Transnational collaboration in public research funding and publicly supported research in Europe

European Science and Technology Policy: Towards Integration or Fragmentation?

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 175-190

  Delanghe, Henri ^a   Sloan, Brian ^a   Muldur, Ugur ^a  

^a IDEA Consult ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881967388     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Adams, J., K. Gurney and S. Marshall (2007), Patterns of International Collaboration for the UK and Leading Partners (Summary Report), a report commissioned by the UK Offi ce of Science and Innovation, Leeds: Evidence Ltd.
2. Autio, E., M. Bianchi-Streit and A.-P. Hameri (2003), Technology Transfer and Technological Learning through CERN's Procurement Activity, Geneva: CERN.
3. Autio, E., A.-P. Hameri and O. Vuola (2004), 'A framework of industrial knowledge spillovers in big-science centers', Research Policy, 33, 107-26.
4. Branstetter, L.G. and M. Sakakibara (2000), 'When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data', National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper no. 7972, Cambridge, MA.
5. Busom, I. and A. Fernández-Ribas (2008), 'The impact of fi rm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships', Research Policy, 37 (2), 240-57.
6. Byckling, E., A.-P. Hameri, T. Pettersson and H. Wenninger (2000), 'Spin-off s from CERN and the case of TuoviWDM', Technovation, 20 (2), 71-80.
7. Capron, H. and M. Cincera (1999), 'The Flemish innovation system: an external viewpoint', Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT) studies no. 28, Brussels, Belgium: IWT.
8. Chang, Y.-C. (2001), 'Benefi ts of cooperation on innovative performance - empirical evidence from the UK's biomedical sector, PREST, discussion paper no. 01-08, Manchester.
9. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profi ting from Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
10. Delanghe, H. and U. Muldur (2007), 'Ex-ante impact assessment of research programmes - the experience of the European Union's 7th Framework Programme', Science and Public Policy, 34 (10), 169-83.
11. EUREKA (2006), Annual Impact Report of EUREKA 2005-2006, Brussels: EUREKA.
12. European Commission (1999), Training and Mobility of Researchers (1994-1998). Mid-term Review of the Access to Large-scale Facilities Activity. Panel's Midterm Review Report, Brussels: European Commission.
13. European Commission (2004), European Competitiveness Report 2004, Luxembourg: European Commission.
14. European Commission (2007), The Economic Research Area: New Perspectives, Green Paper, 4 June, Luxembourg.
15. Faems, D. (2006), 'Collaboration for innovation: processes of governance and learning in R&D alliances', PhD thesis at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
16. Faems, D., M. Janssens, R. Bouwen and B. Van Looy (2004), 'Explorative R&D collaboration: searching for eff ective and effi cient governance mechanisms', DTEW research report no. 0447, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
17. Faems, D., M. Janssens, R. Bouwen and B. Van Looy (2006), 'Governing explorative R&D alliances: searching for eff ective strategies', Management Revue, 17 (1), 9-29.
18. Falvey, R., J. Poyago-Theotoky and K. Teerasuwannajak (2006), 'Coordination costs: a drawback for research joint ventures?', working paper (abstract available at ssrn.com/abstract5901804, accessed 20 May 2009.)
19. Finne, T. (2003), 'R&D collaboration: the process, risks and checkpoints', Information Systems Control Journal, 2 (2003), 18-21.
20. Glänzel, W. (2001), 'National characteristics in international scientifi c co-authorship relations', Scientometrics, 51 (1), 69-115.
21. Glänzel, W., A. Schubert and H.-J. Czerwon (1999), 'A bibliometric analysis of international scientifi c cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995)', Scientometrics, 45 (2), 185-202.
22. Gómez, I., M.T. Fernández and A. Méndez (1995), 'Collaboration patterns of Spanish scientifi c publications in diff erent research areas and disciplines', in: M.E.D. Koenig and A. Bookstein (eds), Proceedings of the Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Medford, NJ, pp. 187-96.
23. Guellec, D. and M.P. Zuniga (2008), 'Globalisation of Technology Captured with Patent Data. A Preliminary Investigation at the Country Level', in: Statistics Sweden Yearbook on Productivity 2007, pp. 109-24.
24. Guellec, D. and B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2002), 'The value of patents and patenting strategies: countries and technology areas patterns', Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 11 (2), 133-48.
25. Lechevalier, S., Y. Ikeda and J. Nishimura (2008), 'The eff ect of participation in government consortia on the R&D productivity of fi rms: a case study of robot technology in Japan', The Institute of Economic Research discussion paper series a no. 500 Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.
26. Motohashi, K. (2004), 'University-industry collaboration and the importance of R&D-focused small and medium enterprises - their implications on Japan's innovation system', Keizai Sangyo Journal, 3.
27. Noteby Panel B. (2000), 'Technological innovation, industrial and socio-economic aspects of research infrastructures', Prepared for the conference and incorporating highlights of the debate in Strasbourg on 19 September.
28. Nykanem, A. and Canali, S. (2006), 'An Analysis of OFF Research Topics in CORE Organic Participating Countries Conducted', CORE Organic Project D4.1.a, p. 19.
29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD) (2002), Dynamising National Innovation Systems, Paris: OECD.
30. Offi ce of Science and Technology (1993), Economic Impacts of Hosting International Scientifi c Facilities, London: HMSO.
31. Okamuro, H. (2007), 'Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: the impact of organisational and contractual characteristics', Research Policy, 36 (10), 1529-44.
32. Sakakibara, M. (1997), 'Evaluation of government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan', in: OECD (ed.), Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology - Towards Best Practices, Paris: OECD.
33. Sakakibara, M. (2001), 'The diversity of R&D consortia and fi rm behavior: evidence from Japanese data', Journal of Industrial Economics, 49 (2), 181-96.
34. Santoro, M.D. and A.K. Chakrabarti (2002), 'Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions', Research Policy, 31 (7), 1163-80.
35. Schmied, H. (1975), A Study of Economic Utility Resulting from CERN Contracts, Geneva: CERN.
36. Schmied, H. (1977), 'A study of economic utility resulting from CERN contracts', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-24, 125-38.
37. Schmied, H. (1982), 'Results of attempts to quantify the secondary economic eff ects generated by big research centers', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29, 154-65.
38. Vuola, O. and A.-P. Hameri (2006), 'Mutually benefi ting joint innovation process between industry and big-science', Technovation, 26 (1), 3-12.