Flow diversion to treat aneurysms: The free segment of stent

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 452-457

  Darsaut, Tim E ^a   Bing, Fabrice ^b   Makoyeva, Alina ^c   Gevry, Guylaine ^c   Salazkin, Igor ^c   Raymond, Jean ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF STRASBOURG   (France)

^c CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d NOTRE DAME HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEURYSM; ANEURYSM SURGERY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLOW DIVERSION; FREE STENT SEGMENT; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; NEOINTIMA; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SHEAR STRESS; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; POROSITY; STENTS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84882356667     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010451     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, et al. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2008;62:1115-20.
2. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632-42.
3. McAuliffe W, Wycoco V, Rice H, et al. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164-70.
4. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, et al. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34-40.
5. Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139-47.
6. Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Bartolini B, et al. Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032-8.
7. Canton G, Levy DI, Lasheras JC. Hemodynamic changes due to stent placement in bifurcating intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005;103:146-55.
8. Canton G, Levy DI, Lasheras JC, et al. Flow changes caused by the sequential placement of stents across the neck of sidewall cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005;103:891-902.
9. Darsaut T, Bouzeghrane F, Salazkin I, et al. The effects of stenting and endothelial denudation on aneurysm and branch occlusion in experimental aneurysm models. J Vasc Surg 2007;45:1228-35.
10. Fiorella D, Hsu D, Woo HH, et al. Very late thrombosis of a pipeline embolization device construct: case report. Neurosurgery 2010;67:onsE313-4.
11. Kulcsar Z, Ernemann U, Wetzel SG, et al. High-profile flow diverter (silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 2010;41:1690-6.
12. Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20-5.
13. Meng H, Wang Z, Kim M, et al. Saccular aneurysms on straight and curved vessels are subject to different hemodynamics: implications of intravascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1861-5.
14. Mut F, Cebral JR. Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Published online first 3 May 2012. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3080.
15. Aurboonyawat T, Blanc R, Schmidt P, et al. An in vitro study of silk stent morphology. Neuroradiology 2011;53:659-67.
16. Makoyeva A, Bing F, Darsaut TE, et al. The varying porosity of braided self-expanding stents and flow-diverters: an experimental study. Am J Neuroradiol 2012 (in press).
17. Darsaut TE, Bing F, Salazkin I, et al. Flow diverters fail to occlude experimental bifurcation or curved side-wall aneurysms: an in vivo study in canines. J Neurosurg 2012 (in press).
18. Horowitz M, Levy E, Sauvageau E, et al. Intra/extra-aneurysmal stent placement for management of complex and wide-necked-bifurcation aneurysms: eight cases using the waffle cone technique. Neurosurgery 2006;58:ONS-258-62; discussion ONS-262.
19. Darsaut TE, Bing F, Salazkin I, et al. Flow diverters can occlude aneurysms and preserve arterial branches: a new experimental model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Published online first 3 May 2012. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3075.
20. Cebral JR, Castro MA, Appanaboyina S, et al. Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457-67.
21. Kim M, Taulbee DB, Tremmel M, et al. Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:726-41.
22. Lieber BB, Sadasivan C. Endoluminal scaffolds for vascular reconstruction and exclusion of aneurysms from the cerebral circulation. Stroke 2010;41:S21-5.
23. Lieber BB, Stancampiano AP, Wakhloo AK. Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting: influence of stent porosity. Ann Biomed Eng 1997;25:460-9.
24. Appanaboyina S, Mut F, Löhner R, et al. Simulation of intracranial aneurysm stenting: techniques and challenges. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2009;198:3567-82.
25. Lieber BB, Gounis MJ. The physics of endoluminal stenting in the treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms. Neurol Res 2002;24(Suppl 1):S33-42.
26. Sadasivan C, Cesar L, Seong J, et al. An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952-8.
27. Darsaut TE, Bing F, Salazkin I, et al. Testing flow diverters in giant fusiform aneurysms: a new experimental model can show leaks responsible for failures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2175-9.
28. Ford MD, Lee SW, Lownie SP, et al. On the effect of parent-aneurysm angle on flow patterns in basilar tip aneurysms: towards a surrogate geometric marker of intra-aneurismal hemodynamics. J Biomech 2008;41:241-8.
29. Hoi Y, Meng H, Woodward SH, et al. Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676-81.
30. Rhee K, Han MH, Cha SH. Changes of flow characteristics by stenting in aneurysm models: influence of aneurysm geometry and stent porosity. Ann Biomed Eng 2002;30:894-904.
31. Appanaboyina S, Mut F, Löhner R, et al. Computational fluid dynamics of stented intracranial aneurysms using adaptive embedded unstructured grids. Int J Numerical Methods Fluids 2008;57:475-93.
32. Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, et al. A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346-52.