Commercialized assisted reproduction

Ethical Dilemmas in Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 363-370

  Křepelka, Filip ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881743617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110240214     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Brown S. Poles apart: focus on reproduction. January 2010, 30-34. http://www.eshre.eu/01/default.aspx?pageid=912. Accessed April 8, 2011.
2. Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine. Council of Europe Treaty Series 164 (the Oviedo Convention).
3. DeBlasio SL. Patents on medical procedures and the physician profiteer. Findlaw. 2004. http://library.findlaw.com/2004/Sep/19/133572.html. Accessed April 8, 2011.
4. European Union. Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells.
5. Evans v. United Kingdom. ECHR judgment on complaint 6339/05. April 10, 2007.
6. Kraske M, Ludwig Z. Die Babygrenze. Der Spiegel, 2005, 46. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-43103148.html. Accessed April 8, 2011.
7. Mattoras R. Reproductive exile versus reproductive tourism. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(12):3571-3573.
8. Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren KG, et al. World collaborative report on assisted reproductive technology, 2002. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2310-2320.
9. Pearson M. Disparities in health expenditures in OECD countries: why does the United States spend so much more than other countries? Written Statement to Senate Special Committee on Aging. 2009. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/34/43800977.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2011.
10. R. v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood. 1997 2 All ER 687 (Court of Appeal, United Kingdom).
11. Robertson JA. Book review essay: Commerce and regulation in the reproductive treatment industry. Texas L Rev. 2007;85:665-702. http://www.utexas.edu/law/journals/tlr/assets/current/Robertson.Proof.Final.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2011.
12. S. H. and others v Austria. ECHR Judgment on complaint 57813/00. April 1, 2010.
13. Shenfield F, Mouzon J, Pennings G, et al. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries, Hum Reprod. 2010:1-8. http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/deq057v1. Accessed April 8, 2011.
14. Telegraph. Turkey bans trips abroad for artificial insemination. Telegraph (London), March 15, 2010. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/turkey/7450571/Turkey-banstrips-abroad-for-artificial-insemination.html. Accessed April 8, 2011.
15. Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD, eds. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction (report). Medical, Ethical, and Social Aspects of Reproductive Treatment, World Health Organization Geneva, September 17-21, 2001.
16. World Medical Association. Statement on patenting medical procedures, 51st Assembly of the World Medical Association, Tel Aviv, 1999. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/m30/index.html. Accessed April 8, 2011.