A justice- theoretic exploration of accessibility measures

Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning: Challenges for Europe and North America

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 195-210

  Martens, Karel ^a   Golub, Aaron ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881835483     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781000113.00020     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Burns, L.D., 1979. Transportation: Temporal and Spatial Components of Accessibility. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
2. Cohen, G.A., 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99, 906-944.
3. Cohen, G.A., 1993. Equality of what? On welfare, goods, and capabilities. In: Sen, A.K., Nussbaum, M.C. (eds), The Quality of Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 9-29.
4. Curtis, C., Scheurer, J., 2010. Planning for sustainable accessibility: developing tools to aid discussion and decision- making. Progress in Planning 74, 53-106.
5. Denier, Y., 2007. Effi ciency, Justice and Care: Philosophical Reflections on Scarcity in Health Care. Springer, Dordrecht.
6. Department for Transport, 2004. Guidance on accessibility planning in local transport plans. London.
7. Dong, X., Ben- Akiva, M.E., Bowman, J.L., Walker, J.L., 2006. Moving from tripbased to activity- based measures of accessibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40, 163-180.
8. Dworkin, R., 1981a. What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy and Public Aff airs 10, 185-246.
9. Dworkin, R., 1981b. What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Aff airs 10, 283-345.
10. Geurs, K.T., Ritsema van Eck, J.R., 2001. Accessibility measures: review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land- use transport scenarios, and related social and economic impacts. RIVM - National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven.
11. Geurs, K.T., Van Wee, B., 2004. Accessibility evaluation of land- use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 12, 127-140.
12. Handy, S.L., Niemeier, D.A., 1997. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A 29, 1175-1194.
13. Kwan, M.- P., 1998. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point- based framework. Geographical Analysis 30(3), 191-216.
14. Laird, J., Geurs, K., Nash, C., 2009. Option and non- use values and rail project appraisal. Transport Policy 16, 173-182.
15. Lucas, K., 2006. Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40, 801-809.
16. Lucy, W.H., 1981. Equity and planning for local services. Journal of the American Planning Association 47, 447-457.
17. Martens, K., 2012. Justice in transport as justice in access: applying Walzer's 'Spheres of Justice' to the transport sector. Transportation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9388-7(accessed 3 April 2012).
18. Martens, K., Golub, A., Robinson, G., 2012. A justice- theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefi ts: implications for transportation planning practice in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46, 684-695.
19. Martens, K., Hurvitz, E., 2011. Distributive impacts of demand- based modelling. Transportmetrica 7, 181-200.
20. Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Rosen, F. 2003. Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. London/New York, Routledge.
22. Roson, R., 2001. Assessing the option value of a publicly provided service: the case of local transport. Urban Studies 38, 1319-1327.
23. Sen, A.K., 2011 [1980]. Equality of what? In: McMurrin, S. (ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 195-220.
24. Stark, A., 2002. Beyond choice: rethinking the post- Rawlsian debate over egalitarian justice. Political Theory 30, 36-67.