Intellectual property in competition: How to promote dynamic competition as a goal

More Common Ground for International Competition Law?

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 210-229

  Drexl, Josef ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION AND COMPETITION   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881968225     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9780857938190.00022     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. J Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942, new edn 1976) at 81-6.
2. MA Heller, 'The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition of Marx to Markets' (1998) 111 Harv L Rev 621
3. MA Heller, The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation and Costs Life (2008)
4. MA Heller and R Eisenberg, 'Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research' (2008) 280 Science 5364.
5. H Ullrich, 'Patent pools - Policy and problems', in J Drexl (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2008) 139.
6. J Drexl, '"Pay for Delay" - Zur kartellrechtlichen Beurteilung streitbeilegender Vereinbarungen bei Pharma- Patenten', in D Stauder, S Abel and T Friede (eds), Sektorenuntersuchung Pharma der Europäischen Kommission - Kartellrechtliche Disziplinierung des Patentsystems? (2010) 13.
7. M- O Mackenrodt, 'Assessing the eff ects of intellectual property rights in network standards', in J Drexl (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2008) 80.
8. D Owen, 'The Betamax vs. VHS format war' (2008), http://www.mediacollege.com/video/format/compare/betamax- vhs.html (accessed December 2010).
9. J Drexl, 'Deception in the Patent World - A Case for US Antitrust and EU Competition Law?' in W Prinz zu Waldeck und Pyrmont, MJ Adelman, R Brauneis, R Drexl and R Nack (eds), Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalized World. Liber Amicorum Joseph Straus (2009) 137
10. Commission Decision of 9 December 2009, Case COMP/38.636 - Rambus, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/38636/38636_1203_1.pdf (accessed December 2010).
11. Commission Decision of 21 April 2004, Case COMP/C- 3/37.792 - Microsoft, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/37792/37792_4177_1.pdf (accessed December 2010).
12. European Commission, 'Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry Final Report' (8 July 2009) at para 1573, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/pharmaceuticals/ inquiry/staff_working_paper_part1.pdf (accessed December 2010).
13. J Drexl, 'Healing with bananas - How should Community competition law deal with restraints on parallel trade in pharmaceuticals?' in J Drexl, RM Hilty, L Boy, C Godt and B Remiche (eds), Technology and Competition - Contributions in Honour of Hanns Ullrich (2009) 571.
14. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_ docs/37507/37507_193_6.pdf (accessed December 2010).