The role of 3D structure and protein conformation on the innate andadaptive immune responses to silk-based biomaterials

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 33, 2013, Pages 8161-8171

  Bhattacharjee, Maumita ^a,b,c   Schultz Thater, Elke ^b   Trella, Emanuele ^b   Miot, Sylvie ^b   Das, Sanskrita ^a,c   Loparic, Marko ^d   Ray, Alok R ^a,c   Martin, Ivan ^b   Spagnoli, Giulio C ^b   Ghosh, Sourabh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Cytokines; Monocyte activation; Silk based biomaterials; Structural architectures

Indexed keywords

CYTOKINES; FIBROIN-BASED MATERIAL; MONOCYTE ACTIVATION; PERIPHERAL BLOOD; PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PRODUCTION; STRUCTURAL ARCHITECTURE;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; GENE EXPRESSION; PROTEINS;

BODY FLUIDS;

BIOMATERIAL; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; INTERLEUKIN 10; INTERLEUKIN 1BETA; INTERLEUKIN 6; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE P38; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; SILK;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BOMBYX MORI; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOKINE RELEASE; FREEZE DRYING; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; INNATE IMMUNITY; MONOCYTE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; T LYMPHOCYTE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CYTOKINES; MONOCYTE ACTIVATION; SILK-BASED BIOMATERIALS; STRUCTURAL ARCHITECTURES;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CYTOKINES; HUMANS; IMMUNITY, INNATE; INTERLEUKIN-10; INTERLEUKIN-6; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MONOCYTES; NF-KAPPA B; SILK; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED;

EID: 84881666311     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Altman G.H., Diaz F., Jakuba C., Calabro T., Horan R.L., Chen J., et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2003, 24:401-416.
2. Bhattacharjee M., Miot S., Gorecka A., Singha K., Loparic M., Dickinson S., et al. Oriented lamellar silk fibrous scaffolds to drive cartilage matrix orientation: towards annulus fibrosus tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:3313-3325.
3. Kim D.H., Viventi J., Amsden J.J., Xiao J., Vigeland L., Kim Y.S., et al. Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nat Mater 2010, 9:511-517.
4. Salthouse T.N., Matlaga B.F., Wykoff M.H. Comparative tissue response to six suture materials in rabbit cornea, sclera, and ocular muscle. Am J Ophthalmol 1977, 84:224-233.
5. Salthouse T.N. Biologic response to sutures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980, 88:658-664.
6. Rossitch E., Bullard D.E., Oakes W.J. Delayed foreign-body reaction to silk sutures in pediatric neurosurgical patients. Childs Nerv Syst 1987, 3:375-378.
7. Soong H.K., Kenyon K.R. Adverse reactions to virgin silk sutures in cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 1984, 91:479-483.
8. Hollander D.H. Interstitial cystitis and silk allergy. Med Hypotheses 1994, 43:155-156.
9. Wen C.M., Ye S.T., Zhou L.X., Yu Y. Silk-induced asthma in children: a report of 64 cases. Ann Allergy 1990, 65:375-378.
10. Kurosaki S., Otsuka H., Kunitomo M., Koyama M., Pawanka R., Matumoto K. Fibroin allergy: IgE mediated hypersensitivity to silk suture materials. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi 1999, 66:41-44.
11. Uff C.R., Scott A.D., Pockley A.G., Phillips R.K.S. Influence of soluble suture factors on invitro macrophage function. Biomaterials 1995, 16:355-360.
12. Dewair M., Baur X., Ziegler K. Use of immunoblot technique for detection of human IgE and IgG antibodies to individual silk proteins. JAllergy Clin Immunol 1985, 76:537-542.
13. Zaoming W., Codina R., Fernandez-Caldas E., Lockey R.F. Partial characterization of the silk allergens in mulberry silk extract. JInvestig Allergol Clin Immunol 1996, 6:237-241.
14. Santin M., Motta A., Freddi G., Cannas M. Invitro evaluation of the inflammatory potential of the silk fibroin. JBiomed Mater Res 1999, 43:382-389.
15. Panilaitis B., Altman G.H., Chen, Jin H.J., Karageorgiou V., Kaplan D.L. Macrophage responses to silk. Biomaterials 2003, 24:3079-3085.
16. Meinel L., Hofmann S., Karageorgiou V., Head C.K., McCool J., Gronowicz G., et al. The inflammatory responses to silk films invitro and invivo. Biomaterials 2005, 26:147-155.
17. Dal P.I., Freddi G., Minic J., Chiarini A., Armato U. De novo engineering of reticular connective tissue invivo by silk fibroin nonwoven materials. Biomaterials 2005, 26:1987-1999.
18. Wooley P.H., Morren R., Andary J., Sud S., Yang S., Mayton L., et al. Inflammatory responses to orthopaedic biomaterials in the murine air pouch. Biomaterials 2002, 23:517-526.
19. Gelb H., Schumacher H.R., Cuckler J., Ducheyne P., Baker D.G. Invivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particulate debris: effect of size, morphology, and surface area. JOrthop Res 1994, 12:83-92.
20. Young T.H., Lin D.T., Chen L.Y. Human monocyte adhesion and activation on crystalline polymers with different morphology and wettability invitro. JBiomed Mater Res 2000, 50:490-498.
21. Bartneck M., Heffels K.H., Pan Y., Bovi M., Zwadlo-Klarwasser G., Groll J. Inducing healing-like human primary macrophage phenotypes by 3D hydrogel coated nanofibres. Biomaterials 2012, 33:4136-4146.
22. Ratner B.D., Bryant S.J. Biomaterials: where we have been and where we are going. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004, 6:41-75.
23. Zimecki M., Webb D.R. The influence of molecular weight on immunogenicity and suppressor cells in the immune response to polyvinylpyrollidone. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1978, 9:75-79.
24. Hu X., Kaplan D.L., Cebe P. Determining beta-sheet crystallinity in fibrous proteins by thermal analysis and infrared spectroscopy. Macromolecules 2006, 39:6161-6170.
25. Loparic M., Wirz D., Daniels A.U., Raiteri R., Vanlandingham M.R., Guex G., et al. Micro-and nanomechanical analysis of articular cartilage by indentation-type atomic force microscopy: validation with a gel-microfiber composite. Biophys J 2010, 98:2731-2740.
26. Hutter J.L., Bechhoefer J. Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev Sci Instrum 1993, 64:1868-1873.
27. Plodinec M., Loparic M., Monnier C.A., Obermann E.C., Zanetti-Dallenbach R., Oertle P., et al. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol 2012, 7:757-765.
28. Schulz-Thater E., Frey D.M., Margelli D., Raafat N., Mengus C.F., Spagnoli G.C., et al. Whole blood assessment of antigen specific cellular immune response by real time quantitative PCR: a versatile monitoring and discovery tool. JTransl Med 2008, 6:58.
29. Bainbridge J.A., Revell P.A., Al-Saffar N. Costimulatory molecule expression following exposure to orthopaedic implants wear debris. JBiomed Mater Res 2001, 54:328-334.
30. Teramoto H., Miyazawa M. Molecular orientation behavior of silk sericin filmas revealed by ATR infrared spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:2049-2057.
31. Ha S.W., Tonelli A.E., Hudson S.M. Structural studies of Bombyx mori silk fibroin during regeneration from solutions and wet fiber spinning. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:1722-1731.
32. Jin H., Kaplan D.L. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 2003, 424:1057-1061.
33. Nogueira G.M., Rodas A.C.D., Leite C.A.P., Giles C., Higa O.Z., Polakiewicz B., et al. Preparation and characterization of ethanol-treated silk fibroin dense membranes for biomaterials application using waste silk fibers as raw material. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:8446-8451.
34. Jin H.J., Park J., Karageorgiou V., Kim U.J., Valluzzi R., Cebe P., et al. Water-stable silk films with reduced β-sheet content. Adv Funct Mater 2005, 15:1241-1247.
35. Lu Q., Hu X., Wang X., Kluge J.A., Lu S., Cebe P., et al. Water-insoluble silk films with silk I structure. Acta Biomater 2010, 6:1380-1387.
36. McBane J.E., Ebadi D., Sharifpoor S., Labow R.S., Santerre J.P. Differentiation of monocytes on a degradable, polar, hydrophobic, ionic polyurethane: two-dimensional films vs. three-dimensional scaffolds. Acta Biomater 2011, 7:115-122.
37. Blakney A.K., Swartzlander M.D., Bryant S.J. The effects of substrate stiffness on the invitro activation of macrophages and invivo host response to poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels. JBiomed Mater Res A 2012, 100:1375-1386.
38. Irwin E.F., Saha K., Rosenbluth M., Gamble L.J., Castner D.G., Healy K.E. Modulus-dependent macrophage adhesion and behavior. JBiomater Sci Polym Ed 2008, 19:1363-1382.
39. Rudra J.S., Tian Y.F., Jung J.P., Collier J.H. Aself-assembling peptide acting as an immune adjuvant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:622-627.
40. Maas C., Hermeling S., Bouma B., Jiskoot W., Gebbink M.F. Arole for protein misfolding in immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. JBiol Chem 2007, 282:2229-2236.
41. Dintzis H.M., Dintzis R., Vogelstein B. Molecular determinants of immunogenicity: the immunon model of immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1976, 73:3671-3675.
42. Martinez F.O., Sica A., Mantovani A., Locati M. Macrophage activation and polarization. Front Biosci 2008, 13:453-461.
43. Seo Y.K., Yoon H.H., Park Y.S., Song K.Y., Lee W.S., Park J.K. Correlation between scaffold invivo biocompatibility and invitro cell compatibility using mesenchymal and mononuclear cell cultures. Cell Biol Toxicol 2009, 25:513-522.