Biofuels subsidies and the green box

Agricultural Subsidies in the WTO Green Box: Ensuring Coherence with Sustainable Development Goals

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 530-568

  Josling, Timothy ^a   Blandford, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881974280     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511674587.019     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Blandford, David and Josling, Tim (2007), “Should the Green Box be Modified?”, IPC Discussion Paper, Washington, DC.
2. Blandford, David and Orden, David (2008), “Shadow Domestic Farm Support Notifications for the United States”, IFPRI project paper.
3. de Gorter, H. and Just, D. R. (2007), “The Law of Unintended Consequences: How the U.S. Biofuel Tax Credit with a Mandate Subsidizes Oil Consumption and Has No Impact on Ethanol Consumption”, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Working Paper 2007–20, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=1024525.
4. G-20 (2005), “Review and Clarification of Green Box Criteria”, 6 February, http://www.g-20.mre.gov.br/conteudo/19082005Breviario.pdf.
5. Hebebrand, Charlotte and Laney, Kara (2007), “An Examination of U.S. and EU Government Support to Biofuels: Early Lessons”, IPC Issue Brief 26, October.
6. Howse, R., Van Bork, P. and Hebebrand, C. (2006), “WTO Disciplines and Biofuels: Opportunities and Constraints in the Creation of a Global Marketplace”, IPC Discussion Paper, Washington DC, http://www.agritrade.org/Publications/wto biofuels.html.
7. Howse, R. P. and van Bork, P. (2006), “Options for Liberalizing Trade in Environmental Goods in the Doha Round”, ICTSD, Issue Paper 2, Geneva.
8. Josling, Tim and Swinbank, Alan (2008), “Shadow Domestic Farm Support Notifications for the European Union”, IFPRI project paper.
9. Nassar, Andre (2008), “Shadow Domestic Farm Support Notifications for Brazil”, IFPRI project paper.
10. OECD (2000), “Decoupling: A Conceptual Overview”, OECD Agricultural and Trade Directorates, COM/AGR/APM/TD/WP(2000)14/FINAL.
11. Steenblik, Ronald (2007), “Biofuels at What Cost? Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in selectedOECDcountries”, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva.
12. Swinbank, Alan and Tranter, Richard (2005), “Decoupling EU FarmSupport: Does the New Single Payment Scheme Fit within the Green Box?”, Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 6(1): 47–61.
13. WTO (1999), Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Milk and the Exportation of Dairy Products (Panel report, as modified by the Appellate Body), WT/DS/103/AB/R.
14. WTO (2001), Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, Geneva, 20 November (The Doha Declaration).
15. WTO (2003), Negotiations on Agriculture: First Draft ofModalities for the Further Commitments (Revision), TN/AG/W/1/Rev.1, 18 March.
16. WTO (2004a), Doha Work Programme: Decision Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004, WT/L/579, World Trade Organization, Geneva (the July Framework Agreement).
17. WTO (2004b), United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, Report of the Panel, WT/DS267/R (8 September).
18. WTO (2005a), United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, and WT/DS267/AB/R (adopted 21 March).
19. WTO (2005b), European Communities – Export Subsidies on Sugar, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R andWT/DS283/AB/R.
20. Yacobucci, Brent D. (2006), Fuel Ethanol: Background and Public Policy, Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, March.
21. Yacobucci, Brent and Schnepf, Randy (2007), Ethanol and Biofuels, Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, March.