Decoding the Free/Open Source Software Puzzle: A Survey of Theoretical and Empirical Contributions

The Economics of Open Source Software Development

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 15-55

  Rossi, Maria Alessandra ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882477653     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044452769-1/50002-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (142)

1. Aigrain P.A. Framework for Understanding the Impact of GPL Copylefting vs. Noncopylefting Licenses 2002, Working Paper, available at:. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/aigrain2.pdf.
2. Akerlof G.A., Kranton R.E. Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economies 2000, 115(3):715-753.
3. Allen R.C. Collective invention. Journal of Economie Behavior and Organization 1983, 41(1):1-24.
4. Baldwin C.Y., Clark K.B. Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free-Riding in the Open Source Development Model? 2003, Harvard Business School Working Paper, available at. http://www.people.hbs.edu/cbaldwin/DR2/BaldwinClark.ArchOSJun03.pdf.
5. Behlendorf B. Open source as a business strategy. Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution 1999, O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA. C. DiBona, S. Ockman, M. Stone (Eds.).
6. Benkler Y. Coase's penguin, or linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal 2002, 112(3):369-446.
7. Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. The power of gifts: Organizing social relationships in open source communities. Information Systems Journal 2001, 11(4):305-320.
8. Bessen J. What good is free software?. Government Policy toward Open Source Software 2002, 12-33. AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington DC. Hahn (Ed.).
9. Bezroukov N. Open source software development as a special type of academic research: Critique of vulgar raymondism. First Monday 1999, 4(10).
10. Bitzer J. Commercial versus open source software: The role of product heterogeneity in competition. Economic Systems 2004, 28(4):369-381.
11. Bitzer J., Schröder J.H. Bug-fixing and code-writing: The private provision of open source software. Information Economics and Policy 2005, 17(3):389-406.
12. Bobko P.K. Open source software and the demise of copyright. Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal 2001, 27:51-92.
13. Boettinger S., Burk D.L. Open source patenting. Journal of International Biotechnology Law 2004, 1(6):221-231.
14. Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. Why open source can succeed. Research Policy 2003, 32(7):1243-1258.
15. Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. Contributing to Common Pool Resources a Comparison between Individuals and Firms 2003, Working Paper, available at:, Sant' Anna School of Advanced Studies. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/bnaccorsirossidevelopers.pdf.
16. Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. Licensing Schemes in the Production and Distribution of Open Source Software: An Empirical Investigation 2003, Working Paper, available at:, Sant' Anna School of Advanced Studies. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/bnaccorsirossilicense.pdf.
17. Bowles S., Gintis H. The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity. Working Paper No. 2000-05 2000, University of Massachusetts.
18. Burk D.L. Open source genomics. Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 2002, 8(1):252-265.
19. Casadeus-Masanell R., Ghemawhat P. Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 04-012 2003.
20. Cohendet P., Creplet F., Dupouet O. Organisational innovation, communities of practice and epistemic communities: The case of linux. Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents 2001, 303-326. Springer, Berlin. A. Kirman, J.B. Zimmerman (Eds.).
21. Comino S., Manenti F. Open Source vs. Closed Source Software: Public Policies for the Software Market 2003, Working Paper, University of Padova.
22. Dalle Jean-Michel, David P.A. The allocation of resources for invention in 'open souce' production mode. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software 2005, 297-328. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA. S.A. Hissam, J.J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, K.R. Lakhani (Eds.).
23. Dalle Jean-Michel, David P.A. Simulating open source software development: The simcode large projects model. Management Science 2005, forthcoming.
24. Dalle Jean-Michel, Jullien N. NT vs. Linux, or some explorations into the economics of free software. Application of Simulation to Social Sciences 2000, 399-416. Hermés, Paris, France. G. Ballot, G. Weinsbuch (Eds.).
25. David P., Arora S., Steinmueller W.E. Economic organization and viability of open source software: A proposal to the national science foundation. Stanford Project on Economics of Open Source Software, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) 2001, available at:. http://siepr.stanford.edu/programs/OpenSoftware_David/NSF-CISE.
26. Deci E.L. The Psychology of Self-determination 1980, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
27. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior 1985, Plenum Press, New York.
28. Deci E.L., Koeastner R., Rayan R.M. Meta-analytic review of experiments: Examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychology Bullettin 1999, 123(3):627-668.
29. Dempsey B.J., Greenberg J., Jones P., Weiss D. A quantitative profile of a community of open source linux developers. Technical Report TR-1999-2005 1999, School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
30. Diamond D., Torvalds L. Just for fun: the story of an accidental revolutionary 2002, Harper Collins Publishers, New York, USA.
31. Edwards K., Epistemic Communities Situated Learning and Open Source Software Development 2001, Working Paper, available at:. http://edwards.dk/ec_sl_oss.pdf.
32. Ekeh P.P. Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions 1974, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.
33. Elster J. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order 1989, Cambridge University Press, New York.
34. Evans D.S. Politics and programming: Government preferences for promoting open source software. Government Policy toward Open Source Software 2002, 34-49. AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington DC. R.W. Hahn (Ed.).
35. Evans D.S., Reddy B. Government preferences for promoting open source software: A solution in search of a problem. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 2003, 9(2):313-394.
36. Feller J., Fitzgerald B. Understanding Open Source Software Development 2002, Addison Wesley, Boston, MA.
37. Fielding R.T. Shared leadership in the apache project. Communications of the ACM 1999, 42(4):42-43.
38. Foray D., Zimmerman J.-B. L'économie du logiciel libre: Organisation coopérative et incitation a l'innovation. Revue Economique 2001, 51:77-93.
39. Frank E., Jungwirth C. Reconciling rent-seekers and donators - the governance structure of open source. Journal of Management and Governance 2003, 7(4):401-421.
40. Franke N., von Hippel E. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of apache security software. Research Policy 2003, 32(7):1199-1215.
41. Ghosh R.A., Prakash V.V. The orbiten free software survey. First Monday 2000, 5(7).
42. Gomulkiewitz R.W. How copyleft uses license rights to succeed in the open source software revolution and the implications for article 2b. Houston Law Review 1999, 36(1):179-194.
43. Gosh R.A., Glott R., Kreiger B., Robles G. The free/libre and open source software developers survey and study - FLOSS final report 2002, available at:. http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/report.
44. Grossman S.J., Hart O.D. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 1986, 94(4):691-719.
45. Hahn R.W. Government Policy toward Open Source Software 2002, AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington DC.
46. Hann I.-H., et al. Delayed Returns to Open Source Participation: An Empirical Analysis of the Apache http Server Project 2002, Working Paper, available at:. http://www.idei.asso.fr/commun/Conferences/Internet/OSS2002/Papiers/Hann .PDF.
47. Harhoff D., Henkel J., von Hippel E. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy 2003, 32(10):1753-1769.
48. Hars A., Ou S. Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2002, 6(3):25-40.
49. Hart O.D. Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
50. Hart O.D., Moore J. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 1990, 98(6):1119-1158.
51. Hawkins R.E. The economics of the open source software for a competitive firm: Why give it away for free?. Netnomics 2004, 6(2):103-117.
52. Healy K., Schussman A. The Ecology of Open Source Software Development 2003, Working Paper, available at:. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/healyschussman.pdf.
53. Hecker F. Setting up shop: The business of open-source software. IEEE Software 1999, 16(1):45-51.
54. Heller M., Eisenberg R.S. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomédical research. Science 1998, 280(5364):698-701.
55. Henkel J. Open source software from commercial firms: Tools, complements, and collective invention. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB) 2002, 74(4):1-24. Special Issue.
56. Hertel G., Niedner S., Hermann S. Motivation of software developers in the open source projects: An internet-based survey of contributors to the linux kernel. Research Policy 2002, 32(7):1159-1177.
57. Hicks D., Breitzman T., Olivastro D., Hamilton K. The changing composition of innovative activity in the US: A portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy 2001, 30(4):681-704.
58. Hirsh F. The Social Limits to Growth 1976, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
59. Holmstrom B. Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Review of Economic Studies 1999, 66(226):169-182.
60. Home N.T. Open source software licensing: Using copyright law to encourage free use. Georgia State University Law Review 2001, 17(3):863.
61. Hunt F., Johnson P. On the pareto distribution of sourceforge projects. Proceedings of the Open source Software Development Workshop 2002, 122-129.
62. Jarvinen H. Legal aspects of open source licensing mimeo 2002, available at:. https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/campa/teaching/oss/papers/jarvinen.pdf.
63. Johnson J.P. Open source software: Public provision of a public good. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 2002, 11(4):637-662.
64. Jorgensen N. Putting it all in the trunk: Incremental software development in the free/bsd open source project. Information Systems Journal 2001, 11(4):305-320.
65. Kahin B. The patent threat to open source software. Report of the Georgetown University 2002 Open Source Summit: Public Interest and Policy Issues 2002, 42-52. D.L. Garcia (Ed.).
66. Kelty C.M. Free software/free science. First Monday 2001, 6(12).
67. Kennedy D.M. A primer on open source licensing legal issues: Copyright, copyleft and copyfuture 2001, Available at. http://www.denniskennedy.com/opensourcedmk.pdf.
68. Koch S., Schneider G. Effort, co-operation and co-ordination in an open source software project: Gnome. Information Systems Journal 2002, 12(1):27-42.
69. Kogut B., Methiu A. Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2001, 17(2):248-264.
70. Kollock P. The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. Communities in Cyberspace 1999, 220-242. Routledge, London, UK. M. Smith, P. Kollock (Eds.).
71. Kollock P., Smith M. Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives 1996, 109-128. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. S. Herring (Ed.).
72. Krishnamurthy S. Cave or community? an empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. First Monday 2002, 7(6).
73. Kuan J. Open source software as consumer integration into production 2001, SSRN Working Paper, available at:. http://www.papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract.id=259648.
74. Lakhani K., von Hippel E. How open source software works: 'free' user-to-user assistance. Research Policy 2003, 32(6):923-943.
75. Lakhani K., Wolf R.G. Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation efforts in free/open source projects. Perspectives in Free and Open Source Software 2005, 3-21. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA. S.A. Hissam, B. Fitzgerald, J. Feller, K.R. Lakhani (Eds.).
76. Lakhani K., Wolf R., Bates J., DiBona C. The boston consulting group hacker survey, release 0.73 2002, available at:. http://www.ostg.com/bcg/BCGHACKERSURVEY-0.73.pdf.
77. Lanjouw J.O., Shankerman M. Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics 2001, 32(1):129-151.
78. Lave J., Wenger E. Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
79. Lee S.H. Open source software licensing 1999, Working Paper, available at:. http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/gpl.pdf.
80. Lee J. Open source software licenses and innovation 2003, Working Paper, available at:. http://VirtualGoods.tuilmenau.de/2003/licenses.innovation.leejz.pdf.
81. Lee S., Moisa N., Weiss M. Open source as a signaling device: An economic analysis. Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting No. 102 2003, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main.
82. Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics 2002, 50(2):197-234.
83. Lerner J., Tirole J. The scope of open source licensing. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 2005, 21(1):20-56.
84. Lessig L. Open source baselines: Compared to what?. Government Policy toward Open Source Software 2002, 50-68. AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington DC. R.W. Hahn (Ed.).
85. Lindenberg S. Intrinsic motivation in a new light. Kyklos 2001, 54(2-3):317-343.
86. Ljungberg J. Open source movements as a model for organizing. European Journal of Information Systems 2000, 9(4):208-216.
87. Mateos-Garcia J., Steinmuller W.E. The Open Source Way of Working: A New Paradigm for the Division of Labour in Software Development?. INK Open Source Research Working Paper No. 1 2003, SPRU-University of Sussex, Brighton, England.
88. Maurer S. New Institutions for Doing Science: From Databases to Open Source Biology. Paper presented at the European Policy for Intellectual Property Conference 2003, available at. http://www.merit.unimaas.nl/epip/papers/maurer_paper.pdf.
89. Mauss M. The Gift. Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies 1954, Cohen and West, London.
90. McGowan D. Legal implications of open-source software. University of Illinois Law Review 2001, 1:241-304.
91. McJohn S.M. The paradoxes of free software. George Mason Law Review 2000, 9(1):25-68.
92. Meurer M.J. Controlling opportunistic and anticompetitive intellectual property litigation. Boston College Law Review 2003, 44(2):509-544.
93. Mockus A., Fielding R., Herbsleb J. A case study of open source software development: The apache server. Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2000) 2000, 263-272.
94. Moglen E. Anarchism triumphant: Free software and the death of copyright. First Monday 1999, 4(8).
95. Morrison P., Roberts J., von Hippel E. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science 2000, 46(12):1513-1527.
96. Mustonen M. Copyleft - The economics of linux and other open source software. Information Economics and Policy 2003, 15(1):99-121.
97. Nadan C.H. Open source licensing: Virus or virtue?. Texas Intellectual Property Journal 2002, 10(3).
98. Naidu S. The emergence of governance conventions in open source projects 2004, Mimeo, Santa Fe Institute.
99. Neumann P.G. Robust non-proprietary software. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Symposium on security and privacy 2000, 122-123.
100. Nguyen G.D., Pénard T. Don et coopération dans internet: Une nouvelle organization économique?. Terminal 1999, 80-81.
101. Nilendu P., Madanmohan T.R. Competing on open source: Strategies and practise 2002, Working Paper, available at:. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/madanmohan.pdf.
102. Oksanen V., Valimaki M. Evaluation of open source licensing models for a company developing mass market software. Proceeding (375) Law and Technology 2002, 835. Cambridge, US.
103. O'Mahony S. Community Managed Software Projects: The Emergence of a New Commercial Actor. PhD Thesis 2002, Stanford University.
104. O'Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How do community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy 2003, 32(7):1179-1198.
105. Osterhout J. Free software needs profit. Communications of the ACM 1999, 42(4):44-45.
106. Osterloh M., Rota S., Von Wartburg M. Open Source - New Rules in Software Development 2001, University of Zurich Working Paper, available at:. http://www.unizh.ch/ifbf/orga/downloads/opensourceaom.pdf.
107. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
108. Pagano U. Is power an economic good? Notes on social scarcity and the economics of positional goods. The Politics and the Economics of Power 1999, 63-84. Routledge, London. S. Bowles, M. Franzini, U. Pagano (Eds.).
109. Pagano U. Legal positions and institutional complementarities. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica n. 360 2002, Universitá di Siena.
110. Perens B. The open source definition. Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution 1999, 171-188. O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA. C. DiBona, S. Ockman, M. Stone (Eds.).
111. Ravicher D.B. Facilitating collaborative software development: The enforceability of mass-market public software licenses. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology 2000, 5(3):11.
112. Raymond E.S. The cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday 1998, 3(3).
113. Raymond E.S. Homesteading the noosphere. First Monday 1998, 3(10).
114. Rosen L. Which open source license should I use for my software? 2001, mimeo, available at:. http://www.rosenlaw.com/html/GL5.pdf.
115. Samuelson P., Davis R., Kapor M., Reichman J.H. A manifesto concerning the legal protection of computer programs. Columbia Law Review 1994, 94(8).
116. Schmidt K., Schnitzer M. Public subsidies for open source? Some economic policy issues of the software market. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 2003, 16(2):473-488.
117. Schweik C.M., Semenov A. The institutional design of open source programming: implications for addressing complex public policy and management problems. First Monday 2003, 8(1).
118. Shapiro C., Varian H. Linux adoption in the public sector: An economic analysis 2004, University of California Working Paper, available at:. http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/hal/Papers/2004/linux-adoption.
119. Simon H.A. Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1991, 5(2):25-44.
120. Smith B.L. The future of software: Enabling the marketplace to decide. Government Policy toward Open Source Software 2002, 69-86. AEI Brooking Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington DC. Hahn (Ed.).
121. Stallman R. What is copyleft? 1984, Available at:. http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html.
122. Stuart K.J., Gosain S. Impact of ideology, trust and communication on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quarterly 2005, forthcoming.
123. Torvalds L. What motivates free developers?. First Monday 1998, 3(3).
124. Torvalds L. The linux edge. Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution 1999, 101-112. O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol. C. DiBona, S. Ockman, M. Stone (Eds.).
125. Tuomi I. Internet, innovation, and open source: Actors in the network. First Monday 2001, 6(1).
126. Valimaki M. Dual licensing in open source software industry. Sistémes d'Information et de Management 2003, 8(1):63-75.
127. Valloppillil V. Open source software: A new development methodology? 1998, Working Paper, available at, Known as the "Halloween document. http://www.catb.org/~esr/halloween/halloweenl.html.
128. von Hippel E. The Sources of Innovation 1988, Oxford University Press, New York.
129. von Hippel E. Horizontal Innovation Networks: By and for users. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper No. 4366-02 2002.
130. von Hippel E., von Kogh G. Open source software and the "private-collective" innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science 2003, 14(2):208-223.
131. von Krogh G. Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review 1998, 40(3):133-153.
132. von Krogh G. The communal resource and information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2002, 11(2):85-107.
133. von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. Community, join, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy 2003, 32(7):1217-1241.
134. Weber S. The Political Economy of Open Source Software. BRIE Working Paper 140, E-conomy Project, Working Paper 15 2000.
135. West J. How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy 2003, 32(7):1259-1285.
136. Wichmann T. Basics of open source software markets and business models. Free/Libre and open source Software: Survey and Study, FLOSS Final Report 2002, International Institute of Infonomics, Berlecom Research GmbH.
137. Wichmann T. Firms' open source activities: Motivations and policy implications. Free/Libre and open source Software: Survey and Study, FLOSS Final Report 2002, International Institute of Infonomics, Berlecom Research GmbH.
138. Xu X. Development costs and open source software 2002, Working Paper, available at:. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/xxu.pdf.
139. Young R. Giving it away: How red hat software stumbled across a new economic model and helped improve an industry. Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution 1999, 113-126. O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol. C. DiBona, S. Ockman, M. Stone (Eds.).
140. Zeitlyn D. Gift economies in the development of open source software: Anthropological reflections. Research Policy 2003, 32(7):1287-1291.
141. Zhang W., Storck J. Peripheral members in online communities. Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems 2001 (AM-CIS 2001) 2001.
142. Zimmerman J.-B. Logiciels et propriété intellectuelle: du copyright au copyleft. Terminal 1999, 80-81:95-116. (Special Issue: Le logiciel libre).