Combination of energy policy instruments: Creation of added value or overlapping?

Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 46-56

  Oikonomou, V ^a   Flamos, A ^b   Grafakos, S ^c  

^a Joint Implementation Network   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PIRAEUS   (Greece)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

certificates; energy policy instruments; energy tax; interactions; labelling; subsidies

Indexed keywords

CERTIFICATES; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; ENERGY AND CLIMATE POLICIES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS; ENERGY TAXES; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE; SUBSIDIES;

BEAM PLASMA INTERACTIONS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; LABELING; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; TAXATION;

INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 84882308193     PISSN: 15567249     EISSN: 15567257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15567241003716696     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agnolucci, P. 2007. The effect of financial constraints, technological progress and long-term contracts on tradable green ertificates. Energ. Policy 35:3347-3359. (Pubitemid 46506134)
2. Alfsen, K. H., Birkelund, H., and Aaserud, M. 1995. Impacts of an EC carbon/energy tax and deregulating thermal power upply on CO2, SO2 and NOx emissions. Environ. Resour. Econ. 5:165-189.
3. Birkelund, H., Gjelsvik, E., and Aaserud, M. 1994. The EU carbon/energy tax effects in a distorted energy market. Energ. olicy 22:657-665.
4. Bjorner, T. B., and Jensen, H. H. 2002. Energy taxes, voluntary agreements and investment subsidies - A micro-panel nalysis of the effect on Danish industrial companies' energy demand. Resour. Energ. Econ. 24:229-249. (Pubitemid 34724850)
5. Boonekamp, P. G. M. 2006. Actual interaction effects between policy measures for energy efficiency - A qualitative matrix ethod and quantitative simulation results for households. Energy 31:2848-2873.
6. Boots, M. G., Schaeffer, G., and de Zoeten, C. 2001. The interaction of tradable instruments in renewable energy and limate change markets. ECN-C-01-048, Petten, the Netherlands: Energy Research Center of the Netherlands.
7. Bovenberg, A. L., and de Mooij, R. A. 1994. Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:1085-089.
8. Bye, T., and Bruvoll, A. 2008. Multiple instruments to change energy behaviour: The emperor's new clothes? Energy fficiency 1:373-386.
9. Fischer, C. 2003. Combining rate-based and cap-and-trade emissions policies. Clim. Policy 3S2:89-103.
10. Flamos, A., Georgallis, P. G., Doukas, H., and Psarras J. 2009. Policy oriented review for photovoltaics introduction in he EU. Int. J. Renew. Energ. Technol. 1:64-80.
11. Fullerton, D., and Wolverton, A. 1997. The case for a two-part instrument: Presumptive tax and environmental subsidy. In: Invironmental and Public Economics: Essays in Honor of Wallace E. Oates, Panagaria, A., Portney, P., and Schwab,R. (Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Edward Elgar.
12. Grafakos, S., Flamos, A., Oikonomou, V., and Zevgolis, D. 2010. Multi-criteria analysis weighting methodology to ncorporate stakeholders' preferences in energy and climate policy interactions. Int. J. Energ. Sec. Manage. 4:434-461.
13. Hoeller, P., and Coppel, J. 1992. Energy taxation and price distortions in fossil-fuel markets: Some implications for climate hange policy. In: Climate Change-Designing a Practical Tax System. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation nd Development.
14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working roup III to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
15. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007, Mitigation. Contribution of Working roup III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: PCC.
16. Jensen, S. G., and Skytte, K., 2002. Interactions between the power and green certificate markets. Energ. Policy 30:425-435. (Pubitemid 34290680)
17. Konidari, P., and Mavrakis, D. 2007. A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments. Energ. Policy 35:6235-6257. (Pubitemid 350028936)
18. Langniss, O., and Klink, J. 2006.White certificate schemes and (national) green certificate schemes. EIE/04/123/S07.38640, prepared for the "EuroWhiteCert project" for European Commission Intelligent Energy Programme.
19. Meijers, E., and Stead, D. 2004. Policy integration: What does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary eview. Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of policies - Interlinkages nd Policy Integration, Berlin, December 4.
20. Meran, G., and Wittmann, N. 2008. Green, Brown, and Now White Certificates: Are Three One Too Many? A Micromodel f Market Interaction. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
21. Morthorst, P. E. 2001. Interactions of a tradable green certificate market with a tradable permits market. Energ. Policy 2:345-353.
22. Oikonomou, V., and Jepma, C. 2008. A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments. Mitigationand Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 13: 131-156. (Pubitemid 350197880)
23. Oikonomou, V., Flamos, A., and Grafakos, S. 2010. Is blending of energy and climate policy instruments for the end users lways desirable? Energ. Policy 38:4186-4195.
24. Oikonomou, V., Flamos, A., Gargiulo, M., Giannakidis, G., Kanudia, A., Spijker, E., and Grafakos, S. 2011. Linking east-cost energy system costs models with MCA: An assessment of the EU Renewable Energy targets and supporting olicies. Energ. Policy 39:2786-2799.
25. Oikonomou, V., Flamos, A., Spijker, E., Spyridaki, N.-A., and van der Gaast, W. 2012a. Domestic offset projects, in the built environment. Energy Efficiency 5:335-350.
26. Oikonomou, V., Flamos, A., Zeugolis, D., and Grafakos, S. 2012b. A qualitative assessment of EU energy policy interactions. Energ. Source. B 7:177-187.
27. Oikonomou V., Zevgolis D., and Grafakos, S. 2008. Methods of integrating policy instruments. Energy and Climate Policy Interactions (ECPI) Decision Support Tool, EDREC Discussion Paper. Groningen, the Netherlands: University of Groningen.
28. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). 1997. Evaluating economic instruments for environmental policy. In: Smith, S., and Vos, H. B. (Eds.). Paris: OECD.
29. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). 2003. The use of tradable permits in combination with other environmental policy instruments. Paris: OECD.
30. Perrels, A., Oranen, A., and Rajala, R., 2006. White Certificates and interactions with other policy instruments. EIE/04/123/S07.38640, prepared for the "EuroWhiteCert project." European Commission Intelligent Energy Programme.
31. Peters, G., and van Nispen, F. 1998. Public Policy Instruments. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
32. Smith, S. 1999. The compatibility of tradable permits with other environmental policy instruments, Implementing domestic tradable permits for environmental protection. Paris: OECD.
33. Sorrell, S. 2003. Interaction in EU Climate Policy INTERACT project. Project No. EVK2-CT-2000-0067. EU Commission.
34. Sorrell, S., Harrisson, D., Radov, D., Klevnas, P., and Foss, A. 2009. White certificiate schemes: Economic analysis and interactions with the EU ETS. Energ. Policy 37:29-42.
35. Van der Gaast, W., Oikonomou,V., and Flamos, A. 2013. Domestic offsets in practice: Modalities and implications. Energ. Source. B 8:144-153.