Computerized technology for restorative dentistry

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 115-120

  Fasbinder, Dennis J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER; DENTAL SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

COMPUTERS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT;

EID: 84882241096     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: An overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-511.
2. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: Innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31(Sp Is 4):2-11.
3. Mormann, WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:7s-13s. (Pubitemid 44483922)
4. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D scanners: Virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:494-505.
5. Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ. Dentistry a la carte: In-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010;38:323-330.
6. Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: The end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008;19:1-4.
7. Fasbinder DJ. Using digital technology to enhance dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012;23:2-9.
8. Poticny D, Fasbinder DJ. Accuracy of digital model articulation J Dent Res 2011;90(Sp Is A): Abstr 131.
9. Patzelt SBM, Lamprinos C, Strub JR, Att W. The efficacy of different intraoral scanners. J Dent Res 2013;92(Sp Is A): Abstr 464.
10. Givan DA, Burgess JO, O'Neal SJ, Aponte AA. Prospective evaluation of ceramic crowns by digital and conventional impressions. J Dent Res 2011;90(SpIsA):Abstr 380.
11. Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF, Dennison JB, Heys D, Heys R. Evaluation of zirconia crowns made from conventional and digital impressions. J Dent Res 2012;91(Sp Is A): Abstr 644.
12. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131:107-111.
13. Ogledzki M, Wenzel K, Doherty E, Kugel G. Accuracy of 3M-Brontes stereolithography models compared to plaster models. J Dent Res 2010;89(Sp Is A): Abstr 1060.
14. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impresssions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-559.
15. Ellingsen LA, Fasbinder DJ. In vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 2002;81 (Sp Is A):Abstr 2640.
16. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007 35:68-73. (Pubitemid 44881178)
17. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:244-248. (Pubitemid 37141313)
18. Renne W, McGill ST, VanSickle Forshee K, DeFee MR, Mennito AS. Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence of or absence of common preparation errors. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:310-315.
19. Plourde J, Harsono M, Fox L, Hill TJ, Finkelman M, Kugel G. Marginal and internal fit of E4D CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 2011;90(SpIsA):Abstr 638.
20. Cardelli P, Scotti R, Monaco C. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2011; doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.0005.
21. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2012; doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4.
22. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow. Comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013; doi: 10. 1007/s00784-013-0923-5.