Long-term bladder drainage: Suprapubic catheter versus other methods: A scoping review

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 944-951

  Hunter, Kathleen F ^a   Bharmal, Aamir ^b   Moore, Katherine N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

bladder dysfunction; catheter complications; catheterization; long term catheterization; quality of life; urethral indwelling catheters

Indexed keywords

BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLADDER EMPTYING; BLADDER STONE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; INDWELLING URINARY CATHETER; INTERMITTENT CATHETERIZATION; LONG TERM CARE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PUBLICATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; REFERENCE DATABASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SKIN CARE; SUPRAPUBIC CATHETER; SUPRAPUBIC CATHETERIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; URETHRA INJURY; URETHRA STRICTURE; URINARY STOMA; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINARY TRACT INJURY; URINE INCONTINENCE; UROLITHIASIS; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; BLADDER; CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; INDWELLING CATHETER; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER DISEASES; URINARY CATHETER; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS;

CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY BLADDER DISEASES; URINARY CATHETERIZATION; URINARY CATHETERS; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS;

EID: 84882455209     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22356     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. National Patient Safety Agency. Rapid Response report NPSA/2009/RRR05: Minimising risks of suprapubic catheter insertion (adults only). 2009; NPSA/2009/RRR05.
2. Harrison SCW, Lawrence WT, Morley R, et al. British Association of Urological Surgeons' suprapubic catheter practice guidelines. BJU Int 2011; 107: 77-85.
3. Feifer A, Corcos J,. Contemporary role of suprapubic cystostomy in treatment of neuropathic bladder dysfunction in spinal cord injured patients. Neurourol Urodyn 2008; 27: 475-9.
4. Ahmed SJ, Mehta A, Rimington P,. Delayed bowel perforation following suprapubic catheter insertion. BMC Urol 2004; 4: 16.
5. Gormley EA,. Urologic complications of the neurogenic bladder. Urol Clin North Am 2010; 37: 601-7.
6. West DA, Cummings JM, Longo WE, et al. Role of chronic catheterization in the development of bladder cancer in patients with spinal cord injury. Urology 1999; 53: 292-7.
7. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Urinary incontinence in neurological disease: Management of lower urinary tract dysfunction in neurological disease. NICE Clinical Guideline 148, 2012. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13855/60379/60379.pdf.
8. Jamison J, Maguire S, McCann J,. Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 12: 004375.
9. Grant MJ, Booth A,. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libr J 2009; 26: 91-108.
10. Arksey H, O'Malley L,. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8: 19-32.
11. Dixon L, Dolan LM, Brown K, et al. RCT of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Nurs 2010; 19: S7-13.
12. Hammarsten J, Lindqvist K,. Suprapubic catheter following transurethral resection of the prostate: A way to decrease the number of urethral strictures and improve the outcome of operations. J Urol 1992; 147: 648-51 discussion 651-2.
13. Hammarsten J, Lindqvist K, Sunzel H,. Urethral strictures following transurethral resection of the prostate. The role of the catheter. Br J Urol 1989; 63: 397-400.
14. Roe BH,. Study of the effects of education on patients' knowledge and acceptance of their indwelling urethral catheters. J Adv Nurs 1990; 15: 223-31.
15. Sethia KK, Selkon JB, Berry AR, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 624-5.
16. Ichsan J, Hunt DR,. Suprapubic catheters: A comparison of suprapubic versus urethral catheters in the treatment of acute urinary retention. Aust N Z J Surg 1987; 57: 33-6.
17. Horgan AF, Prasad B, Waldron DJ, et al. Acute urinary retention. Comparison of suprapubic and urethral catheterisation. Br J Urol 1992; 70: 149-51.
18. Bothig R, Hirschfeld S, Thietje R,. Quality of life and urological morbidity in tetraplegics with artificial ventilation managed with suprapubic or intermittent catheterisation. Spinal Cord 2012; 50: 247-51.
19. Hackler RH,. Long-term Suprapubic cystostomy drainage in spinal cord injury patients. Br J Urol 1982; 54: 120-1.
20. Katsumi HK, Kalisvaart JF, Ronningen LD, et al. Urethral versus suprapubic catheter: Choosing the best bladder management for male spinal cord injury patients with indwelling catheters. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 325-9.
21. Ku JH, Choi WJ, Lee KY, et al. Complications of the upper urinary tract in patients with spinal cord injury: A long-term follow-up study. Urol Res 2005; 33: 435-9.
22. Mitsui T, Minami K, Furuno T, et al. Is suprapubic cystostomy an optimal urinary management in high quadriplegics?. A comparative study of suprapubic cystostomy and clean intermittent catheterization. Eur Urol 2000; 38: 434-8.
23. Pannek J, Gocking K, Bersch U,. To clamp or not to clamp? Bladder management by suprapubic catheterization in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. World J Urol 2010; 28: 637-41.
24. Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR,. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol 2000; 163: 768-72.
25. Ahluwalia RS, Johal N, Kouriefs C, et al. The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 210-3.
26. Hamid R, Bycroft J, Arya M, et al. Screening cystoscopy and biopsy in patients with neuropathic bladder and chronic suprapubic indwelling catheters: Is it valid? J Urol 2003; 170: 425-7.
27. MacDiarmid SA, Arnold EP, Palmer NB, et al. Management of spinal cord injured patients by indwelling suprapubic catheterization. J Urol 1995; 154: 492-4.
28. Nomura S, Ishido T, Teranishi J, et al. Long-term analysis of suprapubic cystostomy drainage in patients with neurogenic bladder. Urol Int 2000; 65: 185-9.
29. Sugimura T, Arnold E, English S, et al. Chronic suprapubic catheterization in the management of patients with spinal cord injuries: Analysis of upper and lower urinary tract complications. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1396-400.
30. Sheriff MK, Foley S, McFarlane J, et al. Long-term suprapubic catheterisation: Clinical outcome and satisfaction survey. Spinal Cord 1998; 36: 171-6.
31. Jewes LA, Gillespie WA, Leadbetter A, et al. Bacteriuria and bacteraemia in patients with long-term indwelling catheters-A domiciliary study. J Med Microbiol 1988; 26: 61-5.
32. Brillhart B,. Studying the quality of life and life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury undergoing urinary management. Rehabil Nurs 2004; 29: 122-6.
33. Kralik D, Seymour L, Eastwood S, et al. Managing the self: Living with an indwelling urinary catheter. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 177-85.
34. Sweeney A, Harrington A, Button D,. Suprapubic catheters-A shared understanding, from the other side looking in. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34: 418-24.
35. Wilde MH, Cameron BL,. Meanings and practical knowledge of people with long-term urinary catheters. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2003; 30: 33-40 discussion 40-3.
36. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50: 625-63.
37. Vaidyanathan S, Soni BM, Singh G, et al. Fatality due to septicemia and hemorrhage in a patient with spinal cord injury and ischemic heart disease with the need for long-term catheter drainage. Adv Ther 2006; 23: 354-8.
38. Moore KN, Hunter KF, McGinnis R, et al. Do catheter washouts extend patency time in long-term indwelling urethral catheters? A randomized controlled trial of acidic washout solution, normal saline washout, or standard care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009; 36: 82-90.