A new approach to influence diagrams evaluation

Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVI: Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XVII

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 107-120

  Marinescu, Radu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY; EXPECTED UTILITY; GRAPHICAL MODEL; INFLUENCE DIAGRAM; NEW APPROACHES; REDUNDANT COMPUTATION; SEARCH SPACES;

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84882288811     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-983-1_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Cooper, G. : A method for using belief networks as influence diagrams. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pp. 55-63 (1988)
2. Dechter, R. : A new perspective on algorithms for optimizing policies under uncertainty. In: Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling Systems (AIPS), pp. 72-81 (2000)
3. Dechter, R.,Mateescu, R. : AND/OR search spaces for graphical models. Artificial Intelligence 171(2-3), 73-106 (2007)
4. Howard, R. A., Matheson, J. E. : Influence diagrams. The principles and applications of Decision analyis. Menlo Park, CA, USA (1984)
5. Jensen, F., Jensen, F., Dittmer, S. : From influence diagrams to junction trees. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pp. 367-373 (1994)
6. Lauritzen, S., Nilsson, D. : Representing and solving decision problems with limited information. Mngmnt. Science 47(9), 1235-1251 (2001)
7. Marinescu, R., Dechter, R. : AND/OR branch-and-bound for graphical models. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 224-229 (2005)
8. Mateescu, R., Dechter, R. : AND/OR cutset conditioning. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 230-235 (2005)
9. Pearl, J. : Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann (1988)
10. Pralet, C., Verfaillie, G., Schiex, T. : An algebraic graphical model for decision with uncertainties, feasibilities, and utilities. JAIR 29(1), 421-489 (2007)
11. Qi, R., Poole, D. : A new method for influence diagram evaluation. Computational Intelligence 11, 498-528 (1995)
12. Shenoy, P. : Valuation-based systems for Bayesian decision analysis. Operations Research 40(3), 463-484 (1992)
13. Tatman, J., Shachter, R. : Dynamic programming and influence diagrams. IEEE Systems,Man, and Cybernetics (1990)
14. Walsh, T. : SAT vs CSP. In: Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP), pp. 441-456 (2000)