Talking and Doing Science. Important Elements in a Teaching-for-Understanding Approach

Teaching Science for Understanding

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 307-323

  Abrams, Eleanor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882481153     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012498360-1/50013-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Abrams E., Wandersee J.H. How to infuse actual scientific research practices into science classroom instruction. International Journal of Science Education 1995, 17:686-694.
2. Abrams E., Wandersee J.H. How does biological knowledge grow? A study of life scientists' research practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1995, 32(6):649-663.
3. Abrams, E., Moss, D., & Kull, J. K. Examining conceptual change in students in a project-oriented secondary science class. (in preparation).
4. Aikenhead G.S. Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education 1985, 64(4):453-475.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Projet 2061: Science for All Americans 1989, Author, Washington, DC.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Benchmarks for science literacy 1993, Author, Washington, DC.
7. Bybee R.W. Science education and the science-technology-society (STS) them. Science Education 1987, 71(5):667-683.
8. Cannella G.S. The effects of environmental structure on writing produced by young children. Child Study Journal 1988, 1813:207-221.
9. Clough M.P., Clark R. Cookbooks and constructivism: A better approach to laboratory activities. The Science Teacher 1994, 61(2):34-37.
10. Darwin C. The voyage of the Beagle 1962, Doubleday & Company, Inc., New York.
11. Duschl R. Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education 1988, 72(1):51-62.
12. Feyerabend P. Philosophical papers 1981, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Fleury S.C., Bentley M.L. Education elementary science teachers: Alternative conceptions of the nature of science. Teaching Education 1991, 3(2):57-67.
14. Gallas K. Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories responding with curricula 1995, Columbia University, Teachers College Press, New York.
15. Griffiths A.K., Barry M. High school students' views about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics 1995, 95(5):248-255.
16. Hodson D. Philosophy of science, science and science education. Studies in Science Education 1985, 12:25-57.
17. Hodson D. Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education 1988, 72(1):19-40.
18. Hodson D. Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science: Some preliminary findings. Interchange 1993, 24:41-52.
19. Hurd P. A nation reflects: The modernization of science education. Bulletin of Science Technology Society 1987, 7(1):9-13.
20. Lederman N.G. Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1992, 29(4):331-359.
21. Lemke J.L. Talking science: Language, learning, and values 1990, Ablex Publishing Corporation, New Jersey.
22. Martin B., Brouwer W. Exploring personal science. Science Education 1993, 77(4):441-459.
23. Meichtry Y.J. Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1992, 29(4):389-407.
24. Meichtry Y.J. The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1993, 30(5):429-443.
25. Mitroff I. Norms and counter-norms in a selected group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review American Sociological Review 1974, 39:579-595.
26. Mullis I., Jenkins K. The science report card: Elements of risk and recovery 1988, (Rep. No. 17-S-01), Author, Princeton, NJ.
27. National Research Council (NRC) National science education standards 1996, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
28. Pollak V.L. Science Education-I: The spirit of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology 1993, 2(4):513-519.
29. Pomeroy D. Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education 1993, 77(3):261-278.
30. Posner G.J., Strike K.A., Hewson P.W., Gertzog W.A. Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 1982, 66:211-227.
31. Ramsey G., Howe R.W. An analysis of research on instructional procedures in secondary school science. The Science Teacher 1969, 36(4):62-70.
32. Ryan A.G., Aikenhead G.S. Students' preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education 1992, 76(6):559-580.
33. Solomon J. Teaching about the nature of science in the British national curriculum. Science Education 1991, 75(1):95-103.
34. Stanley W.B., Brickhouse N.W. Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education 1994, 78(4):387-398.
35. Tobias S. They're not dumb-they're different: Stalking the second tier 1990, Research Corporation, Tucson, AZ.
36. Wolk S. Project-based learning: Pursuits with a purpose. Educational Leadership 1994, 52(3):42-55.
37. Wolpert L. The unnatural nature of science 1993, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.