Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on vital bone formation and implant survival: A retrospective study

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1094-1099

  Froum, Stuart J ^a   Khouly, Ismael ^b   Favero, Giovanni ^c,d   Cho, Sang Choon ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Bone grafting; Dental implant; Histology; Sinus floor augmentation

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; HYDROXYAPATITE; HYDROXYAPATITE BETA TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; HYDROXYAPATITE-BETA TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE;

AGED; ALLOGRAFT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MATRIX; BONE PROSTHESIS; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INJURY; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE MUCOSA; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SURVIVAL; TOOTH IMPLANT; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; AGED; ALLOGRAFTS; ANIMALS; BONE MATRIX; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CATTLE; COLLAGEN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROXYAPATITES; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL MUCOSA; OSTEOGENESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84882271025     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.120458     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-343.
2. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-577.
3. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(Suppl.):49-70.
4. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75:511-516.
5. Barone A, Santini S, Sbordone L, Crespi R, Covani U. A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:81-85.
6. Zijderveld SA, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66: 1426-1438.
7. Anavi Y, Allon DM, Avishai G, Calderon S. Complications of maxillary sinus augmentations in a selective series of patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:34-38.
8. Cho SC, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Tarnow DP. Influence of anatomy on Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus elevation surgery: Three-dimensional analysis. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001;13:160-163.
9. Misch CE. Maxillary sinus lift and elevation with subcentral augmentation. Contemp Implant Dent 1993;25: 545-574.
10. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Oliver AJ. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: Results in 98 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:210-216, discussion 216-218.
11. Kasabah S, Krug J, Simůnek A, Lecaro MC. Can we predict maxillary sinus mucosa perforation? Acta Med (Hradec Kralove) 2003;46:19-23.
12. Froum SJ, Wallace SS, Cho SC, Elian N, Tarnow DP. Histomorphometric comparison of a biphasic bone ceramic to anorganic bovine bone for sinus augmentation: 6-to 8-month postsurgical assessment of vital bone formation. A pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:273-281.
13. Froum SJ, Wallace SS, Elian N, Cho SC, Tarnow DP. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:543-551.
14. Hernández-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:91-98.
15. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(Suppl.):11-45.
16. Proussaefs P, Lozada JL, Kim J, Rohrer MD. Repair of the perforated sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane: A human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:413-420.
17. Khoury F. Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: A 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:557-564.
18. Becker ST, Terheyden H, Steinriede A, Behrens E, Springer I, Wiltfang J. Prospective observation of 41 perforations of the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 1285-1289.
19. Shlomi B, Horowitz I, Kahn A, Dobriyan A, Chaushu G. The effect of sinus membrane perforation and repair with Lambone on the outcome of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A radiographic assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:559-562.
20. Testori T, Wallace SS, Del Fabbro M, et al. Repair of large sinus membrane perforations using stabilized collagen barrier membranes: Surgical techniques with histologic and radiographic evidence of success. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:9-17.
21. Ardekian L, Oved-Peleg E, Mactei EE, Peled M. The clinical significance of sinus membrane perforation during augmentation of the maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:277-282.
22. Karabuda C, Arisan V, Özyuvaci H. Effects of sinus membrane perforations on the success of dental implants placed in the augmented sinus. J Periodontol 2006;77:1991-1997.