Critical management studies: Towards a more mature politics

Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 174-194

  Grey, Christopher ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881785804     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845426743.00016     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Adler, P. (2002), ‘Critical in the name of whom and what?', Organization, 9(3), 11-32.
2. Alvesson, M. and H. Willmott (eds) (1992), Critical Management Studies, London: Sage.
3. Anthony, P. (1986), The Foundations of Management, London: Tavistock.
4. Anthony, P. (1998), ‘Management education: ethics versus morality’, in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics and Organization, London: Sage, pp. 269-81.
5. Baritz, L. (1960), Servants of Power, Middletown, PA: Wesleyan University Press.
6. Chua, W.-F. (1986), ‘Radical developments in accounting thought’, Accounting Review, 61(4), 601-32.
7. Clegg, S. (1990), Frameworks of Power, London: Sage.
8. Clegg, S. and D. Dunkerley (eds) (1977), Critical Issues in Organizations, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9. Clegg, S., C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds) (1996), Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage.
10. Collinson, D. (2002), ‘A response to Wray-Bliss: revisiting the shopfloor’, Organization, 9(1), 41-50.
11. Engwall, L. and V. Zamagni (eds) (1998), Management Education in Historical Perspective, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
12. Fournier, V. and C. Grey (2000), ‘At the critical moment: conditions and prospects for critical management studies’, Human Relations, 53(1), 7-32.
13. Frank, T. (2001), One Market Under God, London: Weidenfield & Nicholson.
14. Grey, C. (1994), ‘Debating Foucault: a critical reply to Neimark’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 5(1), 5-24.
15. Grey, C. (2002), ‘What are business schools for? On silence and voice in management education’, Journal of Management Education, 26(1), 496-511.
16. Grey, C. (2003), ‘The fetish of change’, Journal of Critical Postmodern Organizational Science, 2(2), 1-19.
17. Grey, C. (2004), ‘Re-inventing business schools: the contribution of critical management education’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(2), 178-86.
18. Hopwood, A. (1974), Accounting and Human Behavior, London: Prentice-Hall.
19. Jermier, J. (1981), ‘Infusion of critical social theory into organizational analysis’, in D. Dunkerley and G. Salaman (eds), The International Yearbook of Organization Studies, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 195-211.
20. Locke, R. (1989), Management and Higher Education since 1940, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Locke, R. (1996), The Collapse of the American Management Mystique, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. March, J. (2000), ‘Plenary address’, 16th EGOS Colloquium, Helsinki University, Finland, July.
23. Neimark, M. (1990), ‘The king is dead, long live the king’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 1(1), 103-14.
24. Orlikowski, W. and J. Baroudi (1991), ‘Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions’, Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.
25. Parker, M. (1999), ‘Capitalism, subjectivity and ethics: debating labour process analysis’, Organization Studies, 16(4), 553-64.
26. Parker, M. (2002), Against Management, Cambridge: Polity.
27. Pollard, S. (1965), The Genesis of Modern Management, London: Penguin.
28. Thompson, P. (1993), ‘Fatal distraction: postmodernism and organization theory’, in J. Hassard and M. Parker (eds), Postmodernism and Organizations, London: Sage, pp. 41-62.
29. Thompson, P. (2001), ‘Progress, practice and profits: how critical is critical management studies?', Paper presented at Labour Process Conference, Royal Holloway College, University of London, March.
30. Thompson, P. and S. Ackroyd (1995), ‘All quiet on the workplace front: a critique of recent trends in British industrial sociology’, Sociology, 29, 615-33.
31. Thompson, P., C. Smith and S. Ackroyd (2000), ‘If ethics is the answer, you’ve been asking the wrong questions: a reply to Martin Parker’, Organization Studies, 21(6), 1149-58.
32. Tinker, A. (1985), Paper Prophets, New York: Praeger.
33. Tinker, A. (2002), ‘Disciplinary spin’, Organization, 9(3), 419-27.
34. Tinker, A., B. Moreno and M. Neimark (1982), ‘The normative origins of positive theories’, Accounting Organizations and Society, 7(2), 167-200.
35. Walsh, J. and K. Weber (2002), ‘The prospects for critical management studies in the American Academy of Management’, Organization, 9(3), 402-10.
36. Wray-Bliss, E. (2002), ‘Abstract ethics, embodied ethics: the strange marriage of Foucault and positivism in labour process theory’, Organization, 9(1), 5-39.
37. Zald, M. (2002), ‘Spinning disciplines: critical management studies in the context of the transformation of management education’, Organization, 9(3), 365-85.