Should evaluation be revisited for sustainable development?

Sustainable Development, Evaluation and Policy-Making: Theory, Practise and Quality Assurance

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 37-54

  Meyer, Wolfgang ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881755323     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781953525.00009     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Alexander, J.C. (1998) Neofunctionalism and After, Blackwell, London and Malden.
2. Alexander, J.C., B. Giessen, R. Münch and N.J. Smelser (eds) (1987) The Micro- Macro Link, University of California Press, Berkeley.
3. Alkin, M.C. (1969) 'Evaluation Theory Development', Evaluation Comment, 2 (1), 2-7.
4. Alkin, M.C. (ed) (2004) Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists' Views and Influences, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
5. Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L.A., V.S. Kouikoglou and Y.A. Phillis (2004) 'Evaluating Strategies for Sustainable Development: Fuzzy Logic Reasoning and Sensitivity Analysis', Ecological Economics, 48 (2), 149-172.
6. Bamberger, M., J. Rugh and L. Mabry (2006) RealWorld Evaluation. Working Under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
7. Campbell, D.T. (1975) 'Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change', in G.M. Lyons (ed), Social Research and Public Policies, Dartmouth College, Hanover, pp. 3-45.
8. Chen, H. (1990) Theory-Driven Evaluations, Sage, Newbury Park.
9. Cornelissen, A.M.G., J. van den Berg, W.J. Koops, M. Grossman and H.M.J. Udo (2000) Assessment of Sustainable Development: A Novel Approach Using Fuzzy Set Theory, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
10. Cousins, J.B. and L.M. Earl (1995) Participatory Evaluation in Education: Studies in Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning, Falmer Press, London.
11. Fetterman, D.M. (2000) Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
12. Fitzpatrick, J.L., J.R. Sanders and B.R. Worthen (2004) Program Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, Pearson, Boston et al. (3rd edition).
13. Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage, Newbury Park.
14. House, E. (1978) 'Assumptions Underlying Evaluation Models', Educational Researcher, 7 (3), 4-12.
15. International Association for Impact Assessment (2002) Strategic Environmental Assessment. Performance Criteria, IAIA, Fargo. http://www.iaia.org/public documents/special-publications/sp1.pdf, 25 April 2011.
16. International Association for Impact Assessment (2009) What Is Impact Assessment?, IAIA, Fargo. http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/What% 20is% 20IA_web.pdf, 25 April 2011.
17. International Association for Impact Assessment and Institute of Environmental Assessment (2005) Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment. Best Practice, IAIA, Fargo. http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/Principles %20 of%20IA_web.pdf, 25 April 2011.
18. Linneweber, V. (1998) 'Nachhaltige Entwicklung als Unscharfes Prädikat. Sustainable Development as a Fuzzy Set', Umweltpsychologie, 2 (1), 66-77.
19. Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
20. Mark, M.M., G.T. Henry and G. Julnes (2000) Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding and Improving Public and Nonprofit Policies and Programs, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
21. Meyer, W. (2007) 'Vertical Dimension of Social Integration: Grass-Roots Activities for Managing Sustainability', in R.N. Pati and O. Schwarz-Herion (eds), Sustainable Development. Issues and Perspectives, D.K. Printworld, New Delhi, pp. 99-123.
22. Meyer, W. and S. Elbe (2007) 'Initiating Network Governance through Competition: Experiences from Eighteen German Regions', in L. Cheshire, V. Higgins and G. Lawrence (eds), Rural Governance: International Perspectives, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 81-97.
23. Münch, R. (2010) Theory of Action. Towards a New Synthesis Going Beyond Parsons, Routledge Revivals, London.
24. Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System, Routledge, London.
25. Patton, M.Q. (1986) Utilization-Focused Evaluation, Sage, Beverly Hills.
26. Porter, A.L. and J.J. Fittipaldi (eds) (1998) Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, IAIA, Fargo. http://www.iaia.org /publicdocuments/special-publications/Green%20Book_Environmental%20Metho ds%20Review.pdf, 25 April 2011.
27. Provus, M.M. (1971) Discrepancy Evaluation, McCutchan, Berkeley.
28. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press, Cambridge.
29. Rossi, P.H., M.W. Lipsey and H.E. Freeman (2004) Evaluation. A Systematic Approach, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
30. Sanders, J.R. and D.J. Cunningham (1973) 'A Structure for Formative Evaluation in Product Development', Review of Educational Research, 43 (2), 217-236.
31. Scriven, M. (1980) The Logic of Evaluation, Edgepress, Inverness.
32. Stake, R.E. (1975) Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation, Western Michigan University Evaluation Center, Kalamazoo.
33. Stockmann, R. (2008) Evaluation and Quality Management. Principles of Impact- Based Quality Management, Peter Lang, Frankfurt et al.
34. Stockmann, R. (2011) 'An Introduction to Evaluation', in R. Stockmann (ed), A Practitioner Handbook on Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, pp. 13-61.
35. Stockmann, R. and W. Meyer (2012) Evaluation: An Introduction (forthcoming; German edition available: R. Stockmann and W. Meyer (2010) Evaluation. Eine Einführung, Verlag Barbara Budrich, Opladen and Farmington Hills).
36. forthcoming; German edition available: R. Stockmann and W. Meyer (2010) Evaluation. Eine Einführung, Verlag Barbara Budrich, Opladen and Farmington Hills).
37. Stufflebeam, D.L. (1971) 'The Relevance of the CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability', Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5 (1), 19-25.
38. Suchman, E. (1967) Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs, Russell Sage, New York.
39. Tyler, R.W. (1942) 'General Statement on Evaluation', Journal of Educational Research, 35 (7), 492-501.
40. United Nations (1992) Agenda 21, United Nations, New York.
41. United Nations General Assembly (2005) 2005 World Summit Outcome, United Nations, New York.
42. VCI [Verband der Chemischen Industrie] (1996) Verantwortliches Handeln. Daten zur Sicherheit, Gesundheit, Umweltschutz. Ein Deutscher Beitrag zum Weltweiten Responsible Care-Programm der Chemischen Industrie, VCI, Frankfurt am Main.
43. WCED [World Commission on Environment and Development] (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York.
44. Whitmore, E. (1998) Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation, Jossey- Bass, San Francisco.
45. Wholey, J.S. (1983) Evaluation and Effective Public Management, Little Brown, Boston.