The lockerbie cases

International and Comparative Law Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 658-663

  Beveridge, Fiona ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882174408     PISSN: 00205893     EISSN: 14716895     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0020589300063491     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom), Judgement, ICJ Rep. 1998, 9
2. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United States of America, ICJ Rep. 1998, 115.
3. For an account of the events in question see F. Beveridge, “The Lockerbie Affair” (1992) 41 I.C.L.Q. 907.
4. Oral Pleadings of the UK, para.3.45.
5. Judgment, para.21.
6. CR 97/22, para.2.4.
7. South West Africa, Preliminary Objections, judgment, l.CJ. Rep. 1962, 328.
8. Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria Hungary and Romania, First Phase, advisory opinion, I.C.J. Rep. 1950, 74.
9. Judgment, para.22.
10. Idem, para.29.
11. Idem, para.38.
12. The Court referred to the Nottebohm Case, Preliminary Objection, judgment, I.C.J. Rep. 1953, 122
13. Right of Passage over Indian Territory, Preliminary Objections, judgment, l.CJ. Rep. 1957, 142.
14. By 13 votes to 3 in the case against the UK; 13 to 2 in that against the US: judgment, para. 53.
15. CR 97/17, para.5.3.
16. By 12 votes to 4 in the case against the UK; 12 to 3 in that against the US: judgment, paras.44 and 53.
17. CR 97/19, para.3.86. Similar arguments were advanced by the UK.
18. Judgment, para.42.
19. CR 97/17 para.4.
20. Judgment para.50
21. citing Barcelona, Traction, Light and Power Co. Ltd, Preliminary Objections, judgment, I.CJ. Rep. 1964, 46.
22. Judgment in the instant case was given by 10 votes to 6 in the case against the UK; m that against the US: judgment, para.53.
23. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United Slates), Preliminary Objections, I.CJ. Rep. 1996, para.16.