Receiving group clinical supervision: A phenomenological study

British Journal of Nursing

Volumn 22, Issue 15, 2013, Pages 861-866

  Taylor, Claire ^a  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biofeedback; Group supervision; Phenomenology; Professional development; Reflection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882356450     PISSN: 09660461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.15.861     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arvidsson B, Baigi A, Skarsater I (2008) Changes in the effects of processoriented group supervision as reported by female and male nursing students: a prospective longitudinal study. Scand J Caring Sci 22(3): 437-44
2. Bion W (1962) Learning From Experiences. Heinemann, London
3. Brandt DE (1996) Similarities between psychoanalytic supervision and other forms of analytic consultation. The Clinical Supervisor 14(2):99-107
4. Buus N, Angel S, Traynor M, Gonge H (2011) Psychiatric nursing staff members' reflections on participating in group-based clinical supervision: a semi-structured interview study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 20(2): 95-101
5. Casement P (1985) On Learning from the Patient. Tavistock Publications, London
6. Colaizzi PF (1978) Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Valle R, Kings M, eds. Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York: 48-71
7. Deery R (2005) An action-research study exploring midwives' support needs and the affect of group clinical supervision. Midwifery 21(2): 161-176
8. Holmlund K, Lindgren B, Athlin E (2010) Group supervision for nursing students during their clinical placements: its content and meaning. J Nurs Manag 18(6): 678-88
9. Lindgren B, Brulin C, Holmlund K, Athlin E (2005) Nursing students' perception of group supervision during clinical training. J Clin Nurs 14(7): 822-9
10. Lynch L, Happell B (2008) Implementation of clinical supervision in action: Part 2: implementation and beyond. Int J Ment Health Nurs 17(1): 65-72
11. Mason J (2002) Qualitative interviewing: asking, listening and interpreting. In: May T, eds. Qualitative Research in Action. Sage Publications, London: 225-41
12. Norton C, Chelvanayagam S (2004) Bowel Continence Nursing. Beaconsfield Publishers, Beaconsfield
13. Parahoo K (2006) Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire
14. Platzer H, Blake D, Ashford D (2000) An evaluation of process and outcomes from learning through reflective practice groups on a post-registration nursing course. J Adv Nurs 31(3): 689-95
15. Schön D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York
16. Stessman M (2003) Biofeedback: its role in the treatment of chronic constipation. Gastroenterol Nurs 26(6): 251-60
17. Stevenson C (2005) Post-modernising clinical supervision in nursing. Issues Ment Health Nurs 26(5): 519-29
18. Thorne S (2000) Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs 3(3) 68-70
19. van Manen M (1990) Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press, Albany
20. Whitehead WE (1992) Biofeedback treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 17(1): 59-76
21. Williams L, Irvine F (2009) How can the clinical supervisor role be facilitated in nursing: a phenomenological exploration. J Nurs Manag 17(4): 474-83