The roles of intermediaries in sectoral innovation system in developing countries: Public organizations versus private organizations

Asian Journal of Technology Innovation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 108-119

  Intarakumnerd, P ^a   Chaoroenporn, P ^b  

^a NATIONAL GRADUATE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES   (Japan)

^b THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

innovation intermediaries; organization set up; public versus private; sectoral innovation system

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882278755     PISSN: 19761597     EISSN: 21586721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19761597.2013.810949     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Berger, M. (2005), 'Upgrading the System of Innovation in Late-Industrializing Countries - The Role of Transnational Corporations in Thailand's Manufacturing Sector', Dissertation Kiel University, Germany.
2. Bessant, J. and Rush, H. 1995. Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy, 24 (1): 97 - 114. (doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E)
3. Brooker Group. (2002), 'International Competitiveness of Asian Economies - A Cross-Country Study - Thailand Paper', Report for Asian Development Bank.
4. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M. and Rickne, A. 2002. Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31 (2): 233 - 245. (doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X)
5. Dodgson, M. and Bessant, J. 1996. Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach, London: International Thomson Business Press.
6. Goto, A. 1997. " Cooperative research in Japanese manufacturing industries ". In Innovation in Japan, Edited by: Goto, A. and Odagiri, H. 256 - 274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Howard Partners. (2007), 'Study of the Role of Intermediaries in Support of Innovation,' A Report submitted to Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Canberra, Australia.
8. Howells, J. 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35: 715 - 728. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005)
9. Huggins, R. 2001. Inter-firm network policies and firm performance: evaluating the impact of initiatives in the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 30: 443 - 458. (doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00092-5)
10. Intarakumnerd, P., and Virasa, T. (2002), 'Broader Roles of RTOs in Developing Countries: From Knowledge Creators to Strengtheners of National Innovation System', Paper presented at Science, Technology and Innovation Conference, JFK School of government, Harvard University, September 23-24.
11. Intarakumnerd, P., Chatratana, S., Jirathumkitkul, Pand T., and Smitinont, T. (2010), 'Successes and Failures of an Intermediary in Triple Helix Relationships in Developing Economy: The Case of Thailand's Food industry', Paper presented in the VIII Triple Helix International Conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages. Madrid, October 20-22.
12. Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. 2008. Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technovation, 28 (6): 364 - 378. (doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.005)
13. Kohpaiboon, A. (2006), 'Global Integration and Thai Automotive Industry', Discussion Paper No. 16, Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University, Bangkok (available for downloading at ww.econ.tu.ac.th/Research/Discussion paper)
14. Kolodny, H., Stymne, B., Shani, R., figuera, J. R. and Lillrank, P. 2001. Design and policy choices for technology extension organisations. Research Policy, 30 (2): 201 - 225. (doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00119-5)
15. Lynn, L., Reddy, N. and Aram, J. 1996. Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework. Research Policy, 25: 91 - 106. (doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00817-5)
16. Malerba, B. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31 (2002): 247 - 264. (doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1)
17. North, D. and Smallbone, D. 2006. Developing entrepreneurship and enterprise in Europe's peripheral rural areas: some issues facing policy-makers. European Planning Studies, 14 (1): 41 - 60. (doi:10.1080/09654310500339125)
18. Rosenfeld, S. A. 1996. Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration. Research Policy, 25: 247 - 263. (doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00835-7)
19. Senker, J., and Faulkner, W. (2001), 'Origins of public-private knowledge flows and current state-of-the art: can agriculture learn from industry?', in Institutional Innovation in Agriculture, eds. S.A. Wolf, and D. Zilbermann, Knowledge Generation and Technical Change, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 203-232.
20. Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S. 2004. The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1 (1/2): 4 - 30. (doi:10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621)
21. Stankiewicz, R. 1995. " The role of the science and technology infrastructure in the development and diffusion of industrial automation in Sweden ". In Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation, Edited by: Carlsson, B. 165 - 210. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. Techakanont, K. and Terdudomtham, T. 2004. Evolution of inter-firm technology transfer and technological capability formation of local parts firms in the Thai automobile industry. Journal of Technology and Innovation, 12: 151 - 183. (doi:10.1080/19761597.2004.9668602)
23. Van der Meulen, B., Nedeva, M., and Braun, D. (2005), 'Intermediaries Organisation and Processes: Theory and Research Issues,' Position Paper for the PRIME Workshop, Enschede, the Netherlands, October 6-7.