Querying business process models with VMQL

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Störrle, Harald ^a   Acretoaie, Vlad ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

BPMN; Model querying; Model repositories; OCL; UML; VMQL

Indexed keywords

BPMN; MODEL REPOSITORIES; OCL; UML; VMQL;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

QUERY LANGUAGES;

EID: 84882274556     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2492437.2492441     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. D. H. Akehurst and B. Bordbar. On Querying UML Data Models with OCL. In M. Gogolla and C. Kobryn, editors, Proc. 4th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML'01), volume 2185 of LNCS, pages 91{103. Springer, 2001.
2. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Including 2010 Amendments, 2012.
3. A. Awad and S. Sakr. On efficient processing of BPMN-Q queries. Comp. Ind., 63(9):867{881, 2012.
4. A. Awad, M. Weidlich, and M. Weske. Visually specifying compliance rules and explaining their violations for business processes. J. Vis. Lang. Comput., 22(1):30{55, Feb. 2011.
5. C. Beeri, A. Eyal, S. Kamenkovich, and T. Milo. Querying business processes with BP-QL. Inf. Syst., 33(6):477{507, Sept. 2008.
6. I. Choi, K. Kim, and M. Jang. An XML-Based Process Repository and Process Query Language for Integrated Process Management. Knowledge and Process Management, 14(4):303{316, 2007.
7. C. DiFrancescomarino and P. Tonella. Crosscutting Concern Documentation by Visual Query of Business Processes. In D. Ardagna, M. Mecella, and J. Yang, editors, Business Process Management Workshops, volume 17 of LNBIP, pages 18{31. Springer, 2009.
8. R. Dijkman, M. L. Rosa, and H. A. Reijers. Editorial: Managing large collections of business process models-Current techniques and challenges. Comput. Ind., 63(2):91{97, Feb. 2012.
9. E. A. Emerson and J. Y. Halpern. Decision procedures and expressiveness in the temporal logic of branching time. J. Comp. Syst. Sci., 30:1{24, 1985.
10. D. Gopher and R. Braune. On the psychophysics of workload: Why bother with subjective measures? Human Factors, 26(5):519{532, 1984.
11. T. Jin, J. Wang, and L. Wen. Querying Business Process Models Based on Semantics. In J. X. Yu, M. H. Kim, and R. Unland, editors, Proc. 16th international conference on Database systems for advanced applications (DASFAA'11): Part II, volume 6588 of LNCS, pages 164{178. Springer, 2011.
12. S. Kent. Constraint Diagrams: Visualizing Invariants in Object-Oriented Models. In Proc. 12th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA'97, pages 327{341. ACM, 1997.
13. L. Mandel and M. V. Cengarle. On the Expressive Power of OCL. In J. M. Wing, J. Woodcock, and J. Davies, editors, Proc. World Congress on Formal Methods in the Development of Computing Systems (FM'99), volume 1708 of LNCS, pages 854{874. Springer, September 1999.
14. M. Momotko and K. Subieta. Process Query Language: A Way to Make Workow Processes More Flexible. In A. Benczur, J. Demetrovics, and G. Gottlob, editors, Proc. 8th East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS'04), volume 3255 of LNCS, pages 306{321. Springer, 2004.
15. J. Müller. A Rule-Based Approach to Match Structural Patterns with Business Process Models. In G. Governatori, J. Hall, and A. Paschke, editors, Proc. 3rd International Symposium on Rules, Applications and Interoperability (RuleML'09), volume 5858 of LNCS, pages 208{215. Springer, 2009.
16. Object Management Group (OMG). Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification, Version 1.1, 2011.
17. OMG. OCL Specification v2.3.1 (formal/2012-01-01). Technical report, Object Management Group, Jan. 2012.
18. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS). Web Services Business Process Execution Language, Version 2.0, 2007.
19. F. Paas, J. E. Tuovinen, H. Tabbers, and P. W. Van Gerven. Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1):63{71, 2003.
20. D. Stein, S. Hanenberg, and R. Unland. Query Models. In T. Baar, A. Strohmeier, A. Moreira, and S. J. Mellor, editors, Proc. 7th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML'04), volume 3273 of LNCS, pages 98{112. Springer, 2004.
21. D. Stein, S. Hanenberg, and R. Unland. Join Point Designation Diagrams: A Graphical Representation Of Join Point Selections. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng., 16(3):317{346, June 2006.
22. H. Störrle. VMQL: A Generic Visual Model Query Language. In M. Erwig, R. DeLine, and M. Minas, editors, Proc. IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC'09), pages 199{206. IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
23. H. Störrle. Expressing Model Constraints Visually with VMQL. In G. Costagliola et al., editor, Proc. IEEE Symp. Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC'11), pages 195{202. IEEE Computer Society, 2011.
24. H. Störrle. VMQL: A Visual Language for Ad-Hoc Model Querying. J. Visual Languages and Computing, 22(1):3{29, Feb. 2011.
25. V. Stricker, S. Hanenberg, and D. Stein. Designing Design Constraints in the UML Using Join Point Designation Diagrams. In M. Oriol and B. Meyer, editors, Proc. 47th International Conference TOOLS Europe (TOOLS'09), volume 33 of LNBIP, pages 57{76. Springer, 2009.
26. The Workow Management Coalition. Process Definition Interface - XML Process Definition Language, Version 2.2, 2012.
27. J. Whittle and P. Jayaraman. MATA: A Tool for Aspect-Oriented Modeling Based on Graph Transformation. In H. Giese, editor, Models in Software Engineering - Proc. Workshops and Symposia at MoDELS 2007, volume 5002 of LNCS, pages 16{27. Springer, 2008.
28. Z. Yan, R. Dijkman, and P. Grefen. FNet: An Index for Advanced Business Process Querying. In A. Barros, A. Gal, and E. Kindler, editors, Proc. 10th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM'12), volume 7481 of LNCS, pages 246{261. Springer, 2012.