Cheminformatics and the Semantic Web: Adding value with linked data and enhanced provenance

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 465-481

  Frey, Jeremy G ^a   Bird, Colin L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICALS; CHEMICAL DATA; CHEMINFORMATICS; DRUG DISCOVERY; HETEROGENEOUS SOURCES; LINKED DATUM; MEDICAL INFORMATION; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

BIOINFORMATICS;

EID: 84881644221     PISSN: 17590876     EISSN: 17590884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1127     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. Brown FK. Chemoinformatics: what is it and how does it impact drug discovery. Annu Rep Med Chem 1998, 33:375-384.
2. Willett P. Chemoinformatics: a history. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011, 1:46-56.
3. Warr WA. Some Trends in Chem(o)informatics. Chemoinformatics and computational chemical biology. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 672:1-37.
4. Journal of Cheminformatics. http://www.jcheminf.com/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
5. Jones PBC. The commercialization of bioinformatics. EJB Electronic J Biotechnol 2000, 3.
6. Sukumar N, Krein M, Breneman CM. Bioinformatics and cheminformatics: where do the twain meet? Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 2008, 11:311-319.
7. Oprea TI, Tropsha A, Faulon J-L, Rintoul MD. Systems chemical biology. Nat Chem Biol 2007, 3:447-450.
8. Wild DJ, Ding Y, Sheth AP, Harland L, Gifford EM, Lahiness MS. Systems chemical biology and the Semantic Web: what they mean for the future of drug discovery research. Drug Discov Today 2012, 17:469-474.
9. Chepelev L, Dumontier M. Semantic Web integration of cheminformatics resources with the SADI framework. J Cheminform 2011, 3:16.
10. Ludlow RF, Otto S. Systems chemistry. Chem Soc Rev 2008, 37:101-108.
11. Reymond J-L, Ruddigkeit L, Blum L, van Duersen R. The enumeration of chemical space. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2012, 2:717-733.
12. Kim S. Cyberinfrastructure: enabling the chemical sciences. J Chem Inf Model 2006, 46:938-938.
13. Adams N. Semantic Chemistry. Available at: http://semanticweb.com/semantic-chemistry_b10684. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
14. Hawizy L. The Semantification of Chemistry. Available at: http://semanticweb.com/the-semantification-of-chemistry_b10704. (Accessed August 10, 2012).
15. Frey JG. The value of the Semantic Web in the laboratory. Drug Discov Today 2009, 14:552-561.
16. Scimantica-Semantic Science. Reading the tea leaves of 2011-data and technology predictions for the year ahead. Available at: http://semanticscience.wordpress.com/category/semantic-web/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
17. Hey A, Tansley S, Tolle K, eds. The Fourth Paradigm, Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Research; 2009.
18. Ince D. The Dukes University scandal-what can be done? Significance 2011, 8:113-115.
19. Frey J. Curation of laboratory experimental data as part of the overall data lifecycle. Int J Digital Curation 2008, 3:44-62.
20. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The Semantic Web. Sci Am 2001, 284:35-43.
21. Feigenbaum L, Herman I, Hongsermeier T, Neumann E, Stephens S. The Semantic Web in action. Sci Am 2007, 297:90-97.
22. Frey JG, Bird CL. Web-based services for drug design and discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2011, 6:885-895.
23. Wild DJ. Data mining and querying of integrated chemical and biological information using Chem2Bio2RDF. In: ACS RDF Symposium. Boston, MA: American Chemical Society; 2010.
24. Curcin V, Ghanem M, Guo Y. Web services in the life sciences. Drug Discov Today 2005, 10:865-871.
25. Tetko IV. Computing chemistry on the web. Drug Discov Today 2005, 10:1497-1500.
26. Bhagat J, Tanoh F, Nzuobontane E, Laurent T, Orlowski J, Roos M, Wolstencroft K, Aleksejevs S, Stevens R, Pettifer S, et al . BioCatalogue: a universal catalogue of web services for the life sciences. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(suppl 2):W689-W694.
27. Christensen E, Curbera F, Meredith G, Weerawarana S. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 2001. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
28. Gudgin M, Hadley M, Mendelsohn N, Moreau J-J, Nielsen HF, Karmarkar A, Lafon Y. SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: messaging framework (2nd ed). Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
29. Rodriguez A. RESTful Web services: the basics. Available at: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-restful/. (Accessed June 8, 2012.)
30. Peachey M, Roter A. Using extensible informatics to optimize drug discovery. Available at: http://www.scientificcomputing.com/using-extensible-informatics-to.aspx. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
31. Reese A. Databases and documenting data. Significance 2007, 4:184-186.
32. Alsberg BK, Clare A. Wiki based management of chemometric research projects. J Chemometr 2010, 24:408-417.
33. Taylor KT. The status of electronic laboratory notebooks for chemistry and biology. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 2006, 9:348-353.
34. Frey J, De Roure D, Taylor K, Essex J, Mills H, Zaluska E. CombeChem: a case study in provenance and annotation using the Semantic Web. In: Moreau L, Foster I, eds. IPAW 2006. LNCS. Vol. 4145. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 270-277.
35. Frey JG, Hughes GV, Mills HR, schraefel mc, Smith GM, De Roure D. Less is More: Lightweight Ontologies and User Interfaces for Smart Labs. In: Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, Sep 2003, EPSRC 2004. Available at: http://www.allhands.org.uk/proceedings/papers/187.pdf. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
36. Slater T, Bouton C, Huang E. Beyond data integration. Drug Discov Today 2008, 13:584-589.
37. Wild DJ. Mining large heterogeneous data sets in drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2009, 4:995-1004.
38. Guha R, Gilbert K, Fox G, Pierce M, Wild D, Yuan H. Advances in cheminformatics methodologies and infrastructure to support the data mining of large, heterogeneous chemical datasets. Curr Comput-Aided Drug Design 2010, 6:50-67.
39. Manola F, Miller E. RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
40. Stephens S, LaVigna D, DiLascio M, Luciano J. Aggregation of bioinformatics data using Semantic Web technology. J Web Semantics 2006, 4:216-221.
41. McCusker JP, Phillips JA, Beltran AG, Finkelstein A, Krauthammer M. Semantic Web data warehousing for caGrid. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(suppl 10):S2.
42. Chen B, Dong X, Jiao D, Wang H, Zhu Q, Ding Y, Wild DJ. Chem2Bio2RDF: a semantic framework for linking and data mining chemogenomic and systems chemical biology data. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:255.
43. Triplestore - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_store. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
44. Frey J. Triple store databases and their role in high throughput, automated extensible data analysis. Available at: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/15165/1/JGF_CINF_ACS_RDF_public.pdf. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
45. Hastings J, Chepelev L, Willighagen E, Adams N, Steinbeck C, Dumontier M. The chemical information ontology: provenance and disambiguation for chemical data on the biological semantic web. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e25513.
46. Chepelev L, Dumontier M. Chemical entity semantic specification: knowledge representation for efficient semantic cheminformatics and facile data integration. J Cheminformatics 2011, 3:20.
47. Blomberg N, Ecker GF, Kidd R, Mons B, Williams-Jones B. Knowledge driven drug discovery goes semantic. EFMC Yearbook 2011. Available at: http://www.openphacts.org/img/article_yearbook_2011. (Accessed June 2012).
48. Jiao D, Wild DJ. Extraction of CYP chemical interactions from biomedical literature using natural language processing methods. J ChemInf Model 2009, 49:263-269.
49. Downing J, Harvey MJ, Morgan PB, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa HS, Stewart DC, Tonge AP, Townsend JA. SPECTRa-T: machine-based data extraction and semantic searching of chemistry e-theses. J Chem Inf Model 2010, 50:251-261.
50. Chen M, Stott AC, Li S, Dixon DA. Construction of a robust, large-scale, collaborative database for raw data in computational chemistry: the Collaborative Chemistry Database Tool (CCDBT). J Mol Graphics Modelling 2012, 34:67-75.
51. Taylor KR, Gledhill RJ, Essex JW, Frey JG, Harris SW, De Roure DC. Bringing chemical data onto the Semantic Web. J ChemInf Model 2006, 46:939-952.
52. Downs GM, Barnard JM. Chemical patent information systems. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011, 1:727-741.
53. Park JS. Towards secure collaboration on the Semantic Web. ACM SIGCAS Comput Soc 2003, 33.
54. Vollmer JJ. Wiswesser line notation: an introduction. J Chem Educ 1983, 60:192-195.
55. Weininger D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1988, 28:31-36.
56. The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier (InChI). Available at: http://www.iupac.org/inchi/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
57. Williams AJ. Internet-based tools for communication and collaboration in chemistry. Drug Discov Today 2008, 13:502-506.
58. Coles SJ, Day NE, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa HS, Zhang Y. Enhancement of the chemical semantic web through the use of InChI identifiers. Org Biomol Chem 2005, 3:1832-1834.
59. Bhat T. Chemical Taxonomies and Ontologiers for Semantic Web. Available at: http://semanticweb.com/chemical-taxonomies-and-ontologies-for-semantic-web_b10926. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
60. Dbpedia . Available at: http://dbpedia.org/About. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
61. Schreiber S, Kapoor T, Wess G, eds . Chemical Biology: From Small Molecules to Systems Biology and Drug Design. John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
62. Kohler JJ. Chemical biology meets networks. Nat Chem Biol 2007, 3:528-529.
63. Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI). Available at: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/. (Accessed June8, 2012).
64. PubChem. Available at: http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
65. Pancerella C, Hewson J, Koegler W, Leahy D, Lee M, Rahn L, Yang C, Myers JD, Didier B, McCoy R, et al. Metadata in the collaboratory for multi-scale chemical science. In: DCMI '03 Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice-Metadata Research and Applications.
66. ISA tools. Available at: http://isatab.sourceforge.net/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
67. Williams AJ, Ekins S. A quality alert and call for improved curation of public chemistry databases. Drug Discov Today 2011, 16:747-750.
68. Williams AJ. Public compound databases. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 2008, 11:393-404.
69. Murray-Rust P, Rzepa HS. Chemical Markup, XML, and the World Wide Web. 4. CML Schema. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003, 43:757-772.
70. Murray-Rust P, Townsend JA, Adams SE, Phadungsukanan W, Thomas J. The semantics of Chemical Markup Language (CML): dictionaries and conventions. J Cheminform 2011, 3:43.
71. Chemical Markup Language. Available at: http://www.xml-cml.org/documentation/biblio.html. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
72. Berners-Lee T. Linked Data. Available at: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
73. eCrystals. Available at: http://ecrystals.chem.soton.ac.uk/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
74. Coles SJ, Frey JG, Hursthouse MB, Light ME, Milsted AJ, Carr LA, De Roure D, Gutteridge CJ, Mills HR, Meacham KE, et al. An E-science environment for service crystallography-from submission to dissemination. J Chem Inf Model 2006, 46:1006-1016.
75. W3C. SWEO Community Project: Linking Open Data on the Semantic Web. Available at: http://www.w3.org/wiki/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/DataSets. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
76. W3C. Linking Open Drug Data (LODD). Available at: http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/LODD. Accessed June 8, 2012).
77. Samwald M, Jentxsch A, Bouton C, Kallesøe CS, Willighagen E, Hajagos J, Marshall MS, Prud'hommeaux E, Hassanzadeh O, Pichler E, Stephens S. Linked open drug data for pharmaceutical research and development. J Cheminform 2011, 3:19.
78. Todor A, Paschke A, Heineke S. ChemCloud: chemical e-Science information cloud. Nat Preceding 2011. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
79. Murray-Rust P, Rzepa H. The next big thing: from hypermedia to datuments. J Digital Inform 2004, 5:1 Available at: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/130/128. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
80. Borkum M, Lagoze C, Frey J, Coles S. A semantic eScience platform for chemistry. In: IEEE Sixth International Conference on e-Science; 2010, 316-323.
81. Simmhan YL, Plale B, Gannon D. A survey of data provenance in e-Science 2005. SIGMOD Record 34:31-36.
82. Cheung K, Hunter J. Provenance explorer-customized provenance views using semantic inferencing. In: Fifth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2006). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 215-227.
83. Hunter J, Cheung K. Provenance Explorer-a graphical interface for constructing scientific publication packages from provenance trails. Int J Digit Libr 2007, 7:99-107.
84. Taylor K, Essex JW, Frey JG, Mills HR, Hughes G, Zaluska EJ. The semantic grid and chemistry: experiences with CombeChem. J Web Semantics 2006, 4. Available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12505/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
85. Adams N, Cannon EO, Murray-Rust P. ChemAxiom-an ontological framework for chemistry in science. Nat Precedings 2009.
86. Guha R, Howard MT, Hutchison GR, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa H, Steinbeck C, Wegner J, Willighagen EL. The Blue Obelisk-interoperability in chemical informatics. J ChemInf Model 2006, 46:991-998.
87. Murray-Rust P, Rzepa HS, Tyrrell SM, Zhang Y. Representation and use of chemistry in the global electronic age. Org Biomol Chem 2004, 2:3192-3203.
88. Gerber AJ, Barnard A, Van der Merwe A. A semantic web status model. integrated design and process technology, special issue: IDPT 2006. Available at: http://hufee.meraka.org.za/Hufeesite/staff/the-hufee-group/altas-documents/SWStatus.pdf/view. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
89. Chen H, Ma J, Wang Y, Wu Z. A survey on semantic e-Science applications. Comput Inf 2008, 27:5-20.
90. Wikberg J, Eklund M, Willighagen E, Spjuth O, Lapins M, Engkvist O, Alvarsson J. Introduction to Pharmaceutical Bioinformatics. Stockholm: Oakleaf Academic; 2010.
91. Journal of Cheminformatics, Thematic Series. RDF technologies in chemistry. Available at: http://www.jcheminf.com/series/acsrdf2010. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
92. Willighagen EL, Brändle MP. Resource description framework technologies in chemistry. J Cheminform 2011, 3:15.
93. Bachrach SM. Chemistry publication-making the revolution. J Cheminform 2009, 1:2.
94. Bachrach SM, Krassavine A, Burleigh DC. End-user customized chemistry journal articles. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1999. 39:81-85.
95. Fox GC, Guha R, McMullen DF, Mustacoglu AF, Pierce ME, Topcu AE, Wild DJ. Web 2.0 for grids and e-Science in grid enabled remote instrumentation. Signals Commun Technol 2009, IV:409-431.
96. W3C. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
97. Casher O, Rzepa HS. SemanticEye: a semantic web application to rationalize and enhance chemical electronic publishing. J Chem Inf Model 2006, 46:2396-2411.
98. Casher O, Rzepa HS. Planned Research Serendipity: Exploiting Web 3.0. Symplectic User Community Conference, May 5, 2009. Available at: http://www.symplectic.co.uk/assets/files/omercasher.ppt. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
99. Adams N, de Matos P, Dekker A, Ennis M, Hastings J, Haug K, Hull D, Josephs Z, Moreno P Turner S, Steinbeck C. Semantic access to chemistry data with the ChEBI ontology and web services. In: Proceedings of Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences (SWAT4LS-2009). Available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-559/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
100. de Matos P, Alcántara R, Dekker A, Ennis M, Hastings J, Haug K, Spiteri I, Turner S, Steinbeck C. Chemical entities of biological interest: an update. Nucl Acids Res 2010 38(suppl 1):D249-D254.
101. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, Ceusters W, Goldberg LJ, Eilbeck K, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:1252-1255.
102. O'Boyle N, Guha R, Willighagen EL, Adams SE, Alvarsson J, Bradley J-C, Filippov IV, Hanson RM, Hanwell MD, Hutchison GR, et al. Open data, open source and open standards in chemistry: the Blue Obelisk five years on. J Cheminform 2011, 3:37.
103. Choi JY, Davis MJ, Newman AF, Ragan MA. A Semantic Web ontology for small molecules and their biological targets. J Chem Inf Model 2010, 50:732-741.
104. Chen H, Xie G. The use of web ontology languages and other semantic web tools in drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2010, 5:413-423.
105. Havukkula I. Ontologies and semantic mining for bio-technology and chemistry data and patents. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Patent Information Retrieval. 2009.
106. Chin G, Lansing CS. Capturing and Supporting Contexts for Scientific Data Sharing via the Biological Sciences Collaboratory. In: CSCW'04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work 2004, 409-418.
107. Digital Curation Centre. Available at: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
108. Pavlis R. ELN and the paperless lab. 2011. Available at: http://www.labtronics.com/resources/nexxeln_ebook.asp. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
109. Quinnell R, Hibbert DB, Milsted A. eScience: evaluating electronic laboratory notebooks in chemistry research. In: Proceedings Ascilite Auckland; 2009.
110. Quinnell R, Hibbert DB. Introducing an electronic laboratory notebook to PhD students undertaking chemistry research at a research intensive university. In: International Conference on Education, Training and Informatics: ICETI. Orlando, FL; 2010.
111. Downing J, Murray-Rust P, Tonge AP, Morgan P, Rzepa HS, Cotterill F, Day N, Harvey MJ. SPECTRa: the deposition and validation of primary chemistry research data in digital repositories. J Chem Inf Model 2008, 48:1571-1581.
112. Murray-Rust P, Rzepa HS. Scientific publications in XML-towards a global knowledge base. Data Sci 2002, 1:84-98. Available at: http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/codata/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
113. Frey JG, DeRoure D, Carr L. Publication At Source: Scientific Communication from a Publication Web to a Data Grid. Euroweb 2002 the Web and the GRID: from e-Science to e-Business, British Computer Society. Available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/7852/1/index.html. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
114. Shotton D. Semantic publishing: the coming revolution in scientific journal publishing. Learn Publish 2009, 22:85-95.
115. RSC Semantic publishing. Available at: http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Journals/ProjectProspect/index.asp (Accessed June 8, 2012).
116. ChemSpider. Available at: http://www.chemspider.com/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
117. ChemSpider Blog. Available at: http://www.chemspider.com/blog/rsc-publishing-and-southampton-university-drive-the-chemical-semantic-web.html. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
118. Martinsen DP. Scholarly Communication 2.0: evolution or design? ACS Chem Biol 2007, 2:368-371.
119. eMolecules. http://www.emolecules.com/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
120. CrystalEye. Available at: http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/crystaleye/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
121. Richard AM, Gold LS, Nicklaus MC. Chemical structure indexing of toxicity data on the Internet: moving toward a flat world. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 2006, 9:314-325.
122. Willighagen EL, Alvarsson J, Andersson A, Eklund M, Lampa S, Lapins M, Spjuth O, Wikkberg JES. Linking the resource description framework to cheminformatics and proteochemometrics. J Biomed Semantics 2011, 2(suppl 1):S6.
123. Oprea TI, Nielsen SK, Ursu O, Yang JL, Taboureau O, Mathias SL, Kouskoumvekaki I, Sklar LA, Bologa CG. Associating Drugs, Targets and Clinical Outcomes into an Integrated Network Affords a New Platform for Computer-Aided Drug Repurposing. Wiley Online Library; 2011.
124. Wild DJ. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/davidjwild/home. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
125. Zhu Q, Lajiness MS, Ding Y, Wild DJ. WENDI: a tool for finding non-obvious relationships between compounds and biological properties, genes, diseases and scholarly publications. J Cheminform 2010, 2:6.
126. Kuhn T, Willighagen EL, Zielesny A, Steinbeck C. CDK-Taverna: an open workflow environment for cheminformatics. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:159.
127. Fox GC, Guha R, McMullen MC, Mustacoglu AF, Pierce ML, Topcu AE, Wild DJ. Web 2.0 for grids and e-Science. In: Proceedings of INGRID 2007-Instrumenting the Grid 2nd International Workshop on Distributed Cooperative Laboratories; 2007.
128. OpenTox. Available at: http://www.opentox.org/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
129. Hohman M, Gregory K, Chibale K, Smith PJ, Ekins S, Bunin B. Novel web-based tools combining chemistry informatics, biology and social networks for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2009, 14:261-270.
130. Useful Chemistry Open Notebook Science. Available at: http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
131. Our Experiment. Available at: http://www.ourexperiment.org/racemic_pzq. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
132. Todor A. Semantic technologies applied in chemistry. Available at: http://2010.xinnovations.de/downloads-2010.html (Corporate Semantic Web). (Accessed June 8, 2012).
133. Hunter J, Henderson M, Khan I. Collaborative annotation of 3D crystallographic models. J Chem Inf Model 2007, 47:2475-2484.
134. Annotea. Available at: http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
135. Adams N, Murray-Rust P. Engineering polymer informatics: towards the computer-aided design of polymers. Macromol Rapid Commu 2008, 29:615-632. Available at: http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/196402. (Accessed June 8, 2012).
136. Cheminformatics at So much to do, so little time. Available at: http://blog.rguha.net/?tag=cheminformatics-research. Accessed June 8, 2012).