Using Assistive Technology

Spinal Cord Injuries: Management and Rehabilitation

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 310-325

  Stiefbold, Gabriella ^a   Carolan, Terrence ^a  

^a KESSLER INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882489958     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-032300699-6.10013-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1994, P. L. 103-218, (March 9, 1994). 29 U.S.C. 2201 et seq: U.S. Statutes at Large, 108, 50-97.
2. Lange M.L., Smith R. Technology and occupation: contemporary viewpoints. Am J Occup Ther 2002, 56:107-109.
3. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistics Center: Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance, University of Alabama, Birmingham: . Accessed June 2006. http://www.spinalcord.uab.edu.
4. Rigby P., Ryan S., Joos S., et al. Impact of electronic aids to daily living on the lives of persons with cervical spinal cord injuries. Assist Technol 2005, 17:89-97.
5. Jutai J., Rigby P., Ryan S., et al. Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assist Technol 2000, 12:123-131.
6. Ripat J., Strock A. Users' perceptions of the impact of electronic aids to daily living throughout the acquisition process. Assist Technol 2004, 16:63-72.
7. Rust K.L., Smith R.O. Assistive technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health outcomes: a review and analysis of instruments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 84:780-793.
8. Anson D. Assistive technology. Pedretti's occupational therapy: practice skills for physical dysfunction 2006, Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis. ed 6. H.M. Pendleton, W. Schultz-Krohn (Eds.).
9. LiteTouch, Inc.: and Elan Home Systems: . Accessed September 25, 2007. http://www.smarthome.com.
10. Cook A.M., Polgar J.M. Cook and Hussey's assistive technologies: principles and practice 2008, Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis. ed 3.
11. Teirikangas J: HAVi white paper: or jussi.teirikangas.hut.fi. Accessed July 5, 2007. http://www.tml.tkk.fi/studies.
12. V2 standards whitepaper, V1.8, (revised February 2005): . Accessed July 5, 2007. http://www.myurc.org/whitepaper.php.
13. Craig A., Tran Y., McIsaac P., et al. The efficacy and benefits of environmental control systems for the severely disabled. Med Sci Monit 2005, 11. RA32-39.
14. MacNeil V. Electronic aids to daily living. Team Rehabil Rep 1998, 9:53-56.
15. McKinley W., Tewskbury M.A., Sitter P., et al. Assistive technology and computer adaptations for individuals with spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation 2004, 19:141-146.
16. Anson D. Computer and EADL access for individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2006, 11:42-60.
17. Chubon R.A., Hester M.R. An enhanced standard computer keyboard system for single-finger and typing-stick typing. J Rehabil Res Dev 1988, 25:17-24.
18. Kanny E.M., Anson D.K. A pilot study comparing mouse and mouse-emulating interface devices for graphic input. Assist Technol 1991, 3:50-58.
19. Holme S.A., Kanny E.M., Guthrie M.R., et al. The use of environmental control units by occupational therapists in spinal cord injury and disease services. Am J Occup Ther 1997, 51:42-48.
20. Shone S.M., Ryan S., Rigby P.J., et al. Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24:115-125.
21. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B: Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST): a new outcome measure. In Sprigle S, editor: Let's tango: partnering people and technology. Proceedings of RESNA 1997 annual conference, Arlington, VA, 1997, RESNA.