977, 54:433-438.
206. Woo GC, Woodruff ME The AO SR III Subjective Refraction System: comparison with phoropter measures. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978, 55(8):591-596.
207. Grosvenor T, Perrigin DW, Perrigin J Comparison of American Optical SR-IV refractive data with clinical refractive data on a group of myopic children. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983, 60:224-235.
208. Perrigin DM, Grosvenor T, Perrigin J Comparison of refractive findings obtained by the Bausch & Lomb IVEX and by conventional clinical refraction. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985, 62:562-567.
209. Roggenkamp JR, Richardson NL, Krebsback JB, Yolton RL The IVEX refraction system: A clinical comparison. J Am Optom Assoc 1985, 56:532-536.
210. Westheimer G Accommodation levels during near cross cylinder tests. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1958, 35:599-604.
211. Marg E, Johnson DE, Anderson KW, et al. Computer-assisted eye examination. V. Preliminary evaluation of the Refractor III System for subjective examination. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977, 54:2-18.
212. Marg E, Anderson KW, Chung KO, Neroth CC Computer-assisted eye examination. VI. Identification and correction of errors in the Refractor III System for subjective refraction. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978, 55:249-266.
213. Marg E, Anderson KW, Chung KO, Neroth CC Computer-assisted eye examination. VII. Final evaluation of the Refractor III System for subjective examination after reducing software and hardware errors. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978, 55:317-330.
214. Baldwin WR, Stover WB Observation of laser standing wave pattern to determine refractive status. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1968, 45:143-151.
215. Haine C, Long W, Reading R Laser meridional refractometry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976, 53:194-204.
216. Whitefoot HD, Charman WN A comparison between laser and conventional subjective refraction. Ophthalmic Optician 1980, 20:169-173.
217. Phillips DE, McCarter GS, Dwyer WO Validity of the laser refraction technique for meridional measurement. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976, 53:447-450.
218. Morrell A, Charman WN A bichromatic laser optometer. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987, 64:790-795.
219. Charman WN, Whitefoot H Speckle motion in laser refraction. II. Experimental. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1979, 56:295-304.
220. Shickman GM Time-dependent functions in vision. Physiology of the Eye, Clinical Application 1981, 663-713. Mosby., St. Louis. R.A. Moses (Ed.).