The assessment of teachers

Teaching Education

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 279-300

  Hattie, John ^a   Clinton, Janet ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNITEC INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882423631     PISSN: 10476210     EISSN: 14701286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10476210120096551     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. AERA/APA/NMCE. 1999. “ The Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests ”.
2. BACHARACH, S.B., CONLEY, S.C., and SHEDD, J.B., 1990. The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers, Edited by: MILLMAN, J., and DARLING-HAMMOND, L., 133–146. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. BAKER, A.P., XU, D., and DETCH, E., 1995. The measure of education: A review of the Tennessee Value Added Assessment System, Knoxville, TN: Comptroller of the Treasury Report, Office of Education Accountability.
4. BIGGS, J.B., and COLLIS, K.F., 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome), New York: Academic Press.
5. BOCK, R.D., and WOLFE, R., 1996. Audit and review of the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Final report of the Treasury, Nashville, TN: Tennessee: Comptroller Office.
6. BOND, L., SMITH, R., BAKER, W.K., and HATTIE, J.A., 2000. Certi? cation system of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: A construct and consequential validity study, Washington, DC: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.