The value of quantitative real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease

Clinical Cardiology

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 468-474

  Li, Dong Ye ^a   Liang, Li ^a   Xu, Tong Da ^a   Zhang, Hui ^a   Pan, De Feng ^a   Chen, Jun Hong ^a   Chen, Jing ^a   Wang, Xiao Ping ^a  

^a XUZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EPICARDIUM; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GATED SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEART MUSCLE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; PERICARDIUM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REST; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THORAX PAIN;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; CARDIAC-GATED SINGLE-PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER-ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84882249747     PISSN: 01609289     EISSN: 19328737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clc.22142     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bonow RO, Maurer G, Lee KL, et al. Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1617-1625.
2. Porter TR, Xie F, Silver M, et al. Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 748-753.
3. Villanueva FS, Wagner WR,. Ultrasound molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008; 5 (suppl): S26-S32.
4. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation. 1998; 97: 473-483.
5. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 252-260.
6. Masugata H, Peters B, Lafitte S, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 262-269.
7. Masugata H, Lafitte S, Peters B, et al. Comparison of real-time and intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography for quantification of coronary stenosis severity and transmural perfusion gradient. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1550-1556.
8. Leong-Poi H, Le E, Rim SJ, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion and determination of coronary stenosis severity during hyperemia using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001; 14: 1173-1182.
9. Van Camp G, Ay T, Pasquet A, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and assessment of its transmural distribution with real-time power modulation myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003; 16: 263-270.
10. Galiuto L, Garramone B, Burzotta F, et al. Thrombus aspiration reduces microvascular obstruction after primary coronary intervention: a myocardial contrast echocardiography substudy of the REMEDIA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 1355-1360.
11. Von Bibra H, Bone D, Niklasson U, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography yields best accuracy using quantitative analysis of digital data from pulse inversion technique: comparison with second harmonic imaging and harmonic power Doppler during simultaneous dipyridamole stress SPECT studies. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2002; 3: 271-282.
12. Xie F, Hankins J, Mahrous HA, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with a continuous infusion of definity ultrasound contrast during adenosine stress real time perfusion echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2007; 24: 1044-1050.
13. Wei K, Ragosta M, Thorpe J, et al. Noninvasive quantification of coronary blood flow reserve in humans using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2560-2565.
14. Dawson D, Rinkevich D, Belcik T, et al. Measurement of myocardial blood flow velocity reserve with myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison with quantitative gated technetium 99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003; 16: 1171-1177.
15. Hacker M, Hoyer HX, Uebleis C, et al. Quantitative assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with conventional echocardiographic analyses and [Tc99m]-sestamibi SPECT. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008; 9: 494-500.
16. Senior R, Kaul S, Soman P, et al. Power Doppler harmonic imaging: a feasibility study of a new technique for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Am Heart J. 2000; 139: 245-251.
17. Lin SL, Chiou KR, Huang WC, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with dual-isotope resting thallium-201/stress technectium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Heart Vessels. 2006; 21: 226-235.
18. Shimoni S, Zoghbi WA, Xie F, et al. Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 741-747.
19. Wei K, Crouse L, Weiss J, et al. Comparison of usefulness of dipyridamole stress myocardial contrast echocardiography to technetium99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of coronary artery disease (PB127 multicenter phase 2 trial results). Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 1293-1298.
20. Spencer KT, Grayburn PA, Mor-Avi V, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography with power Doppler imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 479-481.
21. Ishikura F, Otani K, Kayano H, et al. Quantitative assessment of microcollateral recruitment during coronary occlusion using real-time intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21: 139-145.
22. Tiemann K, Lohmeier S, Kuntz S, et al. Real-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: first experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging. Echocardiography. 1999; 16: 799-809.
23. Reant P, Labrousse L, Lafitte S, et al. Quantitative analysis of function and perfusion during dobutamine stress in the detection of coronary stenoses: two-dimensional strain and contrast echocardiography investigations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010; 23: 95-103.
24. Senior R, Lepper W, Pasquet A, et al. Myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with medium probability of coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction: comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with 99mTc single-photon emission computed tomography. Am Heart J. 2004; 147: 1100-1105.
25. Peltier M, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, et al. Assessment of the physiologic significance of coronary disease with dipyridamole real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 257-264.
26. Saranteas T, Alevizou A, Tzoufi M, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of left ventricular thrombosis in the postoperative care unit. Crit Care. 2011; 15: R54.
27. Platts D, Fraser JF,. Contrast echocardiography in critical care: echoes of the future? A review of the role of microsphere contrast echocardiography. Crit Care Resusc. 2011; 13: 44-55.