Comparison of regenerated and non-regenerated oxidized cellulose hemostatic agents

European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 213-220

  Lewis, K M ^a   Spazierer, D ^b   Urban, M D ^a   Lin, L ^a   Redl, H ^c   Goppelt, A ^b  

^a BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b BAXTER INNOVATIONS GMBH   (Austria)

^c LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRAUMATOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cellulose; Celstat; Fibrin pad; Hemostasis; Liver abrasion; Liver square; Oxidized cellulose; Surgicel; Traumastem

Indexed keywords

HEMOSTATIC AGENT; OXIDIZED CELLULOSE; OXIDIZED NONREGENERATED CELLULOSE; OXIDIZED REGENERATED CELLULOSE; PHOSPHATE BUFFERED SALINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACIDITY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIBER; GENERAL SURGERY; HEMOSTASIS; HEPARINIZATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; LIVER INJURY; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PH; PLASMA; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SWINE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VASCULAR SURGERY;

EID: 84882270134     PISSN: 16828631     EISSN: 16824016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10353-013-0222-z     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Spotnitz WD, Burks SG. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives II: update as well as how and when to use the components of the surgical toolbox. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2010;16:497-514.
2. Frantz VK, Lattes R. Oxidized cellulose-absorbable gauze (cellulosic acid). JAMA. 1945;129:798-801.
3. ®: its fate following implantation. J Oral Pathol. 1984;13(6):661-70.
4. Miller JM, Jackson DA, Collier CS. An investigation of the chemical reactions of oxidized regenerated cellulose. Exp Med Surgery. 1961;19:196.
5. Dimitrijevich SD, Tatarko M, Gracy RW. Biodegradation of oxidized regenerated cellulose. Carbohydr Res. 1990;195:247-56.
6. Dimitrijevich SD, Tatarko M, Gracy RW, Wise GE. Oakford LX. In vivo degradation of oxidized, regenerated cellulose. Carbohydr Res. 1990;198:331-41.
7. Dineen P. The effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose on experimental infected splenotomies. J Surg Res. 1977;23:114-6.
8. Abaev Y, Kaputsky V, Adarchenko A, Sobeshchuk O. Mechanism of antibacterial effects of monocarboxyl cellulose and other ion exchange derivatives of cellulose. Antibiot Med Bioteckhnol. 1986;31:624-8.
9. Spangler D, Rothenburger S, Nguyen K, Jampani H, Weiss S. Bhende S. In vitro antimicrobial activity of oxidized regenerated cellulose against antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Surg Infect. 2003;4:255-62.
10. Adams G, Manson J, Hasselblad V, Shaw LK, Lawson JH. Acute in-vivo evaluation of bleeding with GelfoamTM plus saline and GelfoamTM plus human thrombin using a liver square lesion model in swine. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009;28:1-5.
11. Thornton JA. Estimation of blood loss during surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1963;33:164-74.
12. Ribalta T, McCutcheon IE, Neto AG, Gupta D, Kumar AJ, Biddle DA, Langford LA, Bruner JM, Leeds NE, Fuller G. Textiloma (Gossypiboma) mimicking recurrent intracranial tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:749-58.
13. Kheirabadi BS, Arnaud F, McCarron R, Murdock AD, Hodge DL, Ritter B, Dubick MA, Blackbourne LH. Development of a standard swine hemorrhage model for efficacy assessment of topical hemostatic agents. J Trauma. 2011;71(1 Suppl):S139-46.
14. Mabry CD, Thompson BW, Read RC. Activated clotting time (ACT) monitoring of intraoperative heparinization in peripheral vascular surgery. Am J Surg. 1979;138(6):894-900.
15. Vytrasova J, Tylsova A, Brozkova I, Cervenka L, Pejchalova M, Havelka P. Antimicrobial effect of oxidized cellulose salts. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35:1247-52.