Group litigation before the European court of justice

Civil Society and Legitimate European Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 89-114

  Schutter, Olivier De ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881810728     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Arnull, A. (1995), 'Private Applicants and the Action for Annulment under Article 173 of the EC Treaty', Common Market Law Review, 32, 7-49.
2. Biernat, E. (2003), 'The Locus Standi of Private Applicants under article 230(4) EC and the Principle of Judicial Protection in the European Community', Jean Monnet Working Paper NYU School of Law, 12/03.
3. Christianos, C. (1992), 'La recevabilité des actions de groupe devant la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes', in Th. Bourgoignie (ed.), L'action Collective et la Défense des Consommateurs, Bruxelles: Story-Scientia, pp. 217-237.
4. Cygan, A. (2003), 'Protecting the Interests of Civil Society in Community Decision-Making - the Limits of Article 230 EC', International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52, 995-1012.
5. Davis, K. (1955), 'Standing to Challenge Governmental Action', Minnesota Law Review, 39, 353, 386-391.
6. De Schutter, O., Lebessis, N. and Paterson, J. (eds) (2000), Governance in the European Union, Luxembourg: OOPEC.
7. Farber, D. A. and Frickey, Ph. P. (1986-1987), 'Practical Reason and the First Amendment', University of California at Los Angeles Law Review, 34, 1615.
8. Hanf, D. (2002), 'Facilitating Private Applicants' Access to European Courts? On the Possible Impact of the CFI's Ruling in Jégo-Quéré', German Law Journal, 3 (7).
9. Harlow, C. (1992), 'Towards a Theory of Access for the European Court of Justice', Yearbook of European Law, 12, 213.
10. Harlow, C. (2002), 'Public Law and Popular Justice', Modern Law Review, 65, 1-18.
11. Jaffe, L. L. (1961), 'Standing to Secure Judicial Review: Public Actions', Harvard Law Review, 74, 1265, 1276-1281.
12. Jaffe, L. L. (1968), 'The Citizen as Litigant in Public Actions: The Non-Hohfeldian or Ideological Plaintiff', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 116, 1033.
13. Krämer, L. (1988), La C.E.E. et la protection du consommateur, Bruxelles: Story-Scientia.
14. Lenaerts, K. and Vanhamme, L. (1997), 'Procedural Rights of Private Parties in the Community Administrative Process', Common Market Law Review, 531, 562-566.
15. Michelman, F. (1988), 'Law's Republic', Yale Law Journal, 97, 1493-1537.
16. Neuwahl, N. (1996), 'Article 173 paragraph 4 EC: Past, Present and Possible Future', European Law Review, 21, 17-31.
17. Parker, K. E. and Stone, R. (1978), 'Standing and Public Law Remedies', Columbia Law Review, 78, 771.
18. Rasmussen, H. (1980), 'Why Is Article 173 Interpreted Against Private Plaintiffs ?', European Law Review, 5, 112, 117-119.
19. Stewart, R. and Sunstein, C. (1982), 'Public Programs and Private Rights', Harvard Law Review, 95, 1193.
20. Stone, C. (1972), 'Should Trees Have Standing - Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects', Southern California Law Review, 45, 450.
21. Stone, C. (1985-1986), 'Should Trees Have Standing Revisited: How Far Will Law and Morals Reach - A Pluralist Perspective', Southern California Law Review, 59, 1.
22. Sunstein, C. (1992), 'What's Standing After Lujan? Of Citizen Suits, 'Injuries', and Article III', Michigan Law Review, 91, 163, 192-193.
23. Weatherwill, St. (1996), 'Public Interest Litigation in EC Competition Law', in H.-W. Micklitz and N. Reich (eds), Public Interest Litigation before European Courts, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 169-189.