Cosmopolitan legal studies

International Journal of the Legal Profession

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 99-108

  Twining, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881661952     PISSN: 09695958     EISSN: 14699257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969595022000019256     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Schum, D., 1994. Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning, New York: Wiley.
2. HampsherMonk, I., and Twining, W.L., eds. 2002. Evidence and Inference in History and Law, Evanston, Ill.: North-western University Press.
3. Twining, W.L., 1994. Rethinking Evidence, 81–82. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
4. Twining, W.L., 2002. “ Reviving general jurisprudence ”. In Transnational Legal Processes, Edited by: Likosky, M., London: Butterworth.
5. Twining, W.L., 2002. The Great Juristic Bazaar, Aldershot: Ashgate. William Twining is Research Professor of Law at the University College London (UCL). This is a modified version of a paper presented to the American Bar Association Conference in London in July 2000. Some of the themes are further developed in
6. Likosky, M., ed. 2002. Transnational Legal Processes, London: Butterworth.
7. Held, D., 1995. Democracy and Global Order, Cambridge: Polity Press. For example, see
8. Nussbaum, M., 1996. For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Bowen, E.D., 1954. Return to Laughter, London: Gollancz. For example, see
10. Vansina, J., ed. 1994. Living With Africa, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
11. Rheinstein, M., 1968. Comparative law–its functions, methods and usages. Arkansas Law Review, 22: 415–425.
12. Simon, Herbert. 1980. Problem solving and education
13. Simon, H., 1989. Models of Thought, 2 vols, Vol. II, 278New Haven: Yale University Press. LIC, 333-336
14. Baker, Christopher, ed. 1998. Human Rights Act, 1998: A Practitioner's Guide, London: Sweet and Maxwell. The Human Rights Act, 1998 does not 'incorporate' the European Convention into domestic law, but rather gives 'further effect' to Convention rights. The consequence is that Convention rights, as such, will not be directly justiciable and enforceable by domestic courts. The full implications of this distinction are not yet apparent. See
15. Twining, William. 2000. Globalisation and Legal Theory, London: Butterworth. (hereafter GLT). See also
16. Twining, William. 1994. Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School, London: Sweet and Maxwell. (hereafter BT)
17. Twining, William. 1997. Law in Context: Enlarging a Discipline, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (hereafter UC)
18. Abel, R., and Lewis, P., eds. 1989. Lawyers in Society: Comparative Theories, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. The conceptual problems are discussed, but not resolved, in
19. Barcello, J., and Cramton, R., 1999. Lawyers' Practice and Ideals: A Comparative View, Deventer: Kluwer.
20. Friedman, L., 1989. Law, lawyers and popular culture. Yale Law Journal 1579-1606, 98: 1598
21. Legrand, P., 1999. Fragments on Law-as-Culture, Deventer: Tjeenk Willink. For example
22. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edition