A comparative study on industrial competitiveness of world cities

International Review of Public Administration

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 57-70

  Hun Min, Kim ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Industrial competitiveness; Producer services; World city

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881835374     PISSN: 12294659     EISSN: 2331795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2004.10805039     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beaverstock, J. V., P. J. Taylor and R. G. Smith. 1999. A Roster of World Cities. Cities 16(6): 445-458
2. Beaverstock, J. V., R. G. Smith, P. J. Taylor, D. R. F. Walker and H. Lorime. 2000. Globalization and World Cities: Some Measurement Methodologies. Applied Geography 20: 43-63.
3. Chevrant-Breton, Marie. 1997. Selling the World City: A Comparison of Promotional Strategies in Paris and London. European Planning Studies 5(2): 137-162.
4. Clark, D. 1996. Urban World/Global City. London: Routledge.
5. Coffey, W. J. and R. G. Shearmur. 2002. Agglomeration and Dispersion of High-order Service Employment in the Montreal Metropolitan Region 1981-1986. Urban Studies 39(3): 359-378.
6. Douglass, M. 2000. Mega-urban Regions and World City Formation: Globalisation, the Economic Crisis and Urban Policy Issues in Pacific Asia. Urban Studies 37(12): 2315-2335.
7. Friedmann, J. and G. Wolff. 1982. World City Formation: an Agenda for Research and Action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 6(3): 309-344.
8. Friedmann, J. 1986. The World City Hypothesis. Development and Change 17(1).
9. Hill, R. C. and J. W. Kim. 2000. Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo and Seoul. Urban Studies 37(12): 2167-2195.
10. King, A. D. 1990. Global Cities: Post-imperialism and the Internationalisation of London London: Rout-ledge.
11. Knox, P. L. and P.J. Taylor (eds). 1995. World Cities in a World-system. Cambridge University Press.
12. Lo, F.H. and Yue-man Yeung (eds). 1998. Globalization and the World of Large Cities. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
13. Morshidi, S. 2000. Globalising Kuala Lumpur and the Strategic Role of the Producer Service Sector. Urban Studies 37(12): 2217-2240.
14. Ng, M. K. and P. Hills. 2003. World Cities or Great Cities? A Comparative Study of Five Asian Metropolises. Cities 20(3): 151-165.
15. Sassen, S. 2000. Cities in a World Economy, 2nd. London: Pine Forge Press.
16. Sassen, S. 2001. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, 2nd. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
17. Sassen, S. (ed). 2002. Global Networks, Linked Cities. New York: Routledge.
18. Saito, A. and A. Thornley. 2003. Shift in Tokyo’s World City Status and the Urban Planning Response. Urban Studies 40(4): 665-685.
19. Shearmur, R. and C. Alvergne. 2002. Intrametropolitan Patterns of High-order Business Service Location: A Comparative Study of Seventeen Sectors in Ile-de-France. Urban Studies 39(7): 1143-1163.
20. Short, J. R., Y Kim, M. Kuss and H. Wells. 1996. The Dirty Little Secret of World Cities Research: Data Problems in Comparative Analysis. International Journal ofUrban and Regional Research 20: 697-717.
21. Short, J. R. and Y. U. Kim. 1999. Globalization and the City. New York: Longman.
22. Taylor, P. J. 2000. World Cities and Territorial States under Conditions of Contemporary Globalization. Political Geography 19:5-32.
23. Wang, C. H. 2003. Taipei as a Global City: A Theoretical and Empirical Examination. Urban Studies 40(2): 309-334.
24. Yusuf, S. and W. Wu. 2002. Pathways to a World City: Shanghai Rising in an Era of Globalisation. Urban Studies 39(7): 1213-1240.