Effects of chronic noise exposure on speech-in-noise perception in the presence of normal audiometry

Journal of Laryngology and Otology

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 233-238

  Hope, A J ^a   Luxon, L M ^b,c   Bamiou, D E ^b,c  

^a DERRIFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Central Auditory Processing Disorder; Hearing Loss; Noise Induced; Speech Perception; Trauma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRPLANE CREW; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MALE; NOISE; NOISE INJURY; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOSCOPY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPEECH; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS; MALE; NOISE, OCCUPATIONAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84882395732     PISSN: 00222151     EISSN: 17485460     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S002221511200299X     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Noise atwork. In: http://www.hse.gov.uk/noise/[14 December 2012]
2. Palmer KT, Griffin MJ, Syddall HE, Davis A, Pannett B, Coggon D. Occupational exposure to noise and the attributable burden of hearing difficulties in Great Britain. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:634-9 (Pubitemid 34983591)
3. Noise. In: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/noise.html [14 December 2012]
4. Dobie RA. Noise-induced hearing loss. In: Bailey BJ, ed. Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998;1782-92
5. The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005. In: http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/1643/contents/made [13 December 2012]
6. Saunders JC, Dear SP, Schneider ME. The anatomical consequences of acoustic injury: a review and tutorial. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;78:833-60 (Pubitemid 15019036)
7. Saunders JC, Cohen YE, Szymko YM. The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury in the cochlea and peripheral auditory system: a five year update. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90:136-46
8. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth. J Neurosci 2006;26:2115-23
9. Basta D, Tzschentke B, Ernst A. Noise-induced cell death in the mouse medial geniculate body and primary auditory cortex. Neurosci Lett 2005;381:199-204 (Pubitemid 40693169)
10. Wang J, Salvi RJ, Powers N. Plasticity of response properties of inferior colliculus neurons following acute cochlea damage. J Neurophysiol 1996;75:171-83 (Pubitemid 26072032)
11. Kpper TE, Steffgen J, Jansing P. Noise exposure during alpine helicopter rescue. Ann Occup Hyg 2004;48:475-81 (Pubitemid 38993756)
12. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990;11:93-105 (Pubitemid 20169173)
13. Hurley RM, Musiek FE. Effectiveness of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level. J Am Acad Audiol 1994;5:195-203
14. Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990;43:251-62
15. Brown GJ, Ferry RT, Meddis R. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127:943-54
16. Ceranic BJ, Prasher DK, Raglan E, Luxon LM. Tinnitus after head injury: evidence from otoacoustic emissions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:523-9 (Pubitemid 28438885)
17. Moore DR, Ferguson MA, Edmondson-Jones AM, Ratib S, Riley A. Nature of auditory processing disorder in children. Pediatrics 2010;126:e382-90
18. Desai A, Reed D, Richards S, Prasher D. Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise. Noise Health 1999;1:58-65
19. Peng JH, Tao ZZ, Huang ZW. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength. Neuroreport 2007;18:1167-70
20. Mukari SZS, Mamat WHW. Medial olivocochlear functioning and speech perception in noise in older adults. Audiol Neurootol 2008;13:328-34
21. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Kotylo P. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission efferent suppression. Int J Audiol 2002;41:113-19 (Pubitemid 37390984)
22. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after temporary noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 2009;29:14077-85
23. Kraus N, Bradlow AR, Cheatham MA, Cunningham J, King CD, Koch DB et al. Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2000;1: 33-45 (Pubitemid 32405390)
24. Zeng FG, Kong YY, Michalewski HJ, Starr A. Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:3050-63 (Pubitemid 40720888)
25. Brattico E, Kujala T, Tervaniemi M, Alku P, Ambrosi L, Monitillo V. Long-term noise exposure altered the strength and the hemispheric organization of speech-sound discrimination and decreased the speed of sound-change processing. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:190-203
26. Kujala T, Shtyrov Y, Winkler I, Saher M, Tervaniemi M, Sallinen M et al. Long-term exposure to noise impairs cortical sound processing and attention control. Psychophysiology 2004;41:875-81 (Pubitemid 40051475)
27. Moore DR, Ferguson M, Halliday F, Riley A. Frequency discrimination in children; perception, learning and attention. Hear Res 2008;238:147-54
28. Tramo MJ, Cariani PA, Koh CK, Makris N, Braida LD. Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of pitch perception: auditory cortex. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1060:148-74
29. Schmuziger N, Patscheke J, Probst R. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians. Ear Hear 2006;27:321-30 (Pubitemid 44357170)