Localized technological progress and industry structure: An empirical approach

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 121-146

  Cantner, Uwe ^a   Westermann, Georg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Industry structure; Localized technological progress; Technological heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881989903     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438599800000017     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ali A.I. and C.S. Lerme (1990) Data Envelopment Analysis Models: a Framework, Working Paper, School of Management, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
2. Andersen, P., and Petersen, N.C., 1989. A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Dep, of Management, Odense University, II
3. Antonelli, C., 1994. “ Localized Technological Changes: A Model Incorporating Switching Costs and R&D Expenses with Endowment Advantages ”. In Innovation in Technology, Industries. and Institutions, Edited by: Shionoya, Y., and Perlman, M., 75–87. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. 1994
4. Antonelli, C., 1995. “ The Economics of Localized Technological Change ”. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Atkinson, A.B., and Stiglitz, J.E., 1969. A New View of Technological Change. Economic Journal, 79: 573–578.
6. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30: 1078–1092.
7. Bernard J., U. Cantner, H. Hanusch and G. Westermann (1994) Technology and Efficiency Patterns - A Comparative Study on Selected Sectors from the French and German Industry, working paper #121, University of Augsburg.
8. Bernard, J., Cantner, U., Hanusch, H., and Westermann, G., 1995. “ R&D, productivit[e] et rentabilit[e]: analyse empirique doene relation complexe ”. In Technologie et performances economiques, Edited by: Haudeville, B., H[e]raud, J.A., and Humbert, M., 355–390. Paris: Economica. 1995
9. Bernard, J., Cantner, U., and Westermann, G., 1996. Technological Leadership and Variety - A Data Envelopment Analysis for the French Machinery Industry. Annals of Operations Research, 68: 361–377.
10. Böhm, K., 1978. Lineare Quotienten programing Rentabilil[a]lsoptimierung, Frankfurt a.M.: Haag + Herchen Verlag.
11. Cantner U., (1995) Technological Dynamics in Asymmetric Industries, University of Augsburg, working paper #143
12. Cantner, U., Hanusch, H., and Westermann, G., 1996. “ Detecting Technological Performance and Variety -An Empirical Approach ”. In Behavioural Norms, Technological Progress and Economic Dynamics: Studies in Schumpeterian Economics, Edited by: Helmst[a]dter, E., and Perlman, M., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. forthcoming in 1996
13. Caves, R.E., and Barton, D.R., 1990. Efficiency in U.S. Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., 1962. Programming with Linear Fractional Functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9: 181–186.
15. Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., 1984. The Non-Archimedean CCR Ratio for Efficiency Analysis: A Rejoinder to Boyd and F[a]re. European Journal of Operational Research, 15: 333–334.
16. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429
17. Cohen, W., and Levinthal, D., 1989. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99: 569–596.
18. David, P., 1975. “ Technical Choice ”. In lnnovation and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Day, D., Lewin, A.Y., Li, H., and Salazar, R., 1994. “ Strategic leaders in the Us Brewing Industry: A Longitudinal Analysis of Outliers ”. In Date Envelopment Analysis - Theory, Methodology and Applications Edited by: Chames, A, Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., and Seiford, L.M., 211–234. 1994
20. Dosi, G., 1988. “ The Nature of the Innovative Process ”. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, Edited by: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R, Silverberg, G., and Soete, L., 221–238. London, New York: Pinter Publishers. 1988
21. Farrell, M.J., 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120: 253–281. Series A
22. Freeman, C., and Soete, L., “ Factor Substitution and Technical Change ”. In Technical Change and Full Employment, Edited by: Freeman, C., and Soete, L., 36–48. London: Basil Blackwell. 1987
23. Kendrick, J.W., 1956. Productivity Trends: Capital and Labor. Review of Economics and Statistics, 38: 248–257.
24. Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S., 1962. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press.
25. Ott, A.E., 1959. “ Technischer Fortschritt ”. In Handw[o]rterbuch der Sozialwissenschaften. Bd.10, 302–316. Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag.
26. Stiglitz, J.E., 1987. “ Learning to Learn, Localized Learning and Technological Progress ”. In Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Edited by: Dasgupta, P., and Stoneman, P., Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
27. Thore, S., 1996. Economies of Scale in thc U.S. Computer Industry: An Empirical Investigation Using Data envelopment Analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6: 199–216.
28. Verspagen, B., 1990. “ Localized Technological Change, Factor Substitution and the Productivity Slowdown ”. In New Explorations in the Economics of Technological Change, Edited by: Freeman, C., and Soete, L., 193–211. London, New York: Pinter Publishers.