Connecting Municipal and Regional Level Planning: Analysis and Visualization of Sustainability Indicators in Bergslagen, Sweden

European Planning Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1210-1234

  Andersson, Kjell ^a   Angelstam, Per ^a   Axelsson, Robert ^a   Elbakidze, Marine ^a   Törnblom, Johan ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LEARNING; REGIONAL PLANNING; SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATOR; SUSTAINABILITY;

BERGSLAGEN; SWEDEN;

EID: 84881646096     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: 14695944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722943     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Af Geijerstam, J. (2007) Industriarv i förändring. Avdelningen för teknik- och vetenskapshistoria, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan och Avesta kommun. (Avesta: Centrumtryck) (in Swedish).
2. Ågren, M. 1998. Iron-making Societies. Early Industrial Development in Sweden and Russia, 1600-1900, Edited by: Ågren, M. Providence and Oxford: Berghan books.
3. Åkerskog, A. (2009) Implementeringar av miljöbedömningar i Sverige: från EG-direktiv till kommunal översiktlig planering, Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 2009, p. 2 (in Swedish).
4. Alfredsson, B. & Wiman, J. (1997) Planning in Sweden, in: C. G. Guinchard (Ed.) Swedish planning. Towards Sustainable Development. The Swedish Society for Town and Country Planning, pp. 11-18 (Gävle: The Swedish Society for Town and Country Planning).
5. Andersson, K. and Angelstam, P. 2008. " The need for empirical analyses to support regional sustainability: Visualising municipal indicator profiles using multivariate statistics and maps ". In Science for Sustainable Development-The Social Challenge with Emphasis on the Conditions for Change, Edited by: Frostell, B., Danielsson, Å., Hagberg, L., Linnér, B.-O. and Lisberg Jensen, E. 179 - 191. Uppsala: VHU.
6. Angelstam, P., Dönz-Breuss, M. and Roberge, J.-M. 2004. Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity. Ecological Bulletins, 51: 11 - 24. (USA: Wiley)
7. Angelstam, P., Andersson, K., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Jonsson, B.-G. and Roberge, J.-M. 2011. Protecting forest areas for biodiversity in Sweden 1991-2010: Policy implementation process and outcomes on the ground. Silva Fennica, 45 (5): 1111 - 1133.
8. Anonymous (1999) Kommissionens beslut av den 1 juli 1999 om fastställande av en vägledande fördelning mellan medlemsstaternaav åtagandebemyndiganden inom ramen för strukturfondernas mäl nr 2 för perioden 2000-2006. EU objektive 2, 1999/504/EG. Bryssel: Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning nr L 194 (in Swedish).
9. Anonymous (2006) Miljö- och Samhällsbyggnadsdepartementet. Indikatorer för hållbar utveckling. Regeringskansliet. Available at http://www.sweden.gov.se/download/3a2ffbbd.pdf (accessed 20 March 2011) (in Swedish).
10. Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., Diduck, A. P., Doubleday, M. C., Johnson, D. S., Marschke, M., McConney, P., Pinkerton, E. W. and Wollenberg, E. K. 2009. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7 (2): 95 - 102. (doi:10.1890/070089)
11. Asplund, E. and Hilding-Rydevik, T. 2001. Arena för hållbar utveckling, aktörer och processer, institutionen för infrastruktur och samhällsplanering, 193 Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology. (in Swedish)
12. Asplund, E. and Skantze, A. 2005. Hållbar utveckling i praktiken, möten, gränser, perspektiv, Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, TRITA-INFRA 05-11. (in Swedish)
13. Axelsson, R. (2009) Landscape approach for sustainable development. From applied research to transdisciplinary knowledge production, Doctoral thesis, Faculty of forest sciences, School for forest engineers, Swedish university of agricultural sciences, Skinnskatteberg, 2009, p. 94.
14. Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Stryamets, N. and Johansson, K. -E. 2011. Landscape approach for sustainable development and sustainability: A practical interpretation. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4 (3): 5 - 30. (doi:10.2478/v10285-012-0040-1)
15. Baker, S. 2006. Sustainable Development, London and New York: Routledge.
16. Bell, S. and Morse, S. 2003. Measuring Sustainability, London: Earthscan.
17. Bergdahl, E., Isacson, M. & Mellander, B. (1997) Bruksandan-hinder eller möjlighet? Ekomuseum Bergslagens Skriftserie 1. MediaPrint, Uddevalla (in Swedish).
18. Berger, S., Lundmark, M. & Strömberg, T. (Eds) (2006) Bergslagsidentitet i förändring: en forskningsresa i tid och rum. (Örebro: Örebro universitet) (in Swedish).
19. Bergskraft Bergslagen. Available at http://www.bergskraft.se (accesed 5 May 2012).
20. Bergslaget. Available at http://www.bergslaget.com (accesed 5 May 2012).
21. Berke, R. P. and Manta-Conroy, M. 2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66 (1): 21 - 33. (doi:10.1080/01944360008976081)
22. Berkes, F., Folke, C. and Colding, J. 2000. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. 2003. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Edited by: Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Besculides, B., Lee, M.E. & McCormick, P.J. (2002) Residents' perceptions of the cultural benefits of tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), pp. 303-319.
25. Birkmann, J. and Gleisenstein, J. Integration of Sustainable Development into regional planning documents. Objectives, Opportunities and Problems-Case Studies from Germany and Poland. ESRA Congress, Dortmund.
26. Borgström, S. T., Elmqvist, T., Angelstam, P. & Alfsen-Norodom, C. (2006) Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes, Ecology and Society, 11(2), pp. 1-16. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art16/ (accessed 1 April 2007).
27. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M., Farvar, M. T., Kothari, A. and Renard, Y. 2004. Sharing Power. Learning by Doing in Co-management of Natural Resources Throughout the World (Cenesta, Tehran: IIED and IUCN/CEESP/CMWG)
28. Bossel, H. 1999. Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications; A Report to the Balaton Group, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development. Available at http://www.iisd.org/pdf/balatonreport.pdf (accessed 1 April 2011)
29. Boverket. (2005) PilotGIS, Standarden som underlättar ditt planeringsarbete (Karlskrona: Boverket) (in Swedish).
30. Bruckmeier, K. and and Tovey, H. 2009. Rural Sustainable Development in the Knowledge Society, Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
31. Brulin, G., Sjöberg, K. and Svensson, L. 2009. Gemensam kunskapsbildning för regional tillväxt. Arbetsmarknad and Arbetsliv, årgång, 15 (1): 61 - 74. (in Swedish)
32. Brundtland, G. H. 1987. Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development, Edited by: Brundtland, G. H. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Busck, A. G., Hidding, M. C., Kristensen, S. B. P., Persson, C. & Prætholm, P. (2008) Managing rurban landscapes in the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden: Comparing planning systems and instruments in three different contexts, Danish Journal of Geography, 108(2), pp. 1-16.
34. CBD (1998) Convention on Biological Diversity. Report of the workshop on the ecosystem approach. Malawi: UNEP/CBD.
35. Cohen, J. E., Bloom, D. E. and Malin, M. B. 2006. Education All Children: A Global Agenda, Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
36. Daniels, S. E. and Walker, G. B. 2001. Working through Environmental Conflict-the Collaborative Learning Approach, Westport and London: Praeger.
37. Destination Bergslagen. Available at web.telia.com/u22317052/ (accesed 28 August 2008).
38. Dovlén, S. (2004) Commuting professional perspectives, local government and spatial planning for sustainability. Doctoral thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, p. 196.
39. Dudley, N., Schlaepfer, R., Jackson, W., Jeanrenaud, J.-P. and Stolton, S. 2006. Forest Quality. Assessing Forests at a Landscape Scale, London: Earthscan.
40. EC (2003) No (1059/2003) of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Establishment of a Common Classification of Territorial units for Statistics (NUTS), European Commission Official Journal, L 154, Brussels.
41. EC (2007) The New Programming Period 2007-2013. Indicative guidelines on evaluation methods: evaluation during the programming period. Working document No. 5, European Commission, Brussels.
42. Edlund, J. & Westin, L. (2010) Den goda staden. Improvement Districts i Sverige? Internationella erfarenheter av ett verktyg för hållbar stadsutveckling, Norrköping: Trafikverket 2010:086 (in Swedish).
43. EEA (1999) European Environmental Agency, Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview, Technical Report No. 25, Copenhagen: EEA.
44. Ekomuseum Bergslagen. Available at http://www.ekomuseum.se (accesed 5 July 2012).
45. Eniro. Available at http://www.eniro.se (accesed 5 July 2012).
46. FAO (2003) Sustainable forest management and the ecosystem approach: Two concepts, one goal. Working paper FM 25, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Forest resources division, FAO, Rome.
47. Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Berkes, F. Colding, J. & Svedin, U. (1998) The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions. IHDP Working Paper No. 2, International Human Dimensions Program of ecosystems and institutions, New York: Columbia University Press.
48. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. and Norberg, J. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30: 441 - 473. (doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511)
49. Frykman, J. & Hansen, K. (2009) I ohälsans tid (Stockholm: Carlsson förlag) (in Swedish).
50. Grahn, P. and Stigsdotter, U. A. 2003. Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2(2003): 1 - 18. (doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00019)
51. Grahn, P. and Stigsdotter, U. A. 2010. The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3-4): 264 - 275. (doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012)
52. Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R. U., Boone, C., Castillo, A., Cunfer, G, Fischer-Kowalski, M., Freudenburg, W. R., Furman, E., Kaufmann, R., Krausmann, F., Langthaler, E., Lotze-Campen, H., Mirtl, M., Redman, C. L., Reenberg, A., Wardell, A., Warr, B. and Zechmeister, H. 2006. From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research. Ecology and Society, 11 (2): 13 Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/ (accessed 20 March 2011)
53. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. (2007) PAST-Palaeontological Statistics, version 1.65. Available at http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past (accessed 20 March 2011).
54. Heckscher, E. (1935-1949) Sveriges ekonomiska historia från Gustav Vasa (Stockholm: Albert Bonniers förlag) (in Swedish).
55. Isacson, M. (1998) Bergslagen-en region med stora olikheter, Å rsskrift Ekomuseum Bergslagen, 1998(3), pp. 4-7 (in Swedish).
56. Isacson, M. 2004. Bruk och återbruk av Bergslagens landskap. Tvärsnitt nr, 3: 44 - 49. (in Swedish)
57. Isacson, M., Lundmark, M., Mörner, C. and Orre, I. (2009) Fram träder Bergslagen. Nytt ljus över gammal region. Bergslagsforskning rapport nr 3, Mälardalens högskola (in Swedish).
58. ITPS (2004a) Effektutvärdering av de geografiska målprogrammen inom EG:s strukturfonder, Östersund: ITPS (Institute for Growth Policy Studies), A2004:011 (in Swedish).
59. ITPS (2004b) Förslag till indikatorer för regional utveckling Den nya regionala utvecklingspolitiken-Hur följa upp och effektutvärdera? Östersund: ITPS (Institute for Growth Policy Studies), A2004:011 (in Swedish).
60. Jakobsson, M. (2009) Från industrier till upplevelser. En studie av symbolisk och materiell omvandling i Bergslagen, University of Örebro, Örebro (in Swedish).
61. Johannisson, E. & Ancarstig, C. (2007) Sju råd för regional hållbarhet-erfarenheter från hållbarhetsarbetet på regional nivå. Naturvårdsverket, rapport 5756 (in Swedish).
62. Jordbruksräkningen. 1932. Sveriges officiella statistik, jordbruk med binäringar, Stockholm: Statistic Sweden. (in Swedish)
63. Kaplan, S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1995): 169 - 182. (doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2)
64. Keen, M., Brown, V. and Dyball, R. 2005. Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a Sustainable Future, London: James and James/Earthscan.
65. Kerren, A., Stasko, J. T., Fekete, J.-D. and North. 2008. Information Visualization, volume 4950 of LNCS State-of-the-Art Survey, Edited by: Kerren, A., Stasko, J. T., Fekete, J.-D. and North. 46 - 64. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
66. Lammerts van Buren, E. and Blom, E. 1997. Hierarchical Framework for the Formulation of Sustainable Forest Management Standards. Principles, Criteria, Indicators, 82 AH Leiden, Netherland: Tropenbos Foundation, Backhuys Publishers.
67. Leader Bergslagen. Available at http://www.leaderbergslagen.se (accesed 5 July 2012).
68. Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope, Washington, DC: Island Press.
69. Leeuwis, C. and Pyburn, R. 2002. Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs: Social Learning in Rural Resource Management, Assen: Royal van Gorcum.
70. Linjekarta, Map over train in Bergslagen. Available at http://www.tagibergslagen.se (accessed 1 April 2011).
71. Mineur, E. (2007) Towards sustainable development: Indicators as a tool of local governance, Doctoral thesis, department of political science, Umeå University, 2007, p. 5.
72. Ministry of the Environment (2007) The Planning Act in Denmark-Consolidated Act No. 813 of 21 June 2007, Ministry of the Environment, Copenhagen.
73. Mozgeris, G. 2009. The continuous field view of representing forest geographically: From cartographic representation towards improved management planning. Sapiens, 2.2 (2): 1 - 8.
74. Naturvårdsverket and Nutek (2006) Miljömålen i det regionala utvecklingsarbetet-Synergier och målkonflikter. Naturvårdsverket and Nutek Rapport nr 5645 (in Swedish).
75. Neumayer, E. (2004) Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms (United Kingdom: Edward Elgar).
76. Nelson and H. 1913. En Bergslagsbygd. Ymer, 1913 (3): 278 - 352. (in Swedish)
77. Nilsson, K. (2001) Planering för hållbar utveckling, Dilemman för kommunala översiktsplanerare, Institutionen för infrastruktur och samhällsplanering, Licentiat thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. (in Swedish).
78. Nilsson, R., Ekström, C. & Lagnerö, M. (2002) Regional ekonomisk tillväxt i Sverige 1986-2001-en studie av tillväxtens utveckling i Sveriges lokala arbetsmarknader, Stockholm: VINNOVA Innovation i Fokus, VF 2002:3 (in Swedish).
79. Nordh, H., Grahn, P. and Währborg, P. 2009. Meaningful activities in the forest, a way back from exhaustion and long-term sick leave. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8 (3): 207 - 219. (doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.005)
80. Nordisk Familjebok (1925) Konversationslexikon och realencyklopedi (Stockholm: Nordisk familjeboks förlags aktiebolag) (in Swedish).
81. Nordström, E-M. (2010) Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis into participatory forest planning, Doctoral thesis, Swedish university of agricultural sciences, Faculty of forest sciences, Umeå, 2010, p.77.
82. NUTEK (2005) Ny normativ indelning i arbetsmarknadsregioner-Funktionella analysregioner samt Funktionella planeringsregioner för män respektive kvinnor, uppdrag till Näringsdepartementet, missiv, NUTEK, Stockholm (in Swedish).
83. Nutek (2008) Nytta med följeforskning. En vägledning i utvärdering av strukturfonderna 2007-2013, p. 16 (Stockholm NUTEK) (in Swedish).
84. NUTEK and The National Rural Development Agency (1995) Nu kan Sverige dra nytta av EUś strukturfonder! Informationsbroschyr (Stockholm NUTEK) (in Swedish).
85. OECD. 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and User Guide, Paris: OECD Publications.
86. Official Statistics Act (2001) Law on Official Statistics, p. 99 (Stockholm: SFS 2001) (in Swedish).
87. PBL (1987) Plan- och bygglagen, p. 10 (Stockholm: SFS 1987) (in Swedish).
88. Petersson, I. & Jennische, P. (2007) Hur lillebror blir stor. SLU-rapport. Dnr SLU ua 60-61/07, Umeå: SLU (in Swedish).
89. Pettersson, Ö. & Westholm, E. (1999) The Variety of Rural Change in Sweden-a socio-economic analysis based on micro regions. European Regional Science Association conference papers, Vienna, Austria.
90. Pimentel, D., Westra, L. and Noss, R. F. 2000. Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation and Health, Washington DC: Island Press.
91. Proposition (2009/2010) En enklare plan- och bygglag, p. 170 (Stockholm: Regeringskansliet) (in Swedish).
92. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. Y. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
93. Rambaldi, G., Kwaku Kyem, P. A., McCall, M. and Weiner, D. 2006. Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing counties. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25 (1): 1 - 9.
94. Riksantikvarieämbetet, Atlas över Sveriges bergslag (in Swedish).
95. Rønning, L. 2009. " Byggdeentreprenørerne-muligheter og utfordringer ". In Bygdeutviklere i Nordland, Edited by: Mossleth, S. 146 - 156. Stamsund: Orkana A. (in Norwegian)
96. Sabatier, P. A., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A. and Matlock, M. 2005. " Collaborative approaches to watershed management ". In Swimming Upstream. Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management, Edited by: Sabatier, P. A. 4 - 21. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
97. Sandström, U. G., Khakee, A. and Angelstam, P. 2006. Urban comprehensive planning-identifying barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1-2): 43 - 57. (doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.016)
98. Schmidt, S. (2009) Has planning in Germany changed? Recent developments in local and regional planning in Germany, European Planning Studies, 17(12), pp. 1907-1921.
99. Seebass, F. (1928) Bergslagen: Versuch einer kulturgeographischen Beschreibung und Umgrenzung, Nordische Studien No. 9, Greifswald.
100. SGU (2007) National Bedrock Data, p. 13 (Uppsala: Geological Survey of Sweden) (in Swedish).
101. Singer, B. (2007) How useful is the landscape approach? In: M. Patry & S. Ripley (Eds) World Heritage Forests. Leveraging Conservation and the Landscape Level, Proceedings of the 2nd World Heritage forests meeting, March 9-11, 2005, pp. 49-55, Paris.
102. Skidmore, A. K., Bijker, W., Schmidt, K. and Kumar, L. 1997. Use of remote sensing and GIS for sustainable land management. Instrumental Transcommunication Journal, 3 (4): 302 - 315.
103. SKL (2007) Kommunalförbund och gemensamma nämnder. Studie utförd på uppdrag av Kommunala kompetensutredningen. Rapport 2007-03-22, Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (in Swedish).
104. Sommestad, L. (2002) Government Communications, 2002/3:29, UN World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg.
105. SOU (1997) Regionpolitik för hela Sverige. Betänkande i REKO-STAT-utredningen, p. 13 (Stockholm: Närings- och handelsdepartementet) (in Swedish).
106. SOU (2006) Stärkt konkurrenskraft och syssels{eth}ttning i hela landet, p. 3 (Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar) (in Swedish).
107. Sýkora, L. (1999) Local and regional planning and policy in east central European transitional countries, in: M. Hampl (Ed.) Geography of Societal Transformation in the Czech Republic, pp. 153-179 (Prague: Charles University of Prague).
108. Thellbro, C. (2006) Local natural resource dependency in a Swedish boreal municipally context, Licentiate thesis, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomantic, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.
109. Tillväxtverket (2011) Genuint sârbara kommuner. Rapport 0112, Stockholm: Swedish Agency for Economical and Regional Growth (in Swedish).
110. Törnblom, J. (2008) A landscape approach towards ecological integrity of catchments and streams, Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 2008, p. 70.
111. Törnblom, J. & Angelstam, P. (2006) Evaluation of the link between policy and practice: Public investment in nature conservation for biodiversity and people. in: B. Frostell (Ed.) Science for Sustainable Development-Starting Points and Critical Reflections, Proceedings from the 1st VHU Conference on Science for Sustainable Development, pp. 267-275, (Sweden: Västerås).
112. Tress, B., Tress, G. and Fry, G. 2004. " Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research ". In From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application, Edited by: Tress, B., Tress, G., Fry, G. and Opdam, P. 13 - 26. Dordrecht: Springer.
113. Ullsten, O., Angelstam, P., Cropper, A., Patel, A., Pinter, L., Rapport, D. J. & Washburn, M. (2004) Towards the assessment of environmental sustainability in forest ecosystems: Measuring the natural capital. Ecological Bulletins 51, pp. 471-485 (Wiley: United States).
114. Vierikko, K., Vehkamäki, S., Niemelä, J., Pellikka, J. and Lindén, H. 2008. Meeting the ecological, social and economic needs of sustainable forest management at a regional scale. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23 (5): 431 - 444. (doi:10.1080/02827580802284693)
115. Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W. 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth, Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
116. Wieslander, G. 1936. The shortage of forest in Sweden during the 17th and 18th centuries. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift, 34: 593 - 633.
117. World Forestry Congress. (2009) Forest Development: A Vital Balance, Findings and Strategic Actions, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Available at http://www.foris.fao.org/meetings/download/_2009/xiii_th_world_forestry_congress/misc_documents/wfc_declaration.pdf (accessed 1 April 2011).