Groundwater optimization model for sustainable management of the Valley of Puebla aquifer, Mexico

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 337-351

  Salcedo Sánchez, Edith R ^a,b   Esteller, Ma Vicenta ^a,b   Garrido Hoyos, Sofía E ^b   Martínez Morales, Manuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO MEXICANO DE TECNOLOGÍA DEL AGUA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Groundwater management; Optimization model; Overexploitation; Simulation

Indexed keywords

COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS; GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT; INTENSIVE EXPLOITATIONS; OPTIMIZATION MODELS; OVEREXPLOITATION; SIMULATION; SIMULATION-OPTIMIZATION MODELS; SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT;

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXTRACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PUMPS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION; GROUNDWATER FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PIEZOMETER; PUMPING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER DEMAND; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER TABLE; WATER TREATMENT;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; PUEBLA VALLEY AQUIFER;

EID: 84881666970     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012-2131-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson MP, Woessner W (1992) Applied groundwater modeling: simulation of flow and advective transport. Academic Press, New York, p 381.
2. CONAGUA (2000) Actualización Hidrogeológica del Acuífero Alto Atoyac, Estado de Tlaxcala, Departamento de Aguas Subterráneas, Subgerencia Técnica, Gerencia Estatal Tlaxcala, México.
3. CONAGUA (2003) Determinación de la Disponibilidad de agua subterránea en el acuífero Valle de Puebla, Estado de Puebla, Gerencia de Aguas Subterráneas, Subgerencia de Evaluación y Modelación Hidrogeológica, México.
4. CONAGUA (2004) Zonas de reserva de agua potable para la Ciudad de Puebla, Pue. Gerencia de Aguas Subterráneas, Subgerencia de Evaluación and Modelación Hidrogeológica, Mexico.
5. CONAGUA (2010) REPDA Registro Público de Derechos de Agua Online IOP. http://www. cna. gob. mx/Repda. aspx?n1=5&n2=37&n3=115. Accessed 31 May 2010.
6. CONAGUA-IMTA (2007) Manejo Integrado de las aguas subterráneas en los Acuíferos Puebla- Alto Atoyac, Estados de Puebla and Tlaxcala. Gerencia de Aguas Subterráneas, Mexico.
7. Das A, Bithin D (2001) Application of optimization techniques in groundwater quantity and quality management. Sadhana 26(4): 293-316.
8. Elwell BO, Lall U (1988) Determination of an optimal aquifer yield, with salt-lake county applications. J Hydrol 104(1-4): 273-287.
9. Flores-Márquez EL, Jiménez-Suárez G, Martínez-Serrano RG, Chavéz RE, Silva-Pérez D (2006) Study of geothermal water intrusion due to groundwater exploitation in the Puebla Valley aquifer system, Mexico. Hydrogeol J 14(7): 1216-1230.
10. Gárfias J, Arroyo N, Aravena R (2010) Hydrochemistry and origins of mineralized waters in the Puebla aquifer system, Mexico. Environ Earth Sci 59(8): 1789-1805.
11. Geotecnología S A (1997) Actualización del estudio geohidrológico de los acuíferos de Valle de Puebla, Sistema Operador de Agua potable and Alcantarillado de Puebla (SOAPAP), México.
12. Gorelick SM (1983) A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. Water Resour Res 19(2): 305-319.
13. Gorelick SM, Remson I (1982) Optimal location and management of waste disposal facilities affecting ground water quality. Water Resour Bull 18(1): 43-51.
14. Harou JJ, Lund J (2008) Representing groundwater in water management models-applications in California. California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research Program Report. http://www. energy. ca. gov/2008publications/CEC-500-2008-092/CEC-500-2008-092-REV. PDF. Accessed 20 September 2010.
15. Harou JJ, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg DE, Medellin-Azuara J, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2009) Hydroeconomic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 375(3-4): 627-643.
16. Heidari M (1982) Application of linear systems theory and linear programming to groundwater management in Kansas. Water Resour Bull 18(6): 1003-1012.
17. Kemper K, Foster S, Garduño H, Nanni N, Tuinhof A (2004) Economic Instruments for Groundwater Management. Using incentives to improve sustainability. Brief Note 7 World Bank, Washington DC, pp 1-8.
18. Larson KJ, Basagaoglu H, Marino MA (2001) Prediction of optimal safe ground water yield and land subsidence in the Los Banos-Kettleman City area, California, using a calibrated numerical simulation model. J Hydrol 242(1-2): 79-102.
19. Lesser and Asociados SA De CV (1982) Estudio Geohidrológico de la zona río Atoyac, Estado de Puebla. Gerencia de Aguas Subterráneas, Subgerencia de Evaluación and Modelación Hidrogeológica. CNA-SARH, México.
20. Lindo Systems Inc (2011) LINDO 6. 1 Systems-optimization software: integer programming, linear programming. http://www. lindo. com/.
21. Maddock T III (1972) Algebraic technological function from a simulation model. Water Resour Res 8(1): 129-134.
22. Maddock T III, Lacher L (1991) MODRSP: a program to calculate drawdown, velocity, storage and capture response functions for multi-aquifer systems. HWR Report No. 91-020, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
23. McDonald MG and Harbaugh AW (1988) MODFOW, a modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model- U-S. G. S. Open file report 83-875.
24. McPhee J, Yeh WWG (2004) Multiobjective optimization for sustainable groundwater management in semiarid regions. J Water Resour Plann Manage 130(6): 490-497.
25. Nishikawa T (1998) Water resources optimization model for Santa Barbara, California. J Water Resour Plan Manage 124(5): 252-263.
26. Waller-Barrera C, Medellín-Azuar J, Lund JR (2009) Optimización económico-ingenieril del suministro agrícola y urbano: una aplicación de reúso del agua en Ensenada, Baja California, México. Ingeniería Hidráulica en México 26(4): 87-103.
27. Zhou X, Chen M, Liang C (2003) Optimal schemes of groundwater exploitation for prevention of sea water intrusion in the Leizhou Peninsula in southern China. Environ Geol 43: 978-985.